Available online on 15.07.2026 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2026 The   Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access Full Text Article  Review Article

The Neuro-Immune Axis in Ayurveda: An Integrative Analysis of the Vata–Manas–Ojas Triad and Modern Psychoneuroimmunology

Dr. Falguni Joshi ¹*, Prof. Udai Raj Saroj ², Prof HML Meena ³

¹ Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

² Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

³ HOD and Prof, Department of Kayachikitsa, National Institute of Ayurveda, De-Novo, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

 

 

1. Introduction

The relationship among psychological stress, neural regulation, and immune function has been a cornerstone of modern psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) since Selye's seminal 1936 stress research.¹ In parallel, the classical Ayurvedic tradition—systematized over two millennia ago—articulated a sophisticated mind–body–immunity framework through the interplay of Vata, Mansa, and Ojas. Despite striking conceptual parallels, a significant lacuna persists in the scholarly literature: no robust integrative model bridges these two paradigms.

Contemporary PNI research has identified the HPA axis, sympathetic nervous system, and cytokine networks as the mechanistic substrates of stress-immune crosstalk.²⁻⁴ By contrast, ancient Ayurvedic texts describe the regulatory triad of Vata (neural principle), Manas (mind), and Ojas (immune essence) as governing the continuum between health and disease. The absence of a rigorous conceptual model that unifies these traditions limits translational research and cross-disciplinary clinical innovation.

This paper addresses that gap. It proceeds in four steps: (1) reviewing the modern PNI framework, with an emphasis on HPA axis and sympathetic nervous system regulation of immunity; (2) systematically analyzing the Ayurvedic constructs of Vata, Manas, and Ojas in light of their functional roles; (3) constructing an integrative model of functional homology between the two systems; and (4) deriving clinical and research implications for translational medicine.

2.1 Objective(s)

To examine the convergence between Ayurvedic concepts of neuro-immune regulation and contemporary psychoneuroimmunology (PNI), and to develop an integrative framework linking the Ayurvedic triad of Vata, Manas, and Ojas with modern neuroendocrine and immunological mechanisms involved in stress responses and immune regulation.

2.2 Methods   

Data Sources

Classical Ayurvedic literature, primarily the Charaka Samhita, along with seminal and contemporary scientific literature on psychoneuroimmunology, stress physiology, neuroendocrinology, and immune regulation. Sources included foundational works by Hans Selye, McEwen, Chrousos, Ader, Sapolsky, Dhabhar, and related peer-reviewed publications.

Study Selection

Relevant classical Ayurvedic concepts pertaining to Vata, Manas, Ojas, Chittodvega, and Rasayana were selected and compared with contemporary evidence regarding the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, sympathetic nervous system activation, cytokine regulation, allostatic load, and neuroimmune interactions. Literature was selected based on its relevance to stress-mediated immune modulation and integrative medicine.

3. The Modern Neuro-Immune Axis

The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is the primary neuroendocrine pathway through which psychological stress modulates immune function. When a stressor is perceived, corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) initiates a cascade that culminates in cortisol secretion, which exerts both immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects depending on the chronicity and dosage of exposure.²

Simultaneously, the sympathetic nervous system releases catecholamines—norepinephrine and epinephrine—that directly innervate lymphoid organs, thereby altering lymphocyte trafficking and cytokine profiles. Chronic activation shifts the immune state toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype, elevating interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), while concurrently suppressing adaptive immunity.⁶⁻⁷ This dual-arm model—encompassing both HPA axis and sympathetic nervous system engagement—constitutes the biomedical foundation against which Ayurvedic constructs can be meaningfully evaluated.

3.1   The HPA Cascade

The HPA axis activation sequence proceeds as follows: stress perception → hypothalamic CRH release → anterior pituitary ACTH secretion → adrenal cortex cortisol production → systemic immunomodulation. McEwen has described this cascade in terms of allostatic load, in which adaptive short-term stress responses become maladaptive with chronicity.³ Sapolsky and colleagues extended this framework to demonstrate the permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions of glucocorticoids on immune function.⁶

3.2 Chronic Stress and Immune Dysregulation

Dhabhar has highlighted the distinction between acute stress-induced immunoenhancement and chronic stress-induced immunosuppression, arguing that the duration and predictability of stress exposure are critical determinants of immune outcomes.⁷ Chronic psychological stress has been specifically linked to elevated inflammatory markers, impaired vaccine responses, delayed wound healing, and increased susceptibility to viral infections. These observations provide the empirical backdrop for understanding Ayurvedic descriptions of stress-mediated disease susceptibility.

4. The Ayurvedic Framework: Vata, Manas, and Ojas

4.1 Vata as the Neuro-Regulatory Principle

In classical Ayurveda, Vata Dosha is not merely a constitutional type but a fundamental bio-regulatory force that governs all neural and kinetic phenomena in the living organism. The Charaka Samhita (Sutrasthana 12/8) declares Vata to be the "Niyanta Praneta ca Manasah"—the controller and director of the mind and sensory–motor faculties.¹ This designation positions Vata as a principle functionally analogous to the central and autonomic nervous systems in modern physiology.

The key functional domains of Vata encompass: (1) neural conduction—transmission of sensory and motor impulses; (2) cognitive regulation—control of Manas and the sense organs (Indriyas); (3) physiological motion—governance of respiration, circulation, and peristalsis; and (4) homeostatic balance—maintenance of equilibrium among the three Doshas and the seven Dhatus. Vata's role as both the generator and regulator of systemic activity makes it the Ayurvedic equivalent of the integrated central and autonomic nervous system described in modern physiology.

4.2 Ojas and Immune Competence

In classical Ayurvedic literature, Ojas is described as the Sara (essence) of all Sapta Dhatus (seven bodily tissues), representing the ultimate biochemical product of healthy digestion and metabolism. It is the material substrate of Bala—a term encompassing physical strength, disease resistance, and what modern biomedicine recognizes as immune competence.¹

Ojas is the final, most refined product of sequential tissue metabolism—from Rasa (plasma) through Shukra (reproductive tissue). Its formation depends on optimal Agni (digestive fire) at each metabolic stage. Classical texts place Ojas in the Hridaya (heart) and describe it as pervading the entire body. Its quantity and quality directly determine disease resistance and vitality.

When depleted—a state termed Ojas Kshaya—the individual exhibits Bhaya (fear), Daurbalya (weakness), anxiety, and increased susceptibility to disease. These symptoms closely parallel the clinical presentation of chronic stress-induced immunosuppression described in the PNI literature.⁵ Ojas thus functionally correlates with immunological competence, encompassing innate immunity, adaptive immune memory, and psychosomatic well-being as an integrated construct.

4.3 Manas: The Mind–Body Interface

In Ayurvedic thought, Manas occupies the interface between pure consciousness (Atman/Purusha) and material physiology. It receives, processes, and responds to sensory information, and its quality is governed by the three Gunas—Satva (clarity), Rajas (activity), and Tamas (inertia). Manas is intrinsically linked to Vata, which governs its movement, and to Ojas, whose depletion directly impairs mental stability and immune resilience. This triadic interdependence—Vata, Manas, and Ojas—constitutes the Ayurvedic model of mind–neuro–immune regulation.

5. Chittodvega: The Ayurvedic Stress Pathology Framework

The Ayurvedic concept of Chittodvega—literally "agitation of the mind"—describes a pathological state arising from the dual etiology of Vata Prakopa (aggravation of Vata Dosha) and Rajas (the psychic quality of hyperactivity, passion, and restlessness). This pathological sequence closely mirrors what modern psychiatry and PNI classify as chronic stress-related disorders.

The pathophysiological cascade of Chittodvega proceeds through four stages: (1) Rajasic mental disturbance—excessive desire, anxiety, and emotional turbulence provoke mental disequilibrium; (2) Vata Prakopa—Rajas destabilizes Vata, producing symptoms of insomnia (Anidra), anxiety (Chinta), tremors, and autonomic dysregulation; (3) systemic Doshic imbalance—aggravated Vata disrupts Pitta and Kapha, leading to widespread physiological derangement; and (4) neuroendocrine cascade—the imbalance triggers downstream effects analogous to HPA axis hyperactivation, including cortisol dysregulation, immune suppression, and progressive Ojas depletion.

The clinical symptom profile of Chittodvega—encompassing anxiety, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and susceptibility to infection—maps closely onto the biomedical phenotype of chronic psychological stress with neuro-immune sequelae. This correspondence is not merely metaphorical; it suggests that both systems describe the same underlying psychophysiological process in different conceptual languages.

6. An Integrative Conceptual Model

The central contribution of this analysis is the construction of a unified conceptual model that maps the Ayurvedic stress–immunity pathway onto the modern PNI framework. This model posits that psychological stress operates through a conserved cascade, whether described in the language of Vata–Manas–Ojas or of CRH–Cortisol–Cytokines: the functional architecture is strikingly convergent.

Table 1 presents the systematic alignment of Ayurvedic and biomedical constructs:

 

 

Table 1. Functional Homology between Ayurvedic and Biomedical Constructs in Neuro-Immune Regulation

Ayurvedic Construct           Biomedical Correlate                    Functional Role

Vata Dosha             Central & Autonomic Nervous System      Neural regulation, signal transmission, physiological motion

Manas                        Limbic-cortical stress processing,             Cognitive-emotional appraisal, stress perception

Ojas                        Innate & Adaptive Immune Competence     Disease resistance, immune memory, psychosomatic vitality

Chittodvega          Chronic Psychological Stress                Pathological mind-body cascade leading to immune dysregulation

Vata Prakopa             HPA axis & SNS hyperactivation              Neuroendocrine dysregulation, autonomic imbalance

Ojas Kshaya               Immunosuppression / Allostatic overload     Depleted immune reserves, susceptibility to infection

Rasayana therapy      Neuroimmune rehabilitation                    Restoration of immune competence and neural homeostasis

 

 

This integrative model does not claim equivalence between the two paradigms but rather posits functional homology: both systems describe a sequence in which mental perturbation destabilizes neural regulation, which in turn depletes the body's immune defenses. The model provides a scaffold for hypothesis-driven translational research, enabling investigators to design studies that simultaneously measure Ayurvedic outcome parameters and biomedical immune markers.

 

 

 

7. Clinical and Research Implications

7.1 Stress-Related Inflammatory Disorders

Ayurvedic Vata-pacifying protocols (Vata Shamana) may complement standard anti-inflammatory therapies for conditions such as chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and fibromyalgia, in which HPA axis dysregulation is well documented. The theoretical basis is the observed correspondence between Vata aggravation and sympathetic nervous system hyperactivation—both characterized by heightened reactivity, autonomic instability, and a systemic pro-inflammatory shift.

7.2 Autoimmune Conditions

The Ojas depletion model offers a theoretical basis for investigating Rasayana (rejuvenation) therapies as adjuncts in autoimmune management, particularly for diseases in which psychological stress is a recognized trigger—including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Rasayana formulations such as Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) and Guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia) have shown immunomodulatory effects in preliminary clinical studies, warranting rigorous controlled evaluation.

7.3 Geriatric Neuro-Immune Decline

Age-related immunosenescence parallels the Ayurvedic concept of progressive Ojas diminution. Integrative geriatric protocols that combine Medhya Rasayanas (nootropic and neuroprotective formulations) with modern neuroimmune biomarkers provide fertile ground for clinical trials. Such trials could assess outcomes including cognitive function, NK cell activity, diurnal cortisol variation, and traditional Bala Pariksha (assessment of strength and vitality).

7.4 Scope for Integrative Translational Trials

Randomized controlled trials measuring cortisol, IL-6, TNF-α, and NK cell activity alongside Ayurvedic outcome parameters—including Bala Pariksha and Ojas Lakshanas (observable signs of Ojas quality)—could yield compelling translational evidence. Such designs require collaboration among Ayurvedic clinicians, immunologists, and PNI researchers, and their feasibility is enhanced by the conceptual framework developed here.

8. Results

The comparative analysis revealed substantial functional convergence between Ayurvedic concepts and contemporary psychoneuroimmunological mechanisms. The Ayurvedic triad of Vata, Manas, and Ojas closely corresponded to the modern neuro–immune axis comprising neural regulation, psychological processing, and immune competence.

Vata was identified as functionally analogous to the central and autonomic nervous systems, regulating communication, movement, and physiological coordination. Manas corresponded to cognitive and emotional processing systems involved in stress perception and behavioral responses. Ojas exhibited similarities to immune competence, resilience, and the maintenance of systemic homeostasis.

The Ayurvedic concept of Chittodvega (mental agitation) shows notable parallels with chronic psychological stress. Both frameworks describe a sequence in which mental disturbance initiates neuroregulatory dysfunction, leading to physiological imbalance and reduced immune resilience. In modern terms, this process is mediated by activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system, resulting in altered cortisol secretion, cytokine dysregulation, and immune dysfunction.

The analysis further demonstrated that Vata Prakopa may be interpreted as a state functionally comparable to chronic neuroendocrine activation and autonomic dysregulation, whereas Ojas Kshaya shares characteristics with immunosuppression, allostatic overload, and increased susceptibility to disease. Similarly, Rasayana therapy exhibited conceptual overlap with neuroimmune restorative strategies aimed at improving resilience, reducing inflammation, and enhancing overall health.

An integrative model was developed to link psychological stress, Vata–Manas imbalance, neuroendocrine activation, immune dysregulation, and Ojas depletion. This model offers a theoretical framework for understanding stress-related inflammatory disorders, autoimmune conditions, and age-associated neuroimmune decline from both Ayurvedic and biomedical perspectives.

Overall, the findings suggest that Ayurveda and psychoneuroimmunology describe comparable functional pathways for mind–body–immune interaction, albeit in different conceptual languages, supporting the feasibility of future translational and interdisciplinary research.

9. Discussion

The present analysis reveals a degree of conceptual convergence between Ayurvedic and modern biomedical models of neuro-immune regulation that extends beyond superficial analogy. The Vata–Manas–Ojas triad encodes a systems-level understanding of mind–body–immunity interaction that is functionally coherent when mapped onto the HPA axis and sympathetic nervous system architecture of contemporary PNI.

This convergence does not imply that ancient Ayurvedic physicians possessed knowledge of molecular immunology. Rather, it suggests that careful clinical observation over centuries yielded functional insights that are now being validated by mechanistic research. The Ayurvedic tradition's emphasis on the primacy of mental equilibrium in maintaining physical health—expressed through concepts like Sattva Bala (mental strength) and Satmya (wholesome adaptation)—anticipates the PNI finding that psychological resilience buffers against stress-mediated immunosuppression.

Limitations of the present analysis include its primarily theoretical nature and the lack of original empirical data. The proposed functional homologies require validation through prospective experimental and clinical research. Furthermore, Ayurvedic constructs such as Ojas and Vata resist simple reduction to single biomedical equivalents; they likely map onto multiple overlapping biological systems. Future research should embrace this complexity rather than seek one-to-one equivalencies.

 

10. Summary of Contents

The review identified substantial functional parallels between Ayurvedic and modern neuroimmunological frameworks. Vata was found to correspond to neural regulation and autonomic processes, Manas to cognitive-emotional and stress-processing mechanisms, and Ojas to immune competence and systemic resilience. The Ayurvedic concept of Chittodvega showed significant similarity to chronic psychological stress and its downstream neuroendocrine consequences, including HPA axis dysregulation and immune dysfunction. An integrative conceptual model was developed to illustrate functional homologies between Ayurvedic constructs and modern psychoneuroimmunological pathways. Potential implications were identified for stress-related inflammatory disorders, autoimmune diseases, and age-associated neuroimmune decline.

11. Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates that the classical Ayurvedic tradition articulated a sophisticated understanding of the neuro-immune axis centuries before the formal emergence of psychoneuroimmunology. The Vata–Manas–Ojas triad constitutes a conceptual framework that functionally parallels—and in some respects enriches—the modern HPA axis model of stress-mediated immunomodulation.

The path forward lies not in asserting equivalence between ancient and modern systems, but in recognizing that functional homologies between Ayurvedic and biomedical constructs can generate novel hypotheses and therapeutic strategies for stress-mediated immune disorders. Integrative models of this kind—grounded in rigorous conceptual analysis and amenable to empirical testing—represent one of the most productive frontiers for twenty-first century medicine.

Acknowledgements: The authors express their sincere gratitude to all scholars, teachers, and researchers whose contributions to Ayurveda, psychoneuroimmunology, and integrative medicine have provided the intellectual foundation for this work. The authors also acknowledge the classical Ayurvedic texts and contemporary scientific literature that informed the development of this conceptual analysis. 

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

References

1.     Agnivesha, Charaka, Dridhabala. Charaka Samhita. Chakrapanidatta commentary, Ayurveda Dipika. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan; 2014.

2. Selye H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature. 1936;138:32. https://doi.org/10.1038/138032a0

3. McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(3):171-179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380307 PMid:9428819

4. Chrousos GP. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5(7):374-381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2009.106 PMid:19488073

5. Ader R, Felten DL, Cohen N. Psychoneuroimmunology. 4^th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000258380.48362.c9

6. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(1):55-89. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389 PMid:10696570

7. Dhabhar FS. Enhancing versus suppressive effects of stress on immune function: implications for immunoprotection and immunopathology. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2009;16(5):300-317. https://doi.org/10.1159/000216188 PMid:19571591 PMCid:PMC2790771

8.     Lad V. Textbook of Ayurveda: Fundamental Principles. Albuquerque (NM): Ayurvedic Press; 2002.

9. Raison CL, Capuron L, Miller AH. Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the pathogenesis of depression. Trends Immunol. 2006;27(1):24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2005.11.006 PMid:16316783 PMCid:PMC3392963

10. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, McGuire L, Robles TF, Glaser R. Emotions, morbidity, and mortality: new perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:83-107 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135217 PMid:11752480