Computational Approaches to Molecular Docking and Protein Modeling in Drug Discovery
Abstract
Protein modeling and molecular docking are crucial computational methods in contemporary drug discovery. To identify potential therapeutic possibilities with high affinity and specificity, molecular docking predicts the ideal binding interactions between tiny molecules (ligands). The best binding interactions between target macromolecules, such proteins, and tiny molecules, or ligands, are predicted by molecular docking. When experimental structures are not accessible, protein modeling—including homology modeling and ab initio techniques—allows for the creation of three-dimensional protein structures. By cutting down on time and expense, these methods work together to expedite the drug discovery process. related to experimental techniques. This review explores the principles of molecular docking, emphasizing key algorithms, scoring functions, and software tools like AutoDock Vina and Discovery Studio. Additionally, it highlights advancements in protein modeling approaches, such as AlphaFold and comparative modeling, and their integration with docking workflows. By using these computational approaches, researchers can effectively predict binding mechanisms, find lead compounds, and improve drug design. The growing increases integration between molecular docking, protein modeling, and artificial intelligence holds promise for more accurate predictions and faster drug development processes in the pharmaceutical industry.
Keywords: Molecular Docking; Protein Modeling: AutoDock Vina.
Keywords:
Molecular Docking, Protein Modeling, AutoDock VinaDOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i6.7212References
1. Morris GM, Lim-Wilby M. Molecular docking. In: Kukol A, editor. Methods in molecular biology. Clifton NJ: Humana Press; 2008. p. 365–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-177-2_19
2. Mohanty M, Mohanty PS. Molecular docking in organic, inorganic, and hybrid systems: a tutorial review. Monatsh Chem. 2023;1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-023-03076-1
3. Dar AM, Mir S. Molecular docking: approaches, types, applications and basic challenges. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2017;8(2):1–3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9872.1000356
4. Creative Proteomics. Principles, processes and types of molecular docking [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 3]. Available from: https://www.iaanalysis.com/principles-processes-and-types-of-molecular-docking.html
5. Keval R, Tejas G. Basics, types and applications of molecular docking: a review. IP Int J Compr Adv Pharmacol. 2022;7(1):12–6. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcaap.2022.003
6. Rudimentary review on molecular docking: a beginner’s guide [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 12]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374588198_Rudimentary_Review_on_Molecular_Docking_A_Beginner's_Guide
7. Agu PC, Afiukwa CA, Orji OU, Ezeh EM, Ofoke IH, Ogbu CO, et al. Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40160-2
8. Goetz DH, Choe Y, Hansell E, Chen YT, McDowell M, Jonsson CB, et al. Substrate specificity profiling and identification of a new class of inhibitor for the major protease of the SARS coronavirus. Biochemistry. 2007;46(30):8744–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0621415
9. Senior AW, Evans R, Jumper J, Kirkpatrick J, Sifre L, Green T, et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature. 2020;577(7792):706–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7
10. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
11. AlQuraishi M. Machine learning in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2021;1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.04.005
12. Al-Lazikani B, Jung J, Xiang Z, Honig B. Protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2001;5(1):51–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00164-2
13. Agnihotry S, Pathak RK, Singh DB, Tiwari A, Hussain I. Protein structure prediction. In: Singh DB, Pathak RK, editors. Bioinformatics. Academic Press; 2022. p. 177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89775-4.00023-7
16. https://discover.3ds.com/discovery-studio-visualizer-download
18. https://sourceforge.net/projects/openbabel/
19. https://swissmodel.expasy.org/
20. https://github.com/android/camera-samples
21. https://colab.research.google.com/github/sokrypton/ColabFold/blob/main/AlphaFold2.ipynb
Published
Abstract Display: 1089 
PDF Downloads: 1510 PDF Downloads: 123 How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Monali Jagtap , Ghanshyam Girnar , Vanshika Ahuja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
.