Formulation and Evaluation of Cefotaxime-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections

Authors

  • Roshni Sahu Shri Ram Institute of Technology – Pharmacy, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh INDIA
  • Pushpendra Kumar Khangar Shri Ram Institute of Technology – Pharmacy, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh INDIA https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3045-8074

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, particularly those caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, have substantially compromised the therapeutic efficacy of cefotaxime, a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic. The present study was aimed at formulating and evaluating cefotaxime-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles as a controlled-release antibacterial delivery system capable of overcoming the pharmacokinetic and resistance-related limitations of the conventional drug. Nanoparticles were prepared by the solvent evaporation/nanoprecipitation technique, and formulation variables – namely drug-to-polymer ratio, PLGA concentration, surfactant (polyvinyl alcohol, PVA) concentration, stirring speed, and sonication time – were systematically optimized using a one-factor-at-a-time approach. The optimized formulation (drug:polymer 1:5, PLGA 2.0% w/v, PVA 1.5% w/v, stirring speed 14,000 rpm, sonication time 6 min) yielded nanoparticles with a mean particle size of 165.3 ± 1.9 nm, a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.214 ± 0.02, and a zeta potential of −28.6 ± 1.4 mV. Drug loading and encapsulation efficiency were found to be 21.4 ± 0.3% and 93.8 ± 0.7%, respectively. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) confirmed the absence of significant drug–polymer interaction. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy revealed smooth, spherical, well-dispersed nanoparticles. In vitro release studies demonstrated a biphasic pattern, with an initial burst release followed by sustained release of cefotaxime for up to 72 hours. Antibacterial evaluation by agar well diffusion, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and time–kill assays revealed significantly enhanced and sustained activity of the nanoformulation against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae relative to free cefotaxime. The formulation remained physicochemically stable for 90 days under International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) long-term storage conditions and exhibited hemolysis below the 5% safety threshold, indicating excellent hemocompatibility. Collectively, these findings indicate that cefotaxime-loaded PLGA nanoparticles represent a promising, biocompatible, and scalable sustained-release platform with potential application in the treatment of MDR bacterial infections.

Keywords: Cefotaxime; PLGA nanoparticles; Multidrug resistance; Controlled drug release; Encapsulation efficiency; Antibacterial activity; Nanomedicine

Keywords:

Cefotaxime, PLGA nanoparticles, Multidrug resistance, Controlled drug release, Encapsulation efficiency, Antibacterial activity, Nanomedicine

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i7.7860

Author Biographies

Roshni Sahu , Shri Ram Institute of Technology – Pharmacy, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh INDIA

Shri Ram Institute of Technology – Pharmacy, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh INDIA

Pushpendra Kumar Khangar , Shri Ram Institute of Technology – Pharmacy, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh INDIA

Shri Ram Institute of Technology – Pharmacy, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh INDIA

References

1. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. Geneva: WHO Press; 2014.

2. O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. London: HM Government; 2016.

3. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(8):1079-81. https://doi.org/10.1086/533452 PMid:18419525

4. Neu HC. The in vitro activity, human pharmacology, and clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam antibiotics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1982;22:599-642. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pa.22.040182.003123 PMid:6282190

5. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657-86. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.18.4.657-686.2005 PMid:16223952 PMCid:PMC1265908

6. Drawz SM, Bonomo RA. Three decades of beta-lactamase inhibitors. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(1):160-201. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00037-09 PMid:20065329 PMCid:PMC2806661

7. Abed N, Couvreur P. Nanocarriers for antibiotics: a promising solution to treat intracellular bacterial infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43(6):485-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.02.009 PMid:24721232

8. Cheow WS, Hadinoto K. Enhancing encapsulation efficiency of highly water-soluble antibiotic in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles: modifications of standard nanoparticle preparation methods. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2010;370(1-3):79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.08.050

9. Danhier F, Ansorena E, Silva JM, Coco R, Le Breton A, Préat V. PLGA-based nanoparticles: an overview of biomedical applications. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):505-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.043 PMid:22353619

10. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers (Basel). 2011;3(3):1377-97. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym3031377 PMid:22577513 PMCid:PMC3347861

11. Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Aguilar GR, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 PMid:35065702 PMCid:PMC8841637

12. Gupta E, Mohanty S, Sood S, Dhawan B, Das BK, Kapil A. Emerging resistance to carbapenems in a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24(1):60-1.

13. Indian Council of Medical Research. Annual report - AMR surveillance network. New Delhi: ICMR; 2023.

14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Atlanta: CDC; 2019.

15. Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, Zaidi AK, Wertheim HF, Sumpradit N, et al. Antibiotic resistance - the need for global solutions. Lancet. 2013;382(9916):1057-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9 PMid:24252483

16. British National Formulary. Cefotaxime monograph. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2023.

17. Garber G. An overview of fungal infections. Drugs. 2001;61(Suppl 1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200161001-00001 PMid:11219546

18. Waxman DJ, Strominger JL. Penicillin-binding proteins and the mechanism of action of beta-lactam antibiotics. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983;52:825-69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.004141 PMid:6351730

19. Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1086/516284 PMid:9455502 PMCid:PMC6602257

20. Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(4):933-51. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.4.933-951.2001 PMid:11585791 PMCid:PMC89009

21. Cantón R, González-Alba JM, Galán JC. CTX-M enzymes: origin and diffusion. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00110 PMid:22485109 PMCid:PMC3316993

22. Nikaido H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67(4):593-656. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003 PMid:14665678 PMCid:PMC309051

23. Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Molin S, Ciofu O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35(4):322-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011 PMid:20149602 PMCid:PMC13010984

24. Anderson JM, Shive MS. Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;28(1):5-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00048-3 PMid:10837562

25. Astete CE, Sabliov CM. Synthesis and characterization of PLGA nanoparticles. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17(3):247-89. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856206775997322 PMid:16689015

26. Fredenberg S, Wahlgren M, Reslow M, Axelsson A. The mechanisms of drug release in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based drug delivery systems - a review. Int J Pharm. 2011;415(1-2):34-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.049 PMid:21640806

27. Forier K, Raemdonck K, De Smedt SC, Demeester J, Coenye T, Braeckmans K. Lipid and polymer nanoparticles for drug delivery to bacterial biofilms. J Control Release. 2014;190:607-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.055 PMid:24794896

28. Gref R, Minamitake Y, Peracchia MT, Trubetskoy V, Torchilin V, Langer R. Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science. 1994;263(5153):1600-3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8128245 PMid:8128245

29. Grenha A. Chitosan nanoparticles: a survey of preparation methods. J Drug Target. 2012;20(4):291-300. https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2011.654121 PMid:22296336

30. Panyam J, Labhasetwar V. Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(3):329-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00228-4 PMid:12628320

31. Müller RH, Maaßen S, Weyhers H, Specht F, Lucks JS. Cytotoxicity of magnetite-loaded polylactide, polylactide/glycolide particles and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN). Int J Pharm. 1996;138(1):85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(96)04539-5

32. Operti MC, Bernhardt A, Grimm S, Engel A, Figdor CG, Tagit O. PLGA-based nanoscale drug delivery systems for cancer therapy: a review of the state of the art. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2021;18(10):1365-85.

33. Bilati U, Allémann E, Doelker E. Development of a nanoprecipitation method intended for the entrapment of hydrophilic drugs into nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2005;24(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.09.011 PMid:15626579

34. Govender T, Stolnik S, Garnett MC, Illum L, Davis SS. PLGA nanoparticles prepared by nanoprecipitation: drug loading and release studies of a water soluble drug. J Control Release. 1999;57(2):171-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(98)00116-3 PMid:9971898

35. Ravi Kumar MN, Bakowsky U, Lehr CM. Preparation and characterization of cationic PLGA nanospheres as DNA carriers. Biomaterials. 2004;25(10):1771-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.069 PMid:14738840

36. Bhattacharjee S. DLS and zeta potential - what they are and what they are not? J Control Release. 2016;235:337-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017 PMid:27297779

37. Pelgrift RY, Friedman AJ. Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat microbial resistance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(13-14):1803-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.011 PMid:23892192 PMCid:PMC10475466

38. Rai MK, Deshmukh SD, Ingle AP, Gade AK. Silver nanoparticles: the powerful nanoweapon against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;112(5):841-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05253.x PMid:22324439

39. Imbuluzqueta E, Gamazo C, Ariza J, Blanco-Prieto MJ. Drug delivery systems for potential treatment of intracellular bacterial infections. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2010;15:397-417. https://doi.org/10.2741/3627 PMid:20036827

40. Anisimova YV, Gelperina SI, Peloquin CA, Heifets LB. Nanoparticles as antituberculosis drugs carriers: effect on activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human monocyte-derived macrophages. J Nanopart Res. 2000;2(2):165-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010061013365

41. Hachicha W, Kodjikian L, Fessi H. Preparation of vancomycin microparticles: importance of preparation parameters. Int J Pharm. 2006;324(2):176-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.06.005 PMid:16876347

42. Ungaro F, d’Angelo I, Miro A, La Rotonda MI, Quaglia F. Engineered PLGA nano- and micro-carriers for pulmonary delivery: challenges and promises. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2012;64(9):1217-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01486.x PMid:22881435

43. Bozkir A, Saka OM. Chitosan nanoparticles for plasmid DNA delivery: effect of chitosan molecular structure on formulation and release characteristics. Drug Deliv. 2004;11(2):107-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717540490280705 PMid:15200009

44. Balogh A, Drávavölgyi G, Faragó K, Farkas A, Vigh T, Sóti PL, et al. Plasticized drug-loaded melt electrospun polymer mats: characterization, thermal degradation, and release kinetics. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103(4):1278-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23904 PMid:24549788

45. ICH Expert Working Group. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2). International Conference on Harmonisation; 2009.

Published

2026-07-15
Statistics
Abstract Display: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
PDF Downloads: 0

How to Cite

1.
Sahu R, Khangar PK. Formulation and Evaluation of Cefotaxime-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 15 [cited 2026 Jul. 16];16(7):59-6. Available from: https://www.jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/7860

How to Cite

1.
Sahu R, Khangar PK. Formulation and Evaluation of Cefotaxime-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 15 [cited 2026 Jul. 16];16(7):59-6. Available from: https://www.jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/7860