Therapeutic Escalation, Treatment Intensification, and Modification Patterns in Patients Receiving Antidiabetic Therapy
Abstract
Background: The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus frequently necessitates therapeutic intensification, treatment modification, and regimen optimization to achieve sustained glycaemic control and minimize long-term complications. Evaluating patterns of therapeutic escalation provides valuable insights into real-world prescribing practices and disease management strategies. Objective: To assess therapeutic escalation, treatment intensification, dose modification, and prescription adaptation patterns among patients receiving antidiabetic therapy in routine clinical practice. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted involving 400 patients receiving antidiabetic treatment. Demographic characteristics, therapeutic escalation status, utilization of fixed-dose and free-drug combinations, drug-switching practices, add-on therapy patterns, and dose-adjustment trends were systematically evaluated using structured prescription review and patient record analysis. Descriptive statistical methods were employed to summarize treatment modification patterns. Results: Male patients predominated the study population (60.0%), with the highest representation observed in the 46–55-year age category (27.5%). Therapeutic escalation analysis demonstrated that second-line intensification constituted the most prevalent treatment strategy (43.25%), followed by first-line therapy maintenance (31.5%), third-line escalation (20.25%), and advanced or complex therapeutic regimens (5.0%). Free-drug combinations were prescribed slightly more frequently than fixed-dose combinations (53.25% vs. 46.75%). Nearly half of the patients (49.0%) exhibited no treatment modification during follow-up, whereas add-on therapy (37.5%) was substantially more common than drug switching (13.5%). Dose-adjustment evaluation revealed that 61.0% of prescriptions remained unchanged, while dose escalation and dose reduction were observed in 25.5% and 13.5% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: The findings underscore a substantial reliance on second-line therapeutic intensification and add-on treatment strategies in contemporary diabetes management. The predominance of regimen augmentation over drug substitution highlights clinicians’ preference for progressive pharmacotherapeutic optimization, emphasizing individualized treatment approaches aimed at achieving durable glycaemic control and improved clinical outcomes.
Keywords: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Therapeutic Escalation; Treatment Intensification; Antidiabetic Therapy; Prescription Patterns; Add-on Therapy.
Keywords:
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Therapeutic Escalation, Treatment Intensification, Antidiabetic Therapy, Prescription Patterns, Add-on TherapyDOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i9.7971References
1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2021.
2. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Groop L, Henry RR, Herman WH, Holst JJ, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015; 1:15019. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.19 PMid:27189025
3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1): S1-S350.
4. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, Gabbay RA, Green J, Maruthur NM, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. Diabetologia. 2022;65(12):1925-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05787-2 PMid:36151309
5. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, Rossing P, Mingrone G, Mathieu C, et al. 2022 update to management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2753-86. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci22-0034 PMid:36148880
6. Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich EL, Bonaca MP, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2019;393(10166):31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32590-X PMid:30424892
7. Khunti K, Gomes MB, Pocock S, Shestakova MV, Pintat S, Fenici P, et al. Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):427-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13088 PMid:28834075 PMCid:PMC5813232
8. Bangalore S, Kamalakkannan G, Parkar S, Messerli FH. Fixed-dose combinations improve medication compliance. Am J Med. 2007;120(8):713-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.08.033 PMid:17679131
9. Paul SK, Klein K, Thorsted BL, Wolden ML, Khunti K. Delay in treatment intensification increases risk of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1449-55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-015-0260-x PMid:26249018 PMCid:PMC4528846
10. Ali MK, Bullard KM, Saaddine JB, Cowie CC, Imperatore G, Gregg EW. Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(17):1613-24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1213829 PMid:23614587
11. Asche CV, LaFleur J, Conner C. A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes. Clin Ther. 2011;33(1):74-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.019 PMid:21397776
12. Kalyani RR, Neumiller JJ, Maruthur NM, Wexler DJ. Diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes in adults: A review. JAMA. 2023;330(12):1177-1195.
13. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, Gabbay RA, Green J, Maruthur NM, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022: A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2022;65(12):1925-1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05787-2 PMid:36151309
14. Alabkal RM, Medlinskiene K, Silcock J, Graham A. Impact of pharmacist-led interventions to improve clinical outcomes for adults with type 2 diabetes at risk of developing cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pharm Technol. 2023;39(4):888-899. https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900211064459 PMid:35579209 PMCid:PMC10350718
15. Khunti K, Gomes MB, Pocock S, Shestakova MV, Pintat S, Fenici P, et al. Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):427-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13088 PMid:28834075 PMCid:PMC5813232
16. Kalra S, Gupta Y, Kumar A. Fixed-dose combinations in diabetes management: Current status and future perspectives. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(8):2151-2164.
17. Riddle MC, Cefalu WT, Evans PH, Gerstein HC, Nauck MA, Oh WK, et al. Consensus recommendations for advancing therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(11):2589-2603. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci21-0034 PMid:34462270 PMCid:PMC8929179
18. Aroda VR, Ahmann A, Cariou B, Chow F, Evans M, Jódar E, et al. Comparative efficacy, safety, and cardiovascular outcomes of glucose-lowering therapies in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(4):1017-1028.
19. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, Rossing P, Mingrone G, Mathieu C, et al. 2023 update to the management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2023;66(7):1261-1286.
20. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2021.
21. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S1-S321.
22. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: Patient-centered approach. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140-149. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2441 PMid:25538310 PMCid:PMC10307744
23. McGuire DK, Shih WJ, Cosentino F, Charbonnel B, Cherney DZI, Dagogo-Jack S, et al. Association of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists with cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(10):653-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00203-5 PMid:34425083
Published
Abstract Display: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
PDF Downloads: 0 How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Syed Raziuddin Faisal , H. S. Shekar , B. Nagaraju

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

.