Formulation Development, Process Optimization, and Quality Assessment of Amlodipine Besylate 5 Mg Tablets for Regulatory Submission
Abstract
Amlodipine besylate is a long-acting calcium channel blocker widely used for hypertension and angina, for which 5 mg amlodipine base is a standard dose; however, moisture sensitivity and excipient-mediated degradation can complicate development of pharmaceutically equivalent generic tablets intended for regulatory submission. This work aimed to develop, optimize, and quality-characterize an Amlodipine Besylate 5 mg tablet aligned with technical dossier expectations, with explicit excipient justification and stability assurance. To deliver 5 mg amlodipine base, tablets were formulated with 6.93 mg amlodipine besylate and manufactured by direct compression to reduce moisture exposure. The active substance was identified by UV spectrophotometry and open-capillary melting point. A lactose-free formulation strategy was implemented to avoid lactose–magnesium stearate interaction pathways associated with glycosyl degradation products; microcrystalline cellulose and anhydrous dibasic calcium phosphate were used as diluents/binders, sodium starch glycolate as super-disintegrant, and magnesium stearate as lubricant. Process optimization included Co-mill speeds of 1700–1900 RPM (optimized at ~1800 RPM), controlled sifting (#60 for API and sodium starch glycolate; #40 for diluents/lubricant), blending for 15 min, lubrication for 3 min, and compression. Optimized pilot batches met pharmacopoeial quality targets, including weight uniformity within ±7.5%, hardness >3.0 kg/cm², friability <1.0%, disintegration <10 min, and dissolution >80% in 30 min (exceeding the ≥75% criterion). Assay by stability-indicating HPLC-UV (C18, 237 nm) showed 98.5–101.3% across three batches, within the 90–110% specification. Forced degradation under acid/alkali hydrolysis and oxidation supported formulation stability without emergence of glycosyl impurities, and process capability evaluations indicated robust, reproducible milling and blending. Overall, the lactose-free direct-compression product provides a compliant quality package suitable for Module 3 dossier compilation and supports stable, equivalent tablet manufacture for approval.
Keywords: Amlodipine besylate, Direct compression, Stability-indicating, Process optimization, Regulatory submission, Dossier
Keywords:
Amlodipine besylate, Stability-indicating, Process optimization, Regulatory submission, DossierDOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i8.7925References
1. Heynen G. Amlodipine: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of a calcium antagonist with prolonged effect. Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis. 1992 Feb 11;81(7):199-203.
2. De La Sierra A. Amlodipine in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease. European Cardiology Review. 2007 Jan 1;3(2):66. https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2007.0.2.66
3. Jaya S, Amala V. FORMULATION AND IN VITRO EVALUATION OF ORAL DISINTEGRATING TABLETS OF AMLODIPINE BESYLATE. Int J App Pharm. 2019 Jan 9;11(1):49. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019v11i1.28457
4. Cayco S, Muaña C. Physicochemical and In-Vitro Equivalence of 15 Generic Amlodipine Besylate Tablets Marketed in Davao City, Philippines. RJPT. 2022 Dec 24;5714-5720. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00963
5. Ahsan SF, Sheraz MA, Khan MF, Anwar Z, Ahmed S, Ahmad I. Formulation and Stability Studies of Fast Disintegrating Tablets of Amlodipine Besylate. IJPER. 2019 July 3;53(3):480-493. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.53.3.80
6. Ramling V, Swamy S, Thonte S, Shivappa N, Pratap H. Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablet of Amlodipine Besylate. 2019 July 8;8(7):2717-2721.
7. Sulyma M, Vasyuk S, Zhuk Y, Kaminskyy D, Chupashko O, Ogurtsov V. New Spectrophotometric Method of Amlodipine Besylate Determination and its Validation. ChChT. 2018 Dec 10;12(4):429-433. https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht12.04.429
8. Priya P, Gahtori A. UV Spectrophotometric Method Development and Validation for Amlodipine Besylate in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form. AJPA. 2022 May 27;94-98. https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5675.2022.00017
9. Al-Mohsen Khdadad ZA, Khaleel AI, Rashid QN. Spectrophotometric methods for estimation of amlodipine besylate in pure form and in it’s pharmaceutical formulations. ijhs. 2022 Apr 27;7726-7741. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6673
10. Chono S, Yamada E, Matsui M, Sato T, Kasai R. Physicochemical qualities and ingestibility of high value-added amlodipine besilate formulations. Journal of Generic Medicines. 2016 Oct 7;13(1):28-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741134316673225
11. Sonawane G, Gangurde K, Sonawane V, Patil C, Bachhav R, Bhamare M, et al. Analytical Method Development and Validation of Amlodipine Besylate by UV-Visible Spectroscopy. AJRC. 2025 Apr 18;71-76. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-4150.2025.00011
12. Thi Huynh MD, Thi Le MN, Tran QT, Dang DK. Formulation and Stability of Orally Fast Disintegrating Tablets of Amlodipine besylate. RJPT. 2023 Sept 30;4049-4057. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00664
13. Shah PA, Zaidi HA, Syed HK, Ishfaq H, Altaf RM, Pervaiz A, et al. Formulation development and in vitro characterization of triple layer tablet containing amlodipine besylate, rosuvastatin calcium and hydrochlorothiazide. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2021 Mar 1;34(2(Supplary)):699-710.
14. Lee B. Pharmaceutical Preformulation: Physicochemical Properties of Excipients and Powders and Tablet Characterization. 2007 Aug 28;879-931. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470259818.ch23 PMCid:PMC2601663
15. Dudhat MKR. The Overview of Oral Solid Dosage Forms and Different Excipients Used for Solid Dosage Formulation. Global Academic Journal of Pharmacy and Drug Research Glob Acad J Pharm Drug Res. 2022 Aug 24;4(3):66-72. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajpdr.2022.v04i03.003
16. Darji MA, Lalge RM, Marathe SP, Mulay TD, Fatima T, Alshammari A, et al. Excipient Stability in Oral Solid Dosage Forms: A Review. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017 Sept 11;19(1):12-26. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-017-0864-4 PMid:28895106
17. Bittorf KJ, Sanghvi T, Katstra JP. DESIGN OF SOLID DOSAGE FORMULATIONS. 2019 Mar 29;19-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119600800.ch52
18. Bittorf KJ, Sanghvi T, Katstra JP. Design of Solid Dosage Formulations. 2010 Oct 29;673-702. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470882221.ch36
19. Dhumal M, Gadhire P, Bais D. Formulation Development. IJARSCT. 2023 Jan 20;578-588. https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-7918
20. Armstrong N. Tablet Manufacture. In Crc; 2013. p. 3522-3538. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EPT4-100001726
21. Azad MA, Osorio JG, Wang A, Klee DM, Eccles ME, Grela E, et al. On-Demand Manufacturing of Direct Compressible Tablets: Can Formulation Be Simplified? Pharm Res. 2019 Oct 24;36(12):167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-019-2716-2 PMid:31650274
22. Armstrong N. Tablet Manufacture by Direct Compression. In Crc; 2013. p. 3539-3549. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EPT4-120003785
23. Sharma S, Goyal S, Chauhan K. A REVIEW ON ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION. Int J App Pharm. 2018 Nov 22;10(6):8. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2018v10i6.28279
24. Meher V, Gautam G, Meher C, Patro S. A Recent Review On Analytical Method Development and Validation. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2022 Oct 7;
25. Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis. Wiley; 2014.
26. Singhal R. Process Validation in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry. IJSR. 2021 Apr 5;10(4):1420-1424. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR24910091810
27. Schofield T, Robbins D, Miró-Quesada G. Critical Quality Attributes, Specifications, and Control Strategy. In Springer New York; 2015. p. 511-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2316-8_21
28. Gamil A. Validation as applied for Pharmaceutical Processes. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2015 Jan 1;5(2):77-86.
29. F Z, R R, K S. A REVIEW ON STABILITY TESTING GUIDELINES OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2020 Aug 3;3-9. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i10.38848
30. Baria S, Koli K, Koli R, Dhodi M. STABILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS. EPRA. 2025 Feb 26;529-532. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra20347
31. Janjal V, Dhamodkar S, Jadhao Y, Manmode S, Pawar A, Khandelwal H. Recent drug regulatory affair and CTD module progress review for submission of pharmaceuticals product. GSC Biol and Pharm Sci. 2021 Sept 30;16(3):200-221. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.16.3.0279
32. Janjal V, Jadhao Y, Pawar A, Manmode S, Dhamodkar S, Khandelwal H. Recent drug regulatory affair and CTD module progress review for submission of pharmaceuticals product. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2021 Sept 30;
33. Godiyal S. Regulatory requirements for preparation of Dossier for registration of Pharmaceutical products in ACTD & CTD format. Int J Drug Reg Affairs. 2019 June 16;7(2):51-61. https://doi.org/10.22270/ijdra.v7i2.318
34. Jordan D. An overview of the Common Technical Document (CTD) regulatory dossier. Medical Writing. 2014 May 15;23(2):101-105. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480614Z.000000000207
Published
Abstract Display: 47
PDF Downloads: 50
PDF Downloads: 8 How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohd Naseeb , Anju Goyal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

.