The Neuro-Immune Axis in Ayurveda: An Integrative Analysis of the Vata–Manas–Ojas Triad and Modern Psychoneuroimmunology

Falguni Joshi; Udai Raj  Saroj; HML  Meena

doi:10.22270/jddt.v16i7.7830

Authors

Falguni Joshi Ph.D. Scholar, National institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-9039
Udai Raj Saroj Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-5677
HML Meena HOD and Prof, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Background: Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) has established that psychological stress influences immune function by activating the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system. Interestingly, classical Ayurveda appears to describe a functionally similar framework for mind–body–immune interaction through the interconnected concepts of Vata, Manas, and Ojas. Exploring these conceptual parallels may yield valuable insights into integrative models of health and disease. Objective: To examine the convergence between Ayurvedic concepts of neuroimmune regulation and contemporary psychoneuroimmunology, and to develop an integrative framework that links traditional Ayurvedic principles with modern biomedical mechanisms. Methods: A conceptual and comparative analysis was conducted using classical Ayurvedic literature, particularly the Charaka Samhita, alongside seminal theories of stress proposed by Hans Selye and contemporary research in psychoneuroimmunology. Key Ayurvedic constructs were systematically mapped onto recognized neuroendocrine and immunological pathways. Results: The analysis revealed significant functional parallels between Ayurvedic and modern neuroimmunological models. Vata was found to correspond closely with neural regulatory processes, Manas with psychological and cognitive functions, and Ojas with immune competence and systemic resilience. The Ayurvedic concept of Chittodvega (mental agitation) demonstrated notable similarities to chronic psychological stress, including dysregulation of the HPA axis and subsequent alterations in immune function. These interactions provide a coherent framework for understanding the development of stress-related inflammatory disorders, autoimmune diseases, and age-associated neuroimmune decline. Conclusion: Classical Ayurvedic literature presents a sophisticated conceptual model of mind–body–immune interactions that parallels key principles of modern psychoneuroimmunology. The Vata–Manas–Ojas triad offers a potentially valuable framework for understanding the neuroendocrine and immunological consequences of psychological stress. Future translational research integrating Ayurvedic theory with contemporary biomedical methodologies may enhance understanding of stress-related disorders and support the development of holistic therapeutic strategies. Keywords: Psychoneuroimmunology; Ayurveda; Vata; Manas; Ojas; Chittodvega; Stress; HPA Axis; Neuroimmune Regulation; Integrative Medicine.

Keywords:

Ayurveda, neuroimmunology, Vata, mana, HPA AXIS, OJAS

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i7.7830

Author Biographies

Falguni Joshi , Ph.D. Scholar, National institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur

Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Udai Raj Saroj, Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

HML Meena , HOD and Prof, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

HOD and Prof, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

References

1. Agnivesha, Charaka, Dridhabala. Charaka Samhita. Chakrapanidatta commentary, Ayurveda Dipika. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2014.

2. Selye H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature. 1936;138:32. https://doi.org/10.1038/138032a0

3. McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(3):171-179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380307 PMid:9428819

4. Chrousos GP. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5(7):374-381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2009.106 PMid:19488073

5. Ader R, Felten DL, Cohen N. Psychoneuroimmunology. 4th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000258380.48362.c9

6. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(1):55-89. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389 PMid:10696570

7. Dhabhar FS. Enhancing versus suppressive effects of stress on immune function: implications for immunoprotection and immunopathology. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2009;16(5):300-317. https://doi.org/10.1159/000216188 PMid:19571591 PMCid:PMC2790771

8. Lad V. Textbook of Ayurveda: Fundamental Principles. Albuquerque (NM): Ayurvedic Press; 2002.

9. Raison CL, Capuron L, Miller AH. Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the pathogenesis of depression. Trends Immunol. 2006;27(1):24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2005.11.006 PMid:16316783 PMCid:PMC3392963

10. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, McGuire L, Robles TF, Glaser R. Emotions, morbidity, and mortality: new perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:83-107 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135217 PMid:11752480