Available online on 15.09.2026 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2026 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                                        Review Article

Formulation, Evaluation and Optimization of Metformin Hydrochloride 500 mg Sustained-Release Tablets Using a Quality-By-Design Approach: A Comprehensive Review

Rahul Dev 1, Dharmendra Sahu 1, Ruchi Gupta 1, Niharika Sahu 2, Rupesh Sahu 3, Shiv Kumar Bhardwaj 3*

1 Gracious College of Pharmacy, Village-Belbhata, Abhanpur, Raipur-493661, Chhattisgarh, India

2 Columbia College of Pharmacy, Columbia Professional University, Tekari, Near Vidhansabha Road, Raipur-493111, Chhattisgarh, India

3 Columbia Institute of Pharmacy, Columbia Professional University, Tekari, Near Vidhansabha Road, Raipur-493111, Chhattisgarh, India

Article Info:

_____________________________________________Article History:

Received 17 June 2026 

Reviewed 03 Aug 2026 

Accepted 27 Aug 2026 

Published 15 Sep 2026 

_____________________________________________

Cite this article as:

Dev R, Sahu D, Gupta R, Sahu N, Sahu R, Bhardwaj SK, Formulation, Evaluation and Optimization of Metformin Hydrochloride 500 mg Sustained-Release Tablets Using a Quality-By-Design Approach: A Comprehensive Review, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2026; 16(9):237-251         DOI: https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i9.7987                                                        _____________________________________________

For Correspondence: 

Shiv Kumar Bhardwaj, Columbia Institute of Pharmacy, Columbia Professional University, Tekari, Near Vidhansabha Road, Raipur-493111, Chhattisgarh, India.

Abstract

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Metformin hydrochloride is a first-line oral antihyperglycemic agent widely used for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite its therapeutic effectiveness, its high aqueous solubility, relatively limited membrane permeability, dose-related gastrointestinal effects and restricted intestinal absorption window can complicate the development of prolonged-release oral formulations. Sustained-release (SR) matrix tablets provide a rational strategy for controlling drug release, reducing dosing frequency, improving dosing convenience and maintaining more consistent systemic exposure. This review presents a Quality-by-Design (QbD)-oriented framework for the formulation, evaluation and optimization of 500-mg metformin hydrochloride SR matrix tablets. The framework incorporates the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP), Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), Critical Material Attributes (CMAs), Critical Process Parameters (CPPs), risk assessment, Design of Experiments (DoE), formulation optimization and lifecycle control. Particular emphasis is placed on hydrophilic matrix systems containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), together with the roles of hydrophobic and natural polymers and functional excipients. Key formulation and process variables, including polymer concentration, viscosity grade, drug-to-polymer ratio, compression force, porosity and manufacturing conditions, are considered in relation to matrix hydration, gel formation, diffusion, erosion and drug-release behavior. Evaluation includes pre-formulation, powder properties, tablet quality, assay, content uniformity, compatibility, swelling, dissolution, release kinetics and stability. Emerging tools such as process analytical technology, physiologically based biopharmaceutic modeling, artificial intelligence, machine learning and continuous manufacturing may further enhance predictive development, robustness, scalability, and lifecycle control of metformin SR tablets.

Keywords: Metformin Hydrochloride; Sustained-Release Tablets; Quality By Design; Design Of Experiments; Matrix Tablets.

 

 


Highlights

AI, machine learning, PBBM, PAT and continuous manufacturing provide opportunities for predictive development.

  1. Introduction

Metformin hydrochloride is a widely used biguanide antihyperglycemic drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its primary glucose-lowering effect is attributed to suppression of hepatic glucose production, along with effects on peripheral glucose utilization and gastrointestinal mechanisms.1 Despite its established efficacy, metformin presents formulation challenges because of its high aqueous solubility and relatively low intestinal permeability. It is generally classified as a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class III drug. Rapid dissolution after gastrointestinal exposure therefore makes controlled drug release difficult.2 Sustained-release (SR) formulations are developed to prolong drug release, reduce dosing frequency and improve patient convenience. Hydrophilic matrix tablets containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) are widely investigated for this purpose. HPMC hydrates in gastrointestinal fluid and forms a viscous gel barrier through which dissolved metformin diffuses. Drug release is influenced by polymer concentration and viscosity, drug loading, tablet porosity, compression force and manufacturing conditions.3 Quality by Design (QbD) provides a systematic approach to formulation development by integrating predefined product objectives, risk assessment, Design of Experiments (DoE) and process understanding. For metformin SR tablets, QbD establishes relationships among the Quality Target Product Profile, Critical Quality Attributes, Critical Material Attributes and Critical Process Parameters. This approach facilitates optimization and supports development of robust, reproducible 500-mg metformin hydrochloride SR tablets.4

  1. Pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical characteristics of metformin hydrochloride

Metformin hydrochloride is a hydrophilic biguanide compound characterized by high aqueous solubility and comparatively low membrane permeability. These characteristics strongly influence the design of modified-release dosage forms. High solubility represents a major formulation challenge because dissolved drug can rapidly migrate through a hydrated polymeric matrix. Therefore, the release-controlling polymer must create adequate diffusional resistance without preventing complete drug release.5 Metformin is generally classified as a BCS Class III drug because of high solubility and low permeability. Consequently, both dissolution and permeability should be considered when interpreting the performance of an SR formulation.6



Table 1. Pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical characteristics of metformin hydrochloride7–9

Characteristic

Description

Formulation relevance

Active ingredient

Metformin hydrochloride

Therapeutic API

Strength

500 mg

Determines drug loading

Drug class

Biguanide antihyperglycemic

Therapeutic application

Aqueous solubility

High

May promote rapid dissolution

BCS classification

Class III

High solubility and low permeability

Intestinal permeability

Relatively low

Important for absorption

Main formulation challenge

Controlled release of soluble drug

Requires effective matrix

Preferred approach

Polymeric matrix system

Controls drug diffusion

Major release mechanisms

Diffusion, swelling, gel formation, erosion

Determines dissolution behavior

 


  1. Rationale and advantages of sustained-release metformin tablets

The primary objective of metformin hydrochloride SR tablets is to achieve controlled and prolonged drug release with consistent tablet quality. Since metformin is highly water soluble, controlled water penetration, polymer hydration, swelling, gel formation and drug diffusion are essential to prevent rapid release. SR formulations can reduce dosing frequency, improve convenience and adherence and provide predictable drug release.10 Drug-release behavior depends on polymer type and concentration, viscosity, tablet porosity, compression force, hydration, diffusion, and erosion. An optimized formulation should provide a balanced and reproducible release profile, avoid excessive initial release and maintain matrix integrity, mechanical strength, manufacturing consistency and stability.11

  1. Quality-By-Design (QbD) framework for metformin sustained-release tablets

QbD begins with predefined product objectives and establishes relationships among formulation composition, manufacturing process, product attributes and performance.

Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) defines the desired quality safety, efficacy and performance of a metformin hydrochloride 500-mg SR tablet. It includes an oral sustained-release dosage form, 500-mg strength, acceptable appearance, consistent assay and content uniformity, adequate hardness and low friability, controlled and reproducible drug release, and satisfactory physical and chemical stability throughout the shelf life. These targets guide the identification of CQAs, CMAs and CPPs and support development of an effective formulation and process control strategy.12

4.2 Critical quality attributes (CQA)

Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) are the physical, chemical and performance characteristics that must remain within predefined limits to ensure the quality and performance of metformin hydrochloride 500-mg SR tablets. Key CQAs include appearance, weight, thickness, hardness, friability, assay, content uniformity, moisture content, dissolution, drug-release kinetics and stability. Among these, dissolution is particularly critical because it determines the controlled and sustained drug-release performance of the formulation.13

4.3 Critical material attributes (CMA)

Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) are the physical, chemical and functional properties of the API and excipients that influence the CQAs of metformin hydrochloride SR tablets. Key CMAs include polymer type, concentration, viscosity grade, drug and excipient particle size, binder and lubricant concentration, moisture content and excipient functionality. Among these, polymer characteristics are most critical because they control matrix formation, hydration, gel strength, drug diffusion and the dissolution profile.14

4.4 Critical process parameters (CPP)

Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) are manufacturing variables that can significantly affect the CQAs and performance of metformin hydrochloride SR tablets. Key CPPs include mixing time and speed, granulation endpoint, binder addition, drying temperature and time, residual moisture, milling, lubrication time, compression force and compression speed. These parameters influence blend uniformity, granule properties, tablet porosity, mechanical strength, polymer distribution and drug-release profile. CPPs should therefore be identified through risk assessment and systematically evaluated to establish a robust and reproducible manufacturing process.15

Risk assessment can be performed using: Failure mode and effects analysis, ishikawa diagram, risk-ranking matrix, cause-and-effect analysis, hazard analysis.16 Figure 1. QbD framework for the development of metformin hydrochloride 500-mg SR tablets. The figure illustrates the sequential integration of QTPP, CQAs, risk assessment, CMAs, CPPs, DoE, formulation optimization, design space, evaluation, control strategy, and lifecycle management. Figure 1 QbD-based development and optimization of metformin 500 mg sustained-release tablets.
The figure illustrates the systematic progression from QTPP and CQAs through risk assessment, DoE, formulation optimization, and design space, leading to the optimized product, followed by evaluation, control strategy and lifecycle management.

Figure 1. Flow diagram represents various steps involved in QbD framework for metformin 500 mg SR tablet development

(Integrated QbD pathway connecting product objectives, risk assessment, material and process variables, optimization, evaluation, control strategy and lifecycle management).


 

 

 

Table 2. QTPP, CQAs, CMAs and CPPs for metformin SR tablets17–22

QbD Component

Example

Importance

QTPP

500-mg oral SR tablet

Defines target product

CQA

Dissolution

Determines release performance

CQA

Assay

Ensures drug-content accuracy

CQA

Content uniformity

Ensures dose consistency

CQA

Friability

Indicates mechanical integrity

CMA

Polymer concentration

Controls release rate

CMA

Polymer viscosity

Influences gel strength

CMA

Binder concentration

Influences matrix structure

CPP

Mixing time

Affects blend uniformity

CPP

Granulation endpoint

Affects granule properties

CPP

Drying conditions

Affects moisture

CPP

Compression force

Affects hardness and porosity

CPP

Lubrication time

May affect tablet ability and wetting

 


  1. Formulation strategies and polymer selection

Polymer selection is a major determinant of sustained-release performance because polymers influence water penetration, hydration, swelling, gel strength, diffusion and erosion.

5.1 HPMC

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is a widely used hydrophilic matrix-forming polymer for sustained-release tablets. On contact with aqueous media, HPMC hydrates and forms a viscous gel layer that controls metformin release by increasing diffusional resistance. Higher polymer concentrations generally strengthen the gel and may prolong drug release. Different viscosity grades, such as HPMC K4M, K15M and K100M, can produce different release profiles due to differences in hydration and gel formation. For 500-mg metformin hydrochloride SR tablets, HPMC K15M has been reported as an important formulation variable influencing drug release, highlighting its significance in formulation optimization.23

5.2 PVP

Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), particularly PVP K30, is commonly used as a binder in matrix-tablet formulations. It improves granule formation, compressibility and mechanical properties and may also influence matrix porosity and, consequently, drug dissolution and release. PVP K30 has been investigated in combination with HPMC K15M in optimized 500-mg metformin hydrochloride sustained-release formulations, supporting its relevance as a formulation variable in the development of metformin SR tablets.24

5.3 Ethyl cellulose

Ethyl cellulose is a hydrophobic polymer that can reduce water penetration into the tablet matrix and retard drug diffusion. It may be used independently or in combination with hydrophilic polymers such as HPMC to modify and control the drug-release profile.25

5.4 Natural polymers

Natural polymers such as xanthan gum and guar gum can form hydrated matrices and retard drug diffusion, making them useful as natural release-controlling agents in sustained-release formulations. However, their performance may be affected by source variability, viscosity variation, hydration characteristics, microbial quality and compositional variability; therefore, these attributes should be carefully controlled to ensure consistent formulation performance.26

5.5 Polymer combinations

Combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers can provide greater flexibility in controlling the drug-release profile. Such combinations can modulate water penetration, polymer swelling, drug diffusion and matrix erosion, thereby enabling more precise control of sustained drug release.27


 

 

 

 

Table 3. Polymers and their role in sustained drug release

Polymer

Type

Major function

Expected effect

ReF.

HPMC

Hydrophilic

Gel/matrix formation

Retards drug diffusion

28

PVP K30

Hydrophilic binder

Binding and granulation

Modifies matrix structure

29

Ethyl cellulose

Hydrophobic

Diffusion barrier

Reduces water penetration

30

Xanthan gum

Natural hydrophilic

Swelling and gel formation

Retards release

31

Guar gum

Natural hydrophilic

Matrix formation

Controls diffusion

32

Polymer combinations

Mixed

Combined release control

Enables profile optimization

33

 


  1. Manufacturing methods and critical process parameters

The manufacturing process influences granule properties, tablet density, porosity, mechanical strength, polymer distribution and drug-release behavior.

6.1 Direct compression34

Direct compression involves blending the API and excipients followed by compression into tablets without an intermediate granulation step. It is a simple manufacturing approach, but successful production requires adequate powder flow, minimal segregation, good compressibility, blend uniformity and uniform polymer distribution to ensure consistent tablet quality and reproducible sustained drug-release performance.

Advantages35

Critical Considerations36

6.2 Wet granulation37

Wet granulation is widely used to improve powder flow, compressibility and blend uniformity by forming granules. The process includes binder addition, granulation, drying, sizing, lubrication and compression. Key process variables include binder concentration, addition rate, granulation time and endpoint, drying temperature and time, residual moisture and milling conditions. Proper control of these variables is essential because they affect granule properties, tablet porosity, mechanical strength and ultimately the sustained-release profile of metformin hydrochloride tablets.

6.3 Dry granulation38

Dry granulation may be useful when moisture exposure is undesirable. Roller compaction or slugging can produce compacted material that is subsequently milled and compressed.

6.4 Compression parameters

Compression force is a critical process parameter affecting tablet hardness, porosity, thickness, mechanical strength, water penetration, polymer hydration and drug release. Higher compression force generally produces harder, less porous tablets, which may slow hydration and drug diffusion. Insufficient compression can result in weak tablets, capping, chipping and increased friability. Therefore, an optimum compression force should be established to balance mechanical strength and the desired sustained-release profile.39

  1. Design of experiments and formulation optimization

DoE allows several formulation and process variables to be investigated simultaneously and provides information regarding main effects, interactions and nonlinear relationships.

7.1 Factorial design

Factorial design is a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach in which multiple formulation or process variables are investigated simultaneously at predefined levels. It is particularly useful for screening important factors during early formulation development, identifying their individual effects and interactions and determining which variables require further optimization. In metformin SR tablet development, factors such as polymer concentration, binder concentration, compression force, or other critical formulation variables can be systematically evaluated against responses such as hardness, friability, swelling and drug release.40

7.2 Box-Behnken design

Box–Behnken Design (BBD) is a Response Surface Methodology (RSM) used to study the effects of multiple formulation or process variables. It evaluates linear, interaction and quadratic effects with fewer experimental runs than many full factorial designs. In metformin SR tablet development, BBD can optimize factors such as polymer concentration, binder concentration and compression force and evaluate their effects on drug release, hardness, friability and swelling index.41

7.3 Central composite design

Central composite design (CCD) is a Response Surface Methodology (RSM) used for formulation optimization. It evaluates linear, interaction and quadratic effects of formulation and process variables on product responses. In metformin SR tablet development, CCD can optimize factors such as polymer concentration, binder concentration and compression force against responses including drug release, hardness, friability and swelling behavior, helping identify optimal formulation and process conditions.42

7.4 Response-surface methodology

For metformin hydrochloride SR tablets, HPMC concentration, PVP concentration, hydrophobic-polymer concentration, and compression force can be selected as independent variables for DoE-based optimization. Their effects can be assessed using responses such as drug release at selected time points, T₅₀%, hardness, friability, and swelling index. These variables and responses help establish the relationship between formulation composition, manufacturing conditions, tablet properties, and sustained-release performance.43

7.5 Desirability-based optimization

A desirability function can simultaneously optimize multiple formulation responses by combining individual responses to identify the best overall formulation. For metformin SR tablets, objectives include minimizing initial burst release, achieving desired drug release, maintaining adequate hardness, and minimizing friability. The predicted optimized formulation should be prepared and experimentally evaluated, and the observed results compared with predicted values to validate the optimization model.44

  1. Evaluation and characterization of metformin SR tablets

Evaluation should comprehensively cover precompression properties, post compression properties, drug content, compatibility, solid-state characterization, swelling, dissolution, release kinetics, and stability.

8.1 Precompression evaluation

Angle of repose

Angle of repose is a precompression parameter used to evaluate powder flowability. A lower angle generally indicates better flow, although the result depends on the powder properties and measurement method.45

Where:

θ = Angle of repose

h = Height of the powder heap

r = Radius of the powder heap

Alternatively, when diameter D is measured:

Interpretation: A lower angle generally indicates better powder flow.

Bulk density

Bulk density represents the mass of powder occupying a given bulk volume before tapping.46

Tapped density

Tapped density is the mass of powder divided by its volume after standardized tapping. It indicates the packing characteristics, flowability and compressibility of the powder before tablet compression.47

Tapped Density= 

Where:

Mass of powder = weight of the powder sample

Tapped volume = volume occupied by the powder after standardized tapping

Carr's compressibility index

Carr's compressibility index is a precompression parameter used to evaluate powder flow and compressibility based on the difference between bulk density and tapped density.48

Carr’s Index (%) = ×100

Where:

Tapped Density = density after standardized tapping

Bulk Density = density before tapping

Hausner ratio

Hausner ratio is a precompression parameter used to evaluate powder flowability and interparticle friction. It is calculated from the ratio of tapped density to bulk density.49

Hausner Ratio =

Where:

Tapped Density = density after standardized tapping

Bulk Density = density before tapping

Moisture content

Moisture content is a precompression parameter that measures the amount of water present in powders or granules. It can affect flow, granule strength, compressibility, polymer hydration, tablet stability and drug-release behavior.50

Where:

Initial Weight = weight of sample before drying

Final Dry Weight = weight of sample after drying to constant weight

Particle-size distribution

Particle size is an important pre-formulation parameter that affects powder flow, packing, blend uniformity, compressibility, surface area and dissolution. Differences in particle size can cause segregation and dose-uniformity issues, while changes in surface area may alter drug dissolution. Therefore, controlled particle-size distribution is essential for consistent manufacturing and reproducible drug release.51

8.2 Post-compression evaluation

Appearance

Visual inspection of tablets is performed to assess color, shape, surface defects, capping, cracking, chipping, lamination and mottling. It provides a preliminary indication of tablet quality, manufacturing consistency and physical integrity.52

Weight Variation

Weight variation is evaluated by weighing individual tablets and comparing them with the mean tablet weight. It assesses weight uniformity and manufacturing consistency and helps detect variations during feeding, blending, granulation or compression.53

 

Thickness

Tablet thickness is measured using a calibrated thickness gauge or vernier caliper to assess dimensional uniformity. It is influenced by compression force, tablet weight, punch geometry, and granule properties. Consistent thickness indicates uniform tablet quality and reproducible manufacturing performance.54

Diameter

For round tablets, diameter should remain consistent within the specified manufacturing tolerance to ensure dimensional uniformity and reproducible tablet quality. Variations in diameter may indicate inconsistencies in tablet compression, granule properties, or manufacturing conditions55

Hardness

Tablet hardness is the resistance of a tablet to mechanical deformation during handling, packaging, transportation, and storage. Excessive hardness may reduce porosity and water penetration, delaying polymer hydration and drug release. Therefore, an appropriate hardness range should balance mechanical strength and desired dissolution performance.56

Friability

Friability measures the resistance of tablets to abrasion and mechanical stress during handling, packaging, and transportation. Hardness and friability should be evaluated together because adequate mechanical strength alone does not establish the sustained-release performance of the formulation. An appropriate balance between tablet strength, friability, porosity and drug-release behavior is therefore required. It is calculated as:57

Friability (%) = ×100

8.3 Assay

Assay determines the amount of metformin hydrochloride present in the finished tablet and confirms the drug content. Common methods include UV–visible spectrophotometry and HPLC. HPLC offers greater specificity when separating metformin from excipients, impurities, or degradation products. The analytical method should demonstrate specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity, range and robustness for reliable drug quantification.58

8.4 Content uniformity

Content uniformity determines the metformin hydrochloride content in individual tablets and assesses dose consistency. It involves individual tablet analysis, mean content calculation, variability assessment and comparison with pharmacopoeial acceptance criteria. This ensures uniform and accurate drug delivery from each SR tablet.59

 

 

 

8.5 FTIR compatibility study

FTIR spectroscopy is used to assess potential drug-excipient interactions in metformin SR formulations. Spectra of the pure drug, excipients, physical mixture and optimized formulation are compared for changes in characteristic peaks. Retention of major peaks generally indicates compatibility, while new peaks, major shifts, or disappearance of peaks may suggest interactions. However, minor peak shifts should be interpreted with complementary techniques such as DSC and XRD.60

8.6 Differential scanning calorimetry

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) evaluates the melting behavior, thermal transitions, crystallinity, drug–excipient interactions and physical-state changes of metformin hydrochloride formulations. Comparing the pure drug, physical mixture and optimized formulation helps detect significant thermal changes and provides evidence of drug–excipient compatibility and solid-state stability.61

8.7 X-Ray Diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) is used to characterize the crystalline or amorphous nature of metformin hydrochloride and the optimized formulation. Changes in diffraction patterns may indicate reduced crystallinity, amorphization, polymorphic transformation, or other solid-state changes.62

8.8 Swelling Index

Swelling studies are particularly important for hydrophilic matrix tablets because they assess the ability of the polymer to absorb water and form a hydrated gel layer. The swelling index is calculated as:63

Swelling Index (%)=

where W0 is the initial tablet weight and Wt is the weight of the hydrated tablet at time t. Swelling studies provide information about water uptake, polymer hydration, gel formation, and matrix integrity, which are important factors governing the sustained-release behavior of metformin tablets.

8.9 In-Vitro dissolution testing

Dissolution testing is the most important performance evaluation for SR tablets because it determines the rate and extent of metformin release. A suitable method should be reproducible, discriminatory and scientifically justified. Tablets are placed in a suitable dissolution apparatus and medium under controlled temperature and agitation. Samples are withdrawn at predetermined intervals and analyzed using a validated method. Cumulative drug release is calculated and plotted against time. Sampling should cover the initial, intermediate and final stages to adequately characterize the complete SR profile.64

8.10 Dissolution-profile comparison

Dissolution profiles of metformin hydrochloride SR tablets can be evaluated using cumulative drug release, difference factor (f₁), similarity factor (f₂), model-independent methods and kinetic models. The f₁ factor measures the percentage difference between test and reference profiles, while the f₂ factor assesses the similarity or closeness of the two dissolution profiles.65

The similarity factor is calculated as:

                                                    f2=50log{1+n1t=1∑n(Rt−Tt)2}−0.5×100

where Rₜ represents the reference dissolution value, Tₜ represents the test dissolution value at time point t and n is the number of sampling points. A higher f₂ value indicates greater similarity, while f₁ indicates the difference between dissolution profiles. These factors, along with release-kinetic models, help characterize and compare the performance of metformin SR formulations.

Table 4. Evaluation parameters and their scientific significance66–70

Evaluation parameter

Scientific significance

Angle of repose

Powder-flow assessment

Bulk density

Powder-packing behavior

Tapped density

Packing after tapping

Carr's index

Compressibility/flow

Hausner ratio

Interparticle friction/flow

Particle size

Flow, packing and dissolution

Moisture content

Stability and processing

Appearance

Visible tablet quality

Weight variation

Manufacturing consistency

Thickness

Dimensional uniformity

Diameter

Dimensional consistency

Hardness

Mechanical strength

Friability

Abrasion resistance

Assay

Overall drug content

Content uniformity

Unit-to-unit dose consistency

FTIR

Drug–excipient compatibility

DSC

Thermal characterization

XRD

Solid-state characterization

Swelling index

Matrix hydration

Dissolution

Drug-release performance

Release kinetics

Mechanistic interpretation

Stability

Quality during storage

 

  1. Dissolution, drug-release kinetics and mechanism

Drug release from hydrophilic metformin matrix tablets generally involves several interconnected mechanisms.

Water penetration

Water penetration is the initial step in drug release from a hydrophilic matrix tablet. It allows the dissolution medium to enter the tablet, promoting polymer hydration, swelling, and gel-layer formation. The rate of water penetration subsequently influences metformin diffusion and drug release.71

Polymer hydration

Hydrophilic polymers absorb water and hydrate, causing swelling and formation of a hydrated gel layer. This gel barrier controls water penetration and metformin diffusion, thereby providing sustained drug release.72

Matrix swelling

Hydration causes polymer swelling and matrix expansion, increasing the gel-layer thickness and helping control water penetration and metformin diffusion.73

Gel-layer formation

A viscous gel layer forms around the hydrated tablet, creating diffusional resistance that controls metformin movement into the dissolution medium and provides sustained drug release.74

Drug dissolution

Metformin dissolves within the hydrated polymer matrix and then diffuses through the gel layer into the surrounding dissolution medium, contributing to controlled drug release.75

 

Drug diffusion

Dissolved metformin diffuses through the hydrated polymer gel layer into the dissolution medium. The gel acts as a diffusional barrier, slowing drug movement and providing controlled, sustained release.76

Polymer relaxation and erosion

Continued hydration causes polymer relaxation and gradual matrix erosion, reducing diffusional resistance and promoting the further release of metformin from the SR tablet.77 Figure 2. Mechanism of controlled drug release from metformin SR matrix tablets.

Figure 2. Mechanism of metformin release from hydrophilic matrix tablet

(Sequential representation of hydration, swelling, gel formation, diffusion, polymer relaxation, and erosion during metformin release.)

Drug-release kinetic analysis

Zero-order model

The zero-order model describes relatively constant drug release with time, indicating that the release rate is largely independent of the amount of drug remaining in the dosage form.78

First-order model

The first-order model describes drug release according to the amount of drug remaining in the dosage form, with the release rate decreasing as the amount of unreleased drug decreases.79

 

Higuchi model

The Higuchi model describes diffusion-controlled drug release from matrix systems, where the amount of drug released is proportional to the square root of time.80

Korsmeyer-peppas model

where Mt/M∞ represents the fraction of drug released at time t, K is the release-rate constant, and n provides information about the release mechanism. Interpretation of n depends on the dosage-form geometry and assumptions of the model.81


 

Table 5. Drug-release models and their interpretation

Model

Mathematical expression

Main interpretation

Zero-order

Qt=Q0+K0t

Constant release rate

First-order

Log-based release relationship

Release related to drug remaining

Higuchi

Q=KHt

Diffusion-controlled release

Korsmeyer-Peppas

Mt/M∞=Ktn

Mechanistic release assessment

 


  1. Stability, analytical method validation and regulatory considerations

Stability studies

Stability studies determine whether the optimized metformin SR formulation maintains its physical, chemical and performance characteristics during storage. Key parameters include appearance, assay, dissolution, hardness, friability, moisture content, degradation products and physical characteristics.82

Analytical method validation

Analytical methods for assay and dissolution should be fit for their intended purpose and demonstrate specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity and range, robustness and suitable detection/quantitation capability.83

Regulatory Considerations

The QbD framework incorporates ICH Q8 for Pharmaceutical Development, ICH Q9 for Quality Risk Management, ICH Q10 for the Pharmaceutical Quality System, ICH Q14 for Analytical Procedure Development, ICH Q2(R2) for Analytical Procedure Validation, and ICH Q1A for Stability Testing. These guidelines support systematic development, risk management, analytical control and product stability. The overall control strategy can be represented as:84

Raw Material Control → Process Control → In-Process Testing → Finished Product Testing → Stability Monitoring → Lifecycle Management

  1. Advanced approaches: AI, machine learning, PBBM, PAT and continuous manufacturing

Artificial intelligence and machine learning can complement conventional statistical methods when formulation behavior is nonlinear.

Artificial neural networks

Artificial neural network (ANN) models can be used to capture nonlinear relationships between formulation variables and dissolution responses, making them useful for predicting drug-release behavior and supporting formulation optimization of metformin hydrochloride SR tablets.85

Machine learning

Machine-learning algorithms can analyze formulation, process and dissolution datasets to predict product performance, identify influential variables and support data-driven optimization of metformin hydrochloride SR tablet formulations.86

Physiologically based biopharmaceutic modeling(PBBM)

Physiologically based biopharmaceutic modeling (PBBM) can integrate in-vitro dissolution data with gastrointestinal physiology and pharmacokinetic behavior, helping predict how formulation-dependent drug release may influence in-vivo drug exposure and support formulation optimization.87

Process analytical technology

Process analytical technology (PAT) enables real-time or near-real-time monitoring of critical material attributes and process parameters during manufacturing. In metformin SR tablet development, PAT can be applied to monitor blend uniformity, moisture content, granule properties, compression behavior and tablet characteristics, helping detect process variability and maintain consistent product quality.88

Continuous manufacturing

Continuous manufacturing integrates material feeding, blending, granulation, drying and compression into an interconnected production process. This approach can improve process consistency, reduce process variability, enable continuous monitoring and support more efficient manufacturing of metformin hydrochloride sustained-release tablets. Figure 3. Integrated QbD–DoE–AI/ML framework for predictive optimization and lifecycle management of metformin SR tablets.89

Figure 3. Flow diagram represents various steps involved in integrated DoE–QbD–AI-based optimization strategy

(Integrated QbD, DoE, statistical modeling, AI/ML, dissolution prediction, PBBM, PAT and continuous manufacturing strategy for predictive optimization).

  1. Future perspectives

Future development of metformin hydrochloride SR tablets should progress from empirical optimization toward predictive and mechanistic formulation science. Integration of QbD with AI and ML can help predict complex relationships between formulation variables, process conditions, tablet properties and drug release. Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutic Modeling (PBBM) can link in-vitro dissolution with gastrointestinal physiology and pharmacokinetic performance. Process Analytical Technology (PAT) and continuous manufacturing can support real-time monitoring, improved process control and reduced manufacturing variability. Future research should emphasize the integrated application of these technologies for predictive formulation design, robust manufacturing and optimized drug-release performance.

QbD + DoE + Dissolution Modeling + AI/ML + PBBM + PAT + Continuous Manufacturing

The ultimate objective is to establish predictive relationships across the complete development pathway:

Material Attributes → Process Parameters → Tablet Structure → Dissolution → Pharmacokinetics → Product Performance

 

  1. Conclusion

Metformin hydrochloride 500-mg SR matrix tablets require careful control of formulation composition, polymer properties, manufacturing conditions and drug-release behavior. Due to its high solubility and relatively low permeability, achieving controlled release is challenging. HPMC-based hydrophilic matrices regulate drug release through hydration, swelling, gel formation, diffusion, polymer relaxation and erosion. Comprehensive evaluation of precompression properties, tablet characteristics, assay, content uniformity, FTIR, DSC, XRD, swelling, dissolution, release kinetics and stability is essential. The QbD approach integrates QTPP, CQAs, CMAs, CPPs, risk assessment, DoE, optimization, design space and control strategy. Future integration of AI/ML, PBBM, PAT and continuous manufacturing may further improve prediction, process control, consistency and lifecycle management.

Abbreviation

AI :  Artificial Intelligence

ANN : Artificial Neural Network

API : Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient

BBD ; Box–Behnken Design

BCS : Biopharmaceutics Classification System

CCD : Central Composite Design

CMA : Critical Material Attribute

CPP : Critical Process Parameter

CQA : Critical Quality Attribute

DoE : Design of Experiments

DSC : Differential Scanning Calorimetry

f₁ : Difference Factor

f₂ : Similarity Factor

FTIR : Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

HPMC : Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose

ICH : International Council for Harmonisation

ML : Machine Learning

PAT : Process Analytical Technology

PBBM : Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutic Modeling

PVP : Polyvinylpyrrolidone

QbD : Quality by Design

QTPP : Quality Target Product Profile

RSM : Response Surface Methodology

SR : Sustained Release

T₅₀% : Time to 50% Drug Release

XRD : X-Ray Diffraction

 

 

Declaration:

 

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

Ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this study, as the manuscript is a literature-based narrative review and involved no original research with human participants or animal subjects.

Clinical Trial No:

As this manuscript is based solely on a narrative review of previously published literature and involves no clinical trials, clinical trial registration was not applicable.

Consent for publication: Clinical trial registration was not applicable, as this manuscript is a narrative review based exclusively on previously published literature and does not involve any clinical trial.

Availability of data and material: Data availability was not applicable, as this manuscript is a narrative review based on previously published literature and does not involve the generation or analysis of original datasets.

Funding: The authors declare that no dedicated financial support was received from any governmental,

 commercial or non-profit funding organization for the preparation of this review.

Declaration of competing interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest 

regarding  the publication of this manuscript.

Acknowledgements: The authors sincerely acknowledge the Principal of Columbia Institute of Pharmacy, Columbia Professional University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India and the Principal of Gracious College of Pharmacy, Village Belbhata, Abhanpur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India, for their valuable encouragement, support and provision of the necessary infrastructure and library facilities for the successful completion of this review.

Authorship contribution statement:

Ruchi Gupta: Writing-review & editing

Niharika sahu: Visualization, schematic design, graphical abstract development and figure illustration.

Rahul Dev: Manuscript writing, review & editing and critical revision.

Rupesh sahu: Literature review, data collection and curation, validation and manuscript evaluation.

Dharmendra sahu: Concept development, methodology and critical review of the manuscript.

Shiv Kumar Bhardwaj: Writing, methodology, visualization and final manuscript editing.

 

 

 

References

  1. Chaudhary S, Kulkarni A. Metformin: Past, Present, and Future. Curr Diab Rep. 2024;24(6):119-130. doi:10.1007/s11892-024-01539-1
  2. Liu Y, Liang Y, Yuhong J, et al. Advances in Nanotechnology for Enhancing the Solubility and Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble Drugs. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024;Volume 18:1469-1495. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S447496
  3. Vlad RA, Pintea A, Pintea C, et al. Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose—A Key Excipient in Pharmaceutical Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(6):784. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17060784
  4. Duarte JG, Duarte MG, Piedade AP, Mascarenhas-Melo F. Rethinking Pharmaceutical Industry with Quality by Design: Application in Research, Development, Manufacturing, and Quality Assurance. AAPS J. 2025;27(4):96. doi:10.1208/s12248-025-01079-w
  5. Ragucci E, Uboldi M, Melocchi A, Serratoni M, Zema L. Wet Granulation as a Solidification Strategy for Converting Aqueous Nanosuspensions into Solid Dosage Forms. Pharmaceutics. 2026;18(5):543. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics18050543
  6. Abdulkarim M, Alabdulwahab AB, Issa AA, et al. AI-Assisted Simulation and Design of Sustained Release Metformin Tablets: Experimental Validation and Predictive Accuracy Assessment. J Pharm Innov. 2026;21(6):581. doi:10.1007/s12247-026-10788-4
  7. Hosseini Y, Niknejad A, Sabbagh Kashani A, et al. NLRP3 inflammasomes pathway: a key target for Metformin. Inflammopharmacology. 2025;33(4):1729-1760. doi:10.1007/s10787-025-01702-4
  8. Zhang X, Xiao F, Zou M, Piao H. Effect of octreotide-deoxycholate hydrophobic ion pairing solid dispersions on intestinal permeability to enhance octreotide absorption via increased lipophilicity and ASBT-mediated transport. Int J Pharm. 2026;696:126817. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2026.126817
  9. Rezanejad Gatabi Z, Mirhoseini M, Abasi M, Shokati Sayyad M, Ebrahimnejad P. Sustained-release sodium alginate-based metformin/bentonite nanocomposite hydrogel for enhanced wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2026;117:108035. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2026.108035
  10. Chinnaiyan SK, Veedu AT, Rathnakaran A, Veedu DK, Rayaroth MP, K V AK. QbD-based optimisation and level A IVIVC of gliclazide sustained-release matrix tablets using Pectin and HPMC. Ann Pharm Fr. 2026;84(3):465-483. doi:10.1016/j.pharma.2025.12.007
  11. Alshammari ND, Uttreja P, Elkanayati R, Jaidev Chakka LR, Vemula SK, Repka MA. Development of 3D-printed chitosan/p-coumaric acid scaffolds for wound healing: antibacterial properties and drug release kinetics. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2026;219:114953. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2025.114953
  12. Arévalo-Pérez R, Maderuelo C, Lanao JM. Development of intestinal colonic drug delivery systems for diverticular disease: A QbD approach. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024;203:106918. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106918
  13. Suksaeree J, Monton C, Maneewattanapinyo P. Quality by Design Integration of Design of Experiments for Tablet Formulation Optimization and Process Validation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2026;27(2):94. doi:10.1208/s12249-026-03335-4
  14. Sousa AS, Serra J, Estevens C, Costa R, Ribeiro AJ. Unveiling Swelling and Erosion Dynamics: Early Development Screening of Mirabegron Extended Release Tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024;25(8):277. doi:10.1208/s12249-024-02994-5
  15. Ansari MT, Alahmed TAA, Sami F. Quality by Design (QbD) Concept for Formulation of Oral Formulations for Tablets. In: Introduction to Quality by Design (QbD). Springer Nature Singapore; 2024:161-184. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8034-5_7
  16. Dhyagala S, Kumar A, Sirvi PK, Kunjir S, Rohila A, Malayandi R. Reverse Engineering of Branded Mesalamine Prolonged Release Granules for Synthesis of QTPP and FMEA: A Systematic Approach for Oral Complex Generic Product Development. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2026;27(3):108. doi:10.1208/s12249-025-03320-3
  17. Garg U, Kaul S, Verma R, Jain N, Pandey M, Nagaich U. Azithromycin-based Albumin Nanoparticles Loaded Oral Fast-dissolving Films as Superheroes in the Fight against Strep Throat. Bionanoscience. 2026;16(1):57. doi:10.1007/s12668-025-02323-5
  18. Bautista M, Caille S, Corredor C, et al. Blend Uniformity and Content Uniformity in Oral Solid Dosage Manufacturing: an IQ Consortium Industry Position Paper. AAPS J. 2025;27(2):49. doi:10.1208/s12248-025-01028-7
  19. Suksaeree J, Maneewattanapinyo P, Monton C. AI-enabled, QbD-aligned Predictive, and Sustainable Design of Natural Polymer-based Drug Delivery Systems. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2026;27(2):90. doi:10.1208/s12249-026-03326-5
  20. Nam J hyun, Kim B hyeon, Shafioul ASM, Jin M, Cho CW. A comprehensive review of oral disintegrating film products, and their quality assessment and development. J Pharm Investig. 2025;55(3):351-373. doi:10.1007/s40005-024-00714-6
  21. Mast Y, Maus M, Fromm E, Dosta M. Streamlined model-driven development of fluid bed granulation with minimal experiments. Advanced Powder Technology. 2026;37(6):105278. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2026.105278
  22. Badawy SIF, Narang AS, LaMarche KR, et al. Integrated application of quality-by-design principles to drug product and its control strategy development. In: Handbook of Pharmaceutical Wet Granulation. Elsevier; 2026:633-668. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-29817-2.00017-5
  23. Badawy SIF, Narang AS, LaMarche KR, et al. Integrated application of quality-by-design principles to drug product and its control strategy development. In: Handbook of Pharmaceutical Wet Granulation. Elsevier; 2026:633-668. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-29817-2.00017-5
  24. Chatzidopavlaki P, Triantafyllopoulou E, Pippa N, Valsami G, Dallas PP. Recent advances in the technology of effervescent tablets: lessons learned and future perspectives. RSC Pharmaceutics. 2025;2(1):8-18. doi:10.1039/D4PM00229F
  25. Pham TPD, Vu ML, Tran CS, Tran LN, Tung NT. Partially neutralized polyacrylate as a mucoadhesive polymer for gastroretentive delivery of a weakly basic drug: mechanistic study and in vivo evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2026;117:108080. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2026.108080
  26. Mukherjee K, Dutta P, Badwaik HR, Giri TK. Xanthan gum and its composite-based hydrogels. In: Polysaccharide Hydrogels for Drug Delivery and Regenerative Medicine. Elsevier; 2024:89-108. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95351-1.00017-X
  27. Akram S, Malik NS, Zeeshan M, et al. Design, development, and characterization of stimuli-responsive polymeric carriers for colon-specific drug delivery: A promising approach for capecitabine. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2025;113:107359. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107359
  28. Senarat S, Phaechamud T, Pornsawad P, Chaiya P. Effervescence-modulated drug release from HPMC matrix tablets: Mechanistic insight and numerical estimation of water and ibuprofen diffusivity. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2025;113:107285. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107285
  29. Thrivikraman S, Kamalasanan K, Umar K. P. A, K P, R. Unni A, M. S. S. Bulk and surface engineered drug delivery system of repurposed drug enhances low-dose gemcitabine efficacy in pancreatic cancer. Int J Pharm. 2025;684:126152. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126152
  30. Liu D, Hu L, Xu E, et al. CO2-responsive ethyl cellulose–microsphere films for postharvest freshness monitoring of fresh products. Food Control. 2026;184:112025. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2026.112025
  31. Sandu MKR, Majumdar S, Chatterjee S, Mazumder R. Optimization and characterization of xanthan gum based multiparticulate formulation for colon targeting. Intelligent Pharmacy. 2024;2(3):339-345. doi:10.1016/j.ipha.2024.02.007
  32. Gong J, Zhang E, Wang Y. Development and characterization of hydroxypropyl guar gum-modified acrylate grouting material for leakage control under flowing conditions. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2025;23:e05353. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05353
  33. Venturini J, Chakraborty A, Baysal MA, Tsimberidou AM. Developments in nanotechnology approaches for the treatment of solid tumors. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025;14(1):76. doi:10.1186/s40164-025-00656-1
  34. Abdullah S, Thiab S, A. Al-Masud A, Marzoog Al-Sharafa M, Ardakani A. Carrageenan Matrix for Sustained Levofloxacin Delivery: Formulation Strategies and Dual Evaluation Approaches. J Pharm Innov. 2025;20(4):142. doi:10.1007/s12247-025-10043-2
  35. Na MS, Lee YS, Ha ES, Kim MS, Park H. Comprehensive review in continuous direct compression process. J Pharm Investig. 2025;55(3):415-462. doi:10.1007/s40005-025-00727-9
  36. Li J, Vyas Z, Weiler C, Tseng YC, Paul S. Novel powder property-based indices for predicting segregation risk in multicomponent pharmaceutical blends. Int J Pharm. 2025;682:125990. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125990
  37. Ranjan OP, Kumbhar AP. Dry and wet granulation. In: Polymers for Oral Drug Delivery Technologies. Elsevier; 2025:463-494. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-13774-7.00010-4
  38. dos Santos ECF, Machado JCB, Ferreira MRA, Soares LAL. Strategies to Overcome Challenges in Formulating Tablets from Dried Plant Extracts: a Comprehensive Review. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025;27(1):14. doi:10.1208/s12249-025-03255-9
  39. Al-hashimi N, Dahmash EZ, Khoder M, Alany R, Elshaer A. Engineering pH-Dependent Orally Disintegrating Tablets for Modified Indomethacin Release: A Polymer-Based Approach. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025;26(4):93. doi:10.1208/s12249-025-03082-y
  40. Yingngam B. Design of Experiments (DoE) in Manufacturing Process Optimization. In: Sustainable Pharmaceutical Product Development and Optimization Processes. Springer Nature Singapore; 2025:107-139. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9707-3_5
  41. Tomuta I, Porfire A, Iurian S, Casian T. Optimization techniques in pharmaceutical formulation and processing. In: Dosage Forms, Formulation Developments and Regulations. Elsevier; 2024:257-284. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-91817-6.00014-0
  42. Narukulla S, Bogadi S, Tallapaneni V, et al. Comparative study between the Full Factorial, Box–Behnken, and Central Composite Designs in the optimization of metronidazole immediate release tablet. Microchemical Journal. 2024;207:111875. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2024.111875
  43. Dular Vovko A, Hodžić B, Brec T, Hudovornik G, Vrečer F. Influence of Formulation Factors, Process Parameters, and Selected Quality Attributes on Carvedilol Release from Roller-Compacted Hypromellose-Based Matrix Tablets. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(4):876. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14040876
  44. Iro UI, Alaneme GU, Ganasen N, et al. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of bagasse ash concrete using response surface methodology. Discover Sustainability. 2025;6(1):309. doi:10.1007/s43621-025-01192-y
  45. Du H, Lu H, Tang J, Liu H. Characterization of powder flow properties from micron to nanoscale using FT4 powder rheometer and PT-X powder tester. Particuology. 2023;75:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2022.05.014
  46. Dursun SK, Taşova M, Öcalan ON. Effects of kiwi powder produced by hybrid microwave drying method on drying kinetics, energy parameter, thermal, physicochemical and bioactive properties. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2025;169:109664. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109664
  47. Tharanon W, Guo Y, Peerapattana J, Sun CC. A systematic comparison of four pharmacopoeial methods for measuring powder flowability. Int J Pharm. 2024;661:124454. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124454
  48. Lin L, Lin X, Shen L, Hong Y, Zhao L. Study on powder physical and compression properties of mannitol: Similarity, variation, and classification. Powder Technol. 2026;474:122256. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2026.122256
  49. Kalman H, Portnikov D. Underwater measurements of flowability by angle of repose, Hausner ratio and Jenike shear cell. Powder Technol. 2023;429:118883. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118883
  50. Faisal M, Bevilacqua M, Bro R, et al. Colorimetric pH indicators based on well-defined amylose and amylopectin matrices enriched with anthocyanins from red cabbage. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;250:126250. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126250
  51. Ahmed B, Raval V, McGowan M, et al. Particle engineering of a needle-like active pharmaceutical ingredient into size controlled agglomerates: Part I. Process scalability and development. Int J Pharm. 2025;686:126363. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126363
  52. Rajput TA, Jadhav P, Bhujbal S, Shaharwale V, Ghuge P. Pharmaceutical quality enhancement: Robotics and automation’s role in advancing Good Manufacturing Practices. Intelligent Hospital. 2026;2(3):100087. doi:10.1016/j.inhs.2026.100087
  53. Johannesson J, Wu M, Johansson M, Bergström CAS. Quality attributes for printable emulsion gels and 3D-printed tablets: Towards production of personalized dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2023;646:123413. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123413
  54. Bahman M, Zini J, Lahtinen J, et al. Assessment of a Semi-solid Extrusion Based Compounding System Solution for Personalized Ondansetron Dosage Forms Combined with Raman Spectroscopy Analysis. Pharm Res. 2025;42(9):1631-1645. doi:10.1007/s11095-025-03911-6
  55. Mote V, Kokate P, Mohan K. M. G, Patel P, Jain K. Global quality control testing and regulatory standards for tablet dosage forms. In: Advances in Tablet Manufacturing Technologies. Elsevier; 2026:181-195. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-36751-9.00004-8
  56. Chachlioutaki K, Ritzoulis C, Fatouros DG, Karavasili C. Personalized compounded medications for companion animals. Int J Pharm. 2025;683:126107. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126107
  57. Gan KZ, Widodo RT, Chik Z, Nordin ML, Bin LK. Enhancement and evaluation of vardenafil hydrochloride trihydrate absorption in orodispersible tablet formulations: Establishment of in vitro, in vivo correlation and bioequivalence study. Chem Biol Interact. 2025;421:111745. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111745
  58. Sudhirkumar MN, Patel RK. AQbD-Optimized Green Stability-indicating RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Evogliptin Tartrate and Metformin HCl. J Pharm Innov. 2026;21(1):8. doi:10.1007/s12247-025-10146-w
  59. Kim MJ, Tang C, Park SY, Liu KH, Lee K, Kim DW. 3D-printed ethylcellulose matrix for gastroretentive delivery: Fabrication and characterization of sustained-release metformin hydrochloride tablets. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026;379:153898. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.153898
  60. Rojek B, Gazda M, Plenis A. FTIR, Raman spectroscopy and HT-XRD in compatibility study between naproxen and excipients. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2023;302:123048. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2023.123048
  61. Albu P. Thermal analysis in pharmaceutical sciences: a critical narrative review with focus on drug–excipient interactions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2026;151(18):15071-15102. doi:10.1007/s10973-026-16067-1
  62. Uzun İ. Methods of determining the degree of crystallinity of polymers with X-ray diffraction: a review. Journal of Polymer Research. 2023;30(10):394. doi:10.1007/s10965-023-03744-0
  63. Ranasinghe RASN, Senanayake SA, Wijesekara WLI, Perera PRD, Pathmalal MM, Marapana RAUJ. Characterization of biodegradable films prepared from gelatin extracted from jellyfish Acromitus flagellates using hot water extraction and microwave-assisted extraction. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2024;44:101315. doi:10.1016/j.fpsl.2024.101315
  64. Welegebrial BG, Gezae Z, Gebrekidan SK, et al. In vitro comparative quality evaluation of different brands of metformin hydrochloride tablets available in Mekelle City, Tigray Regional State, Ethiopia. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2026;27(1):66. doi:10.1186/s40360-026-01123-1
  65. Mekasha YT, Wondie Mekonen A, Nigussie S, Usure RE, Feleke MG. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles for different brands of albendazole boluses. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024;25(1):48. doi:10.1186/s40360-024-00774-2
  66. Zhang P, Zhongnan Bi, Hongyao Yu, Wang R, Guangbao Sun, Shaoming Zhang. Effect of particle surface roughness on the flowability and spreadability of Haynes 230 powder during laser powder bed fusion process. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023;26:4444-4454. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.173
  67. Torrens Sotomayor LF, Figueroa CV. Understanding the impact of intrinsic and added moisture on the granulation behavior of starch-based powders. Powder Technol. 2026;480:122632. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2026.122632
  68. Chilbule Y, Karanwad T, Banerjee S. Granulation-driven modulation of improved advanced flow properties with immediate drug release using modified Eudragit EPO granules. J Microencapsul. 2026;43(1):53-73. doi:10.1080/02652048.2026.2669799
  69. Wang Z, Wan X, Luo X, et al. Development of a data fusion strategy combining FT-NIR and Vis/NIR-HSI for non-destructive prediction of critical quality attributes in traditional Chinese medicine particles. Vib Spectrosc. 2025;137:103780. doi:10.1016/j.vibspec.2025.103780
  70. Budiman A, Lailasari E, Nurani NV, et al. Ternary Solid Dispersions: A Review of the Preparation, Characterization, Mechanism of Drug Release, and Physical Stability. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(8):2116. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15082116
  71. Lee J, Goodwin DJ, Dhenge RM, Nassar J, Zeitler JA. Calorimetric investigation on heat release during the disintegration process of pharmaceutical tablets. Int J Pharm. 2024;660:124315. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124315
  72. Prasad C, Park SY, Lee JS, et al. Modeling and investigation of swelling kinetics of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/starch/citric acid superabsorbent polymer. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253:127013. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127013
  73. Hussnain SM, Shah SZH, Megat-Yusoff PSM, Hussain MZ. Degradation and mechanical performance of fibre-reinforced polymer composites under marine environments: A review of recent advancements. Polym Degrad Stab. 2023;215:110452. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2023.110452
  74. Bagde S, Rohera BD. Modification of the swelling behavior of a hydrophilic polymer as an approach to maintaining a constant gel layer thickness. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2024;92:105294. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105294
  75. Dave PN, Macwan PM, Kamaliya B. Drug release and thermal properties of magnetic cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanocomposite hydrogels based on poly(acrylic acid-g-N-isopropyl acrylamide) grafted onto gum ghatti. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;224:358-369. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.129
  76. Mir A, Kumar A, Riaz U. Synthesis and characterization of conducting polymer/alginate composite hydrogels: Effect of conducting polymer loading on the release behaviour of metformin drug. J Mol Liq. 2023;372:121193. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2022.121193
  77. Viswanadha LS, Arcot Y, Lin YT, Akbulut MES. A comparative investigation of release kinetics of paclitaxel from natural protein and macromolecular nanocarriers in nanoscale drug delivery systems. JCIS Open. 2024;15:100120. doi:10.1016/j.jciso.2024.100120
  78. Erawati E, Hamid H, Musthofa M, et al. Drug release kinetics of capsule shells from seaweed carrageenan extract (Eucheuma cottonii) and potato starch as a gelling agent. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2023;47(1):69. doi:10.1186/s42269-023-01045-6
  79. Talevi A, Ruiz ME. Drug Release. In: ADME Processes in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024:13-23. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50419-8_2
  80. Mohsin MEA, Siddiqa AJ, Mousa S, Shrivastava NK. Design, Characterization, and Release Kinetics of a Hybrid Hydrogel Drug Delivery System for Sustained Hormone Therapy. Polymers (Basel). 2025;17(8):999. doi:10.3390/polym17080999
  81. Akın Şahbaz D. Gelatin-based hydrogels and ferrogels as smart drug delivery systems: synthesis, characterization and drug release kinetics. Polymer Bulletin. 2024;81(6):5215-5235. doi:10.1007/s00289-023-04963-7
  82. Panysheva O. Pharmaceutical development of composition of effervescent tablets with acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, and ascorbic acid. Pharmaceutical Science Advances. 2026;4:100123. doi:10.1016/j.pscia.2026.100123
  83. dos Santos MS, do Nascimento DD, Medeiros JJS, Lourenço FR, de Oliveira CA, Prado LD. Analytical quality by design and measurement uncertainty in the development of discriminative dissolution method for pediatric fixed-dose combination dispersible tablets of isoniazid and rifampicin. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2025;265:116994. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2025.116994
  84. Kapadia R, Shevalkar G, Das U, Singhai V, Bari D, Pardeshi C V. Introduction to Quality by Design. In: Introduction to Quality by Design (QbD). Springer Nature Singapore; 2024:1-33. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8034-5_1
  85. Shahiwala A. AI approaches for the development of drug delivery systems. In: A Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Delivery. Elsevier; 2023:83-96. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-89925-3.00004-6
  86. Patel RA, Kesharwani SS, Ibrahim F. Active learning and Gaussian processes for the development of dissolution models: An AI-based data-efficient approach. Journal of Controlled Release. 2025;379:316-326. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.003
  87. Wu D, Li M. Current State and Challenges of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) in Oral Drug Product Development. Pharm Res. 2023;40(2):321-336. doi:10.1007/s11095-022-03373-0
  88. Movilla-Meza NA, Patel DS, Méndez R, Romañach RJ. PAT for monitoring the state of control in continuous manufacturing of solid oral dosage forms. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025;417(25):5597-5609. doi:10.1007/s00216-025-06012-w
  89. Li J, Tracy T, O’Connor T, Lee S, Li X. Continuous manufacturing: modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing with advanced technologies and 3D printing. In: Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms. Elsevier; 2026:1385-1411. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-34156-4.00016-9