In-Vitro Comparative Study of Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride and Montelukast Sodium Release Profiles in Xyzal M Suspension and Other Marketed Syrup Formulations

Authors

  • Devesh Kumar Joshi Medical Advisor, Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory Hyderabad
  • Krishna Chaitanya Veligandla Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India
  • Rahul Rathod Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India
  • Bhavesh P Kotak Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

Abstract

Objectives: In-vitro comparative analysis of the release profile of levocetirizine dihydrochloride and montelukast sodium in Xyzal M Suspension and three commercially available syrup formulations.

Method: The active components and their impurities were initially assayed in all formulations using a validated HPLC method. The enantiomeric impurities of montelukast sodium in different pH media were determined using the HPLC method specified in the United State Pharmacopoeia (USP) monograph. Additionally, dissolution studies and the soluble fractions of the components were evaluated in pH media that mimic the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. The particle size was also analyzed using microscopic analysis. All parameters were examined in fresh, stressed, and aged samples of each formulation.  

Results: The assay results indicate the claimed potency of formulations. The total and enantiomeric impurities meet the limits set by the Indian Pharmacopoeia (<2%) and USP monograph (<0.2%), respectively. The particle size analysis demonstrated that montelukast remained suspended throughout the Xyzal M suspension. Levocetirizine in all formulations exhibited a soluble fraction of >70% after 1 and 24 hours in various pH media. For montelukast, the soluble fraction exceeded 50% in all syrup formulations. However, in Xyzal M suspension, montelukast was found to be 100% insoluble in all pH media after 1 and 24 hours, except in simulated intestinal fluid (~40-45%) after 24 hours. The absence of S-enantiomer, even in simulated intestinal fluid, indicates its presence in the pharmacologically active form.  

Conclusion: Xyzal M suspension is a promising dosage formulation for achieving desired pharmacological action, outperforming the syrup formulations.

Keywords: Levocetirizine dihydrochloride, Montelukast sodium, Release profile, Suspension, Syrup, S-enantiomer

Keywords:

Levocetirizine dihydrochloride, Montelukast sodium, Release profile, Suspension, Syrup, S-enantiomer

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i8.6164

Author Biographies

Devesh Kumar Joshi, Medical Advisor, Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory Hyderabad

Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

Krishna Chaitanya Veligandla, Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

Rahul Rathod, Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

Bhavesh P Kotak, Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

Department of Medical Affairs, Dr Reddy’s Laboratory, Hyderabad, India

References

Moon SJ, Yu KS, Jung J, Kim YI, Kim MG. Comparative pharmacokinetics of a montelukast/levocetirizine fixed-dose combination chewable tablet versus individual administration of montelukast and levocetirizine after a single oral administration in healthy Korean male subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 58(6):354-62. https://doi.org/10.5414/CP203709

Agha DS, EL-Zien HI. Solid state compatibility studies between montelukast sodium and levocetirizine. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018. 11(3):368-74. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i3.22990

Wang L, Sun Y, Kuang C, Zhang X. Preparation and evaluation of taste masked oral suspension of arbidol hydrochloride. asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2015; 10(1):73-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2014.07.001

Kim DW, Kim YH, Yousaf AM, Kim DS, Kwon TK, Park JH, Kim YI, Park JH, Jin SG, Kim KS, Cho KH. Novel montelukast sodium-loaded stable oral suspension bioequivalent to the commercial granules in rats. Archives of pharmacal research. 2016; 39:539-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-015-0664-x

Charoo NA, Abdallah DB, Ahmed DT, Abrahamsson B, Cristofoletti R, Langguth P, Mehta M, Parr A, Polli JE, Shah VP, Kambayashi A. Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2023; 112(4):893-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2022.12.021

Okumu A, DiMaso M, Löbenberg R. Dynamic dissolution testing to establish in vitro/in vivo correlations for montelukast sodium, a poorly soluble drug. Pharmaceutical research. 2008; 25:2778-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-008-9642-z

Mahajan HS, Gundare SA. Preparation, characterization and pulmonary pharmacokinetics of xyloglucan microspheres as dry powder inhalation. Carbohydrate polymers. 2014; 102:529-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.036

Muppavarapu R, Guttikar S, Rajappan M, Kamarajan K, Mullangi R. Sensitive LC‐MS/MS‐ESI method for simultaneous determination of montelukast and fexofenadine in human plasma: application to a bioequivalence study. Biomedical Chromatography. 2014; 28(8):1048-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.3114

Barbosa JS, Almeida Paz FA, Braga SS. Montelukast medicines of today and tomorrow: from molecular pharmaceutics to technological formulations. Drug Delivery. 2016; 23(9):3257-65. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2016.1170247

Kumar RS, Yagnesh TN. Pharmaceutical suspensions: patient compliance oral dosage forms. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 7(12):1471-537.

USP-NF Montelukast Sodium. https://doi.org/10.31003/USPNF_M54774_04_01

USP-NF Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride. https://doi.org/10.31003/USPNF_M3460_05_01

Indian pharmacopoeia. Montelukast Sodium and Levocetirizine Hydrochloride Tablets. 2018. P. 2633.

Lee HR, Park HJ, Park JS, Park DW, Ho MJ, Kim DY, Lee HC, Kim EJ, Song WH, Park JS, Choi YS. Montelukast microsuspension with hypromellose for improved stability and oral absorption. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2021; 183:1732-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.151

Wang D, Zhou C, Cong R, Li Y, Wang X. Simultaneous determination of Montelukast sodium S-enantiomer and A5 enantiomers in Montelukast sodium bulk drug by normal-phase chiral HPLC. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017; 79(1):139-48. https://doi.org/10.4172/pharmaceutical-sciences.1000210

Maddala VL, Kakumani KK, Chimalakonda KR, Polisetty S, Ray PC. Isolation and characterization of S-enantiomer in montelukast. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2013; 4:56-61 https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2013.41008

Walsh GM. Levocetirizine: an update. Curr Med Chem. 2006; 13(22):2711-5. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986706778201594

Narin I, Sarioglan S, Anilanmert B, Sari H. pKa determinations for montelukast sodium and levo dropropizine. Journal of solution chemistry. 2010. 39:1582-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-010-9604-z

Published

2023-08-15
Statistics
Abstract Display: 1324
PDF Downloads: 930
PDF Downloads: 399

How to Cite

1.
Joshi DK, Veligandla KC, Rathod R, Kotak BP. In-Vitro Comparative Study of Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride and Montelukast Sodium Release Profiles in Xyzal M Suspension and Other Marketed Syrup Formulations. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 15 [cited 2025 Dec. 16];13(8):32-44. Available from: https://www.jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/6164

How to Cite

1.
Joshi DK, Veligandla KC, Rathod R, Kotak BP. In-Vitro Comparative Study of Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride and Montelukast Sodium Release Profiles in Xyzal M Suspension and Other Marketed Syrup Formulations. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 15 [cited 2025 Dec. 16];13(8):32-44. Available from: https://www.jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/6164