Available online on 15.07.2026 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Review Article
Therapeutic Advancement in Cardiovascular Disorders: Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Targets and Translational Perspectives
Shibani Jena 1, Shailaja Lenka 1, Chetna Patra 1, Sanjay Kumar Raul *1,
1 Department of Biotechnology, Rama Devi Women’s University, Bhoinagar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751022
|
Article Info: _______________________________________________ Article History: Received 10 April 2026 Reviewed 28 May 2026 Accepted 20 June 2026 Published 15 July 2026 _______________________________________________ Cite this article as: Jena S, Lenka S, Patra C, Raul SK, Therapeutic Advancement in Cardiovascular Disorders: Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Targets and Translational Perspectives, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2026; 16(7):170-181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i7.7825 _______________________________________________ For Correspondence: Sanjay Kumar Raul, Department of Biotechnology Rama Devi Women’s University, Bhoinagar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751022. |
Abstract _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Cardiovascular disorders (CVD) have been addressed as the leading cause of global mortality and morbidity which majorly includes atherosclerosis, hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies. Its pathogenesis involves various interconnected molecular mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, mitochondrial impairment, lipid dysregulation, fibrosis and genetic alterations. The conventional pharmacological strategy of CVD includes statins, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers and antiplatelet agents. Clinically, though these medications have provided substantial improved outcomes but its long-term usage has been frequently associated with drug resistance, hepatotoxicity, myopathy, renal dysfunction, bleeding risk and residual cardiovascular events. Moreover, these primarily target symptomatic and hemodynamic abnormalities rather than the underlying molecular pathology. Recent advances in molecular cardiology and translational medicine have facilitated the development of targeted therapeutic strategies that primarily aims to overcome these limitations. Specifically, targeting dysregulated lipid pathophysiology, stains utilization has evolved to PCSK9 inhibitors and small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapeutics, such as inclisiran. Precision medication strategy has made the use of RNA therapeutics and CRISPR-Cas9-mediated which enable precise regulation of disease-associated genes. Regenerative stem cell therapies, on the other hand promoted myocardial repair and angiogenesis, while nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems improved therapeutic specificity and bioavailability. In parallel to this, AI-assisted precision cardiology has enabled early diagnosis, risk stratification, and individualized treatment planning strategies. However, despite these advances, challenges related to safety, delivery efficacy, ethical concerns and expense remain the major barriers to widespread clinical translation of these therapeutic advancements in cardiac patients. Keywords: Cardiovascular disorders, Conventional cardiac-therapeutics, PCSK9 inhibitors, RNA-based therapeutics, Gene editing, Stem cell therapy, Nanotechnology, Precision cardiology. |
Cardiac disorders are one of the widespread non-communicable diseases with increasing global mortality. According to World Health Organization (WHO) reports, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) account for approximately 17.9 million deaths globally every year1. Majorly, unhealthy dietary habits, lack of physical activities, smoking, diabetes mellitus, obesity and associated metabolic syndrome have been found to cause this global rise in cardiovascular diseases and continues to increase steadily over time. It not only affects the mortality, but also reduces the quality and duration of life along with increasing the burden at social-economic level, particularly in low as well as in middle income countries2.
CVDs are generally seen to affect the heart as well as the blood vessels system but they involve a wide range of disorders such as atherosclerosis, heart failure, peripheral arterial and coronary artery disease, rheumatic heart disease, congenital heart disease, cerebrovascular diseases, heart failure and cardiomyopathies depending on the type of multi-factorial complication involved. However, globally the major causes of death, related to CVD are ischemic heart disease and stroke. Additionally, the increased incidence of hypertension and metabolic-associated diseases has significantly contributed to the rise of atrial fibrillation, heart failure and vascular complications which further worsen the clinical outcomes3. Current therapeutic strategy related to cardiovascular diagnosis and treatment have made significant improvement over the past decades. Statins, beta-blockers, antihypertensive agents, anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs are the major examples of traditional pharmaceutical treatments, have reduced the mortality rate and improved the quality of life in patients. Besides pharmacological aspects, clinical management involves utilization of interventional techniques such as coronary angioplasty, stent implantation, cardiac ablation, and bypass grafting from serious and complicated patients. However, despite having all the clinical care and pharmacology developments, CVD continues to have higher morbidity, mortality rate and recurrent hospitalizations. The limitation scenario of conventional strategies includes drug resistance, poor patient compliance, and associated long term medications complications. Additionally, their generalized approach further limits the efficacy across varied patient populations. Thus, the need for advanced and effective therapeutics shifted the focus from merely seeing symptoms towards development of mechanism-based and precision-targeted medications. This urge has led to the emergence of molecular cardiology, regenerative medicine, genomics and biomedical engineering for improving the understanding of CVDs progression and identifies potential treatment targets. Further advancements led the development of PCK9 inhibitors, RNA therapeutics, antisense oligonucleotides, CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, stem cell therapy, tissue engineering and nanotechnology-based drug delivery system, which not only aimed to cure but to treat and restore the entire system4,5. Apart from these, artificial intelligence (AI), digital health and clinical health technologies are changing cardiovascular medicine through early detection, predictive analytics, remote monitoring, and individualized therapy planning6. Although these new solutions represent significant advancements in cardiovascular therapeutics, substantial translational obstacles remain, including safety issues, delivery restrictions, high treatment costs, ethical considerations, and insufficient long-term clinical validations. Therefore, rigorous clinical research is necessary for developing fully translated anti-CVD therapeutic which would be safer, more effective and patient-specific. This review addresses current breakthroughs in therapeutic techniques for cardiovascular illnesses, focusing on novel molecular targets, translational approaches, and future possibilities in precision cardiovascular medicine.
A detailed literature search was carried out for evaluating the evolutionary landscape of CVD therapeutics in different peer-reviewed databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, NIH, WHO etc. using words related to CVDs types, pathophysiology, and clinical management strategy including both conventional and advanced prospective.
CVDs are a combination of conditions that affect the heart and circulatory system. Depending on the underlying cause and patients response parameters, each condition shows unique clinical manifestations, such as chest pain (angina), chest pressure, heaviness or discomfort, shortness of breath (dyspnea), excessive sweating, dizziness, fatigue/exhaustion etc. However, apart from these phenotypic symptoms, their progression has been seen to largely driven by interconnected molecular and cellular mechanism involving fibrosis, lipid dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, neurohormonal activation, oxidative stress mitochondrial impairment, and genetic abnormalities as detailed in table 1. Collectively, these disorders share overlapping molecular pathways that contribute to cardiovascular dysfunction and disease progression3
Table 1. Major types of cardiovascular disorders and their molecular pathophysiology
|
Cardiovascular disorder |
Major pathophysiological features |
Important genes |
Key proteins/ biomarkers |
Major molecular pathways |
Ref |
|
Atherosclerosis |
Endothelial dysfunction, LDL oxidation, foam cell formation, vascular inflammation, plaque instability |
ABCA-1, ACE, ADAMTS7, ANRIL, APOA-1, APOB, APOE, CD36, CD40, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CETP, CXCL12, ICAM-1, IL1B, IL6, LDLR, LPA, LPL, LOX1 (OLR1), MMP9, NLRP3, NOS3, NPC1L1, PCSK9, PHACTR-1, PLA2G7, SCARB1, SMAD3, SORT1, TCF21, TGFBR2, TLR4, TNF, VCAM-1, VEGFA |
Ox-LDL, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, CD36, CRP, MCP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9 |
NF-κB signalling, oxidative stress pathway, inflammatory cytokine signalling, scavenger receptor pathway |
7,8 |
|
Hypertension |
Increased vascular resistance, endothelial dysfunction, vascular remodelling, sodium retention |
ACE, AGT, AGTR-1, AGTR2, ADD1, ADRB1, ADRB2, ATP2B1, CACNA1C, CACNB2, CYP11B2, CYP17A1, EDN1, ENPEP, FGF5, GNB3, HSD11B2, KCNJ1, KLKB1, MTHFR, NOS3, NPPA, NPPB, NPR1, PHACTR1, PDE3A, REN, SCNN1A, SCNN1B, SCNN1G, SH2B3, SLC12A3, SLC4A7, STK39, TGFB1, UMOD, WNK1, WNK4 |
Angiotensin II, Aldosterone, eNOS, Endothelin-1, CRP |
RAAS activation, NADPH oxidase pathway, ROS and NO signalling dysfunction |
9–11 |
|
Heart failure |
Ventricular remodelling, mitochondrial dysfunction, fibrosis, impaired calcium handling, apoptosis |
ACE, ADRB1, ADRB2, AGT, AGTR1, ANP (NPPA), BAG3, CACNA1C, CAMK2D, DES, DMD, DSP, FLNC, GATA4, LMNA, MYBPC3, MYH6, MYH7, NPPB, NPPA, PLN, RBM20, RYR2, SCN5A, TBX5, TCAP, TGFB1, TNNT2, TPM1, TTN |
BNP, ANP, SERCA2a, TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-1β |
β-adrenergic signalling, TGF-β/SMAD pathway, NLRP3 inflammasome, mitochondrial dysfunction |
12,13 |
|
Arrhythmias |
Abnormal impulse generation, altered ion channel activity, electrical instability |
ANK2, CACNA1C, CACNB2, CASQ2, DES, DSP, GJA5, GJA1, HCN4, KCNA5, KCND3, KCNH2, KCNJ2, KCNQ1, LMNA, NKX2-5, PKP2, PLN, RYR2, SCN1B, SCN5A, SNTA1, TBX5, TRDN KCNE1, RYR2 |
Sodium channels, Potassium channels, Ryanodine receptor, CA, SQ2 |
Ion channel signalling, calcium-handling pathway, autonomic signalling |
14,15 |
|
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) |
Myocardial hypertrophy, sarcomeric dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction |
ACTC1, ALPK3, CSRP3, DES, FLNC, GLA, LAMP2, MYBPC3, MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, MYL3, MYBPC3, PLN, PRKAG2, RAF1, TNNI3, TNNC1, TNNT2, TPM1, TTN |
β-myosin heavy chain, Troponin T, Myosin-binding protein C |
Sarcomeric signalling pathway, calcium-sensitivity pathway |
16,17 |
|
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) |
Ventricular dilation, systolic dysfunction, impaired cytoskeletal integrity |
ACTCI, BAG3, DES, DSP, DMD, FLNC, ILK, JPH2, LMNA, MYH7, NEXN, PLN, RBM20, SCN5A, TMEM43, TNNC1, TNNI3K, TPM1, TNNT2, TTN, VCL |
Titin, Lamin A/C, Desmin, Dystrophin |
Cytoskeletal remodelling, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptotic signalling |
18 |
|
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy |
Fibro-fatty myocardial replacement, ventricular arrhythmias |
CDH2, CTNNA3, DSP, JUP, KCNQ1, LEMD2, RYR2, TGFB3, TJP1, TMEM43, TP63, PKP2, |
Plakophilin-2, Desmoplakin, Plakoglobin |
Desmosomal signalling pathway, fibrosis signalling |
19,20 |
|
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) |
Coronary artery narrowing, myocardial ischemia, thrombosis |
ABCA1, ACE, ACTA2, ADAMTS7, AGTR1, ANGPTL3, ANRIL, APOA5, APOB, APOC3, APOE, CD40, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CETP, COL4A1, COL4A2, CXCL12, EDN1, F2, F5, GUCY1A3, HMGCR, ICAM1, IL1B, IL6, ITGA2B, ITGB3, JCAD, LDLR, LPA, LPL, MMP9, MRAS, NOS3, NPC1L1, P2RY12, PCSK9, PDGFD, PECAM-1, PHACTR-1, PLA2G7, PPARG, SCARB-1, SERPINE-1, SH2B3, SMAD3, SORT1, SVEP-1, TCF21, TGFBR2, THBD, TLR4, TNF, TRIB-1, VCAM-1, VEGFA, VWF |
HIF-1α, VEGF, Troponins, P2Y12 receptor |
Hypoxia signalling, platelet activation pathway, inflammatory signalling |
21 |
|
Stroke / cerebrovascular disease |
Cerebral ischemia, excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, neuronal apoptosis |
ACE, AGT, APOE, ATRNL-1, CADASIL (NOTCH3), COL4A1, COL4A2, CYP11B2, EDN1, F2, F5, FOXF2, GLA, HDAC9, HTRA-1, HBB, ICAM-1, IL6, MTHFR, NOS3, NOTCH3, PDE4D, PITX2, SERPINE1, SH2B3, TGFBR2, TNF, VCAM-1, VWF, ZFHX3 |
IL-6, TNF-α, MMPs, Glutamate |
Oxidative stress pathway, inflammatory signalling, apoptosis pathway |
22,23 |
|
Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) |
Peripheral ischemia, endothelial dysfunction, impaired perfusion |
ANRIL (CDKN2B-AS1), CD40, CHRNA3, DAB2IP, EDNRA, F5, HDAC9, HLA-B, ICAM-1, IL6, IPO5/RAP2A, LDLR, LPA, LPL, NOS3, OSBPL, PTPN-11, PAX2, SH2B3, SORT1/CELSR |
Endothelin-1, VEGF, CRP, ICAM-1 |
NO signalling dysfunction, hypoxia signalling, inflammatory pathways |
24,25 |
For decades, the key components of cardiovascular disease management have been possible because of the adopted traditional therapeutic approaches. These therapies aim to reduce cardiovascular mortality, prevent complications, including myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, heart failure, and stroke, alleviate symptoms, and control the progression of the disease. Although, these methods have improved the survival of patients, most traditional therapies primarily target the symptomatic manifestations and hemodynamic abnormalities, rather than focusing on the underlying molecular pathology26.
Lipid-lowering medications constitute the primary backbone of conventional CVD therapeutics. They are commonly used in the prevention and treatment of CAD and atherosclerosis. Statins are the first-line agents used in the therapeutic approach by blocking hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. The intracellular cholesterol synthesis and the upregulation of hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLR) can be lowered by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase. It can improve the LDL-C clearance from circulation. Statins have pleiotropic effects, which include better endothelial function, decreased oxidative stress, inhibition of inflammatory signalling, and atherosclerotic plaque stabilization27. Another major medication includes fibrates, work by promoting fatty acid oxidation and stimulating PPAR-α expression thereby ultimately lowering triglyceride production. Ezetimibe on the other hand, decreases intestinal cholesterol absorption by blocking Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1 (NPC1L1), whereas bile acids lower cholesterol levels by increasing the production of bile acid excretion28. Despite this therapeutic usefulness, traditional lipid-lowering medicines are often limited by several disadvantages such as statin intolerance, hepatotoxicity, myopathy, residual inflammatory risk, and varying patient response29.
Anti-hypertensive treatment mainly targets vascular resistance, fluid imbalance, and neurohormonal activation. The Angiotensin receptors blocker (ARBs) reduce the signalling of angiotensin type-1 receptor, and are widely used in heart failure, nephropathy, and hypertension. Therefore, the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II by inhibiting angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) results in decreasing oxidative stress, aldosterone secretion, vasoconstriction, and vascular remodelling. Beta-blockers block the β-adrenergic receptor signalling by lowering heart rate, sympathetic overactivation, myocardial oxygen demand, and arrhythmogenic risk. Calcium channel blockers on the other hand disrupt the L-type calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle and cardiomyocytes, increases vasodilation while lowering cardiac contractility. Diuretics reduce blood volume through enhanced sodium and water excretion, whereas renin inhibitors directly suppress renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) activation. These therapies although effectively decreases the blood pressure and cardiovascular events but its prolonged utilization has been reported to lead electrolyte imbalance, drug resistance, renal dysfunction, hypotension, and fatigue30.
Thrombosis and platelet aggregation play a significant role in myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Conventional medication such as aspirin inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) by reducing thromboxane A2-mediated platelet activation. P2Y12 receptor inhibitors such as clopidogrel and ticagrelor suppress ADP-mediated platelet aggregation and are commonly used in coronary interventions. Anticoagulants such as heparin, warfarin, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prevent thrombus formation by inhibiting the activation of the coagulation cascade. These drugs are widely used in atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and acute coronary syndromes. However, significant drawbacks include increased bleeding risk, limited therapeutic windows, medication interactions, and interindividual heterogeneity in therapeutic response31,32.
Heart failure management primarily focuses on suppressing neurohormonal activation and reducing ventricular activity. In these cases, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, ARBs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and diuretics have been used conventionally to enhance hemodynamic stability and lower hospitalization rates33. Specifically in case of increasing myocardial contractility digoxin works by inhibiting Na+/K+-ATPase action and raising intracellular calcium levels34. Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors such as dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have shown substantial cardioprotective effects by improving myocardial energy, reducing inflammation, and promoting osmotic diuresis. Given recent therapeutic improvements, standard heart failure medicines cannot completely repair myocardial fibrosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, or cardiomyocyte loss35.
Surgical and interventional procedures, in addition to pharmacological therapy, are crucial in the management of cardiovascular diseases. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with angioplasty and stent insertion is a standard procedure for restoring coronary blood flow after acute coronary syndrome. Drug-eluting stents prevent restenosis by reducing vascular smooth muscle growth. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common surgical treatment for severe multivessel coronary artery disease. Pacemakers, implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and catheter ablation treatments are used to treat cardiac rhythm abnormalities. Advanced heart failure patients may need ventricular assist devices (VADs) or a heart transplant. Although, these treatments considerably increase mortality and heart function, procedural complications, restenosis, thrombosis, graft failure, infection, and donor limits are still serious issues36–38.
3.2.6. Limitations of conventional therapies
Although conventional therapies have substantially reduced cardiovascular mortality, several limitations continue to hinder complete disease management. Most conventional drugs primarily alleviate symptoms and hemodynamic abnormalities rather than targeting molecular disease mechanisms. Long-term treatment dependency, drug intolerance, systemic toxicity, residual inflammatory risk, poor tissue regeneration, and patient non-compliance frequently reduce therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, conventional therapies often fail to provide personalized treatment responses due to genetic and metabolic variability among patients39.
Recent developments in molecular cardiology, translational medicine, regenerative biology, nanotechnology and computational sciences have altered cardiovascular treatments from being a generalized symptom-based care to precision-targeted. Although traditional cardiovascular therapy has significantly decreased morbidity and mortality, persistent residual cardiovascular risk, increasing, chronic inflammation, myocardial remodelling, endothelial dysfunction and irreversible tissue injury continue to limit long-term clinical results40. As a result, advanced therapeutic research is increasingly focused on finding disease-specific molecular pathways involved in mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid dysregulation, fibrosis, thrombosis, oxidative stress and genetic anomalies. This have permitted the development of methods based on innovative treatment which are capable of selectively modifying cardiovascular pathophysiology along with improving therapeutic specificity and minimizing systemic side effects41.
4.1. Targeted lipid-lowering molecular therapeutics
Despite the widespread statin usage, dyslipidemia and residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk continues to persist, and contribute to global surge of CVD morbidity and mortality cases. Although, statins efficiently lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by inhibiting hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, certain patients continue to display progressive atherosclerosis, recurrent ischemic episodes, and statin intolerance. Recent advancements have developed selective lipid-lowering therapies targeting specific pathways involved in cholesterol metabolism and transport of lipoprotein42.
One of the most significant achievements in cardiovascular therapy is the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. PCSK9 is a serine protease produced primarily in hepatocytes that interacts to hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLRs) and facilitates lysosomal breakdown. Increase in the activity of PCSK9 lowers LDLR recycling and increases circulating LDL-C levels, hastening lipid accumulation, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, foam cell production, and atherosclerotic plaque progression. The therapeutic relevance of PCSK9 inhibition was clearly established in the FOURIER and ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trials, which showed significant decreases in LDL-C levels and severe adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk cardiovascular patients. In addition to decreasing lipids, PCSK9 inhibitors have been shown to reduce vascular oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokine signalling, resulting in plaque stabilization. Despite their exceptional performance, widespread clinical utilization is limited by high treatment costs, injectable delivery, and accessibility limits43,44. Another major advancement in RNA therapies has enabled more precise lipid management via post-transcriptional gene silencing techniques. Inclisiran, a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapy, preferentially targets hepatic PCSK9 mRNA via RNA interference mechanisms, reducing PCSK9 synthesis and resulting in persistent LDL-C reduction with infrequent dose schedules. The ORION clinical trials showed that inclisiran treatment has long-term lipid-lowering effectiveness and good tolerability profiles45,46. Compared to monoclonal antibodies, siRNA treatments provide longer pharmacological efficacy and enhanced patient adherence; however, delivery efficiency, long-term safety, and large-scale accessibility all require additional assessment. Besides, various new molecular targets implicated in triglyceride metabolism and lipoprotein control are now being studied. Angiopoietin-like protein-3 (ANGPTL3), apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have received significant interest because of their strong connections with residual cardiovascular risk and atherogenesis. Elevated Lp(a) levels have also been identified as independent genetic risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve disease. Lp(a) causes endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, thrombosis, and plaque instability due to its proatherogenic and pro-inflammatory effects. As a result, other RNA-based therapies, such as pelacarsen and olpasiran, are now being studied for selective suppression of apolipoprotein(a) synthesis and decrease of circulating Lp(a) levels47,48. Simultaneously, breakthroughs in gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9 have opened up the possibility of long-term repair of dyslipidemia-related genetic defects. These findings suggest that future curative cardiovascular medicines could overcome the limits of lifetime pharmaceutical treatment. Nonetheless, off-target mutations, immunological activation, ethical concerns, and long-term genomic safety remain significant translational challenges to clinical application49.
4.2. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory strategies
Chronic inflammation is increasingly recognized as a major cause of CVD initiation and progression, especially in atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and vascular remodelling. Persistent inflammatory activation causes endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, foam cell production, plaque instability, myocardial fibrosis, and cardiomyocyte death by disrupting numerous cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and immunological signalling pathways. IL-1β has been found to be an important regulator of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. When the NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in macrophages, it converts pro-caspase-1 to active caspase-1, converting pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into active inflammatory variants. Elevated IL-1β signalling increases the expression of IL-6, TNF-α, vascular adhesion molecules, and reactive oxygen species, causing endothelial dysfunction, leukocyte recruitment, vascular smooth muscle proliferation, and plaque instability50. Clinical manifestation of targeting inflammation in cardiovascular therapy has also been demonstrated in CANTOS trial. Canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-1β has has reduced recurrent cardiovascular events without lowering cholesterol levels. These findings offered the first direct clinical evidence inhibiting inflammatory signalling, which reduce cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, reduction in circulating inflammatory indicators, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), has also been linked with improved cardiovascular outcomes which emphasizes the significance of inflammation as an independent therapeutic target51. It confirmed chronic low-grade inflammation significantly contributes to cardiovascular disease development, even after conventional therapy. Thus, in addition to inhibiting IL-1β, decreasing NLRP3 inflammasome signalling has also emerged as an important therapeutic approach. These aspects made the utilization of Colchicine, a microtubule polymerization inhibitor which was earlier known for treating gout and inflammatory illnesses by inhibiting neutrophil activation, inflammasome assembly, leukocyte adherence, and releasing cytokine. Its efficacy in case of CVD was demonstrated in COLCOT and LoDoCo2 studies where it was found that low-dose colchicine significantly reduced recurrent ischemic cardiovascular events and coronary sequelae in patients with established coronary artery disease52.
With the advancement in molecular techniques, other signalling pathways such as TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB, have been found to play a significant role in vascular inflammation, myocardial remodeling, and heart failure progression. Persistent activation of NF-κB signalling leads to increased production of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and fibrotic mediators, worsening vascular damage and myocardial dysfunction. Several medicines targeting IL-6 receptors, TNF-α signalling, and NF-κB-associated pathways are being investigated53. Additionally, studies have also identified oxidative stress-mediated inflammation as a prominent therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease. Excessive ROS production by NADPH oxidases, defective mitochondria, xanthine oxidase, and uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) contributes to lipid peroxidation, endothelial damage, inflammatory cytokine activation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. As a result, antioxidant-based therapies such as Nrf2 activators, mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants, and ROS-scavenging nanotherapeutics are increasingly being studied for the suppression of inflammatory cardiovascular injury. Research has also found significant linkages between metabolic dysfunction and inflammation in cardiovascular disease progression. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, such as dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, enhance glucose homeostasis while also lowering inflammatory signaling, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cardiac fibrosis. The DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced studies showed significant decreases in cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization after SGLT2 inhibition, underscoring the therapeutic significance of metabolic-inflammatory interaction in cardiovascular disease54.
4.3. Nanotechnology-based therapeutics
The complexity and multidimensionality of cardiovascular diseases can limit the efficacy of traditional pharmacological therapy due to inadequate tissue selectivity, limited drug absorption, systemic toxicity, and incorrect intracellular transport. These restrictions have hastened the adoption of nanotechnology in cardiovascular medicine, particularly for targeted drug administration, molecular imaging, controlled therapeutic release, and precision cardiovascular intervention. Atherosclerotic plaques and inflamed vascular regions exhibit enhanced endothelial permeability, oxidative stress, inflammatory activation, and changed cellular microenvironments, allowing for selective nanoparticle accumulation within diseased tissues. Several nanocarrier systems, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, micelles, metallic nanoparticles, and biomimetic nanovesicles, have been developed for cardiovascular applications by leveraging these pathological properties55. In experimental cardiovascular models, these formulations such as AZ7379, temoporfin (mTHPC) etc., have been found to enhance plaque targeting while reducing systemic toxicity56. Nanotechnology has also made substantial advancement in RNA-based cardiovascular therapies as quick disintegration and low cellular uptake, siRNAs, antisense oligonucleotides, and CRISPR-associated nucleic acids continue to face significant barriers to effective intracellular delivery57. Another significant innovation has been observed in biomimetic and cell-membrane-coated nanoparticles, which have improved immune evasion and tissue-specific targeting abilities. Platelet membrane-coated nanoparticles, macrophage-derived nanovesicles, and exosome-mimetic systems can selectively accumulate in inflamed vascular lesions and thrombotic areas by interacting with adhesion molecules and inflammatory mediators58.
Nanotechnology has also altered cardiovascular imaging and diagnostics by enabling the development of nano-theranostic systems that can detect and treat diseases simultaneously. The effectiveness of these combinatorial advancements has been evidenced in clinical researches, where using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, quantum dots, and contrast-enhanced nanoprobes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and fluorescence imaging has improved visualization of vascular inflammation, plaque instability, myocardial fibrosis, and ischemic injury. Thus, integrating therapeutic and diagnostic activities inside a single nanosystem allows real-time monitoring of disease development and therapeutic response but its design-precision and implementing requires rigorous number of clinical trails59.
4.4. Regenerative medicine and stem cell therapy
Regenerative medicine seeks to heal and restore injured myocardium through tissue repair, angiogenesis, and cardiomyocyte regeneration. Irreversible cardiomyocyte loss and poor intrinsic regenerative potential continue to be key difficulties in cardiovascular disease management, especially after myocardial infarction, ischemic injury, or chronic heart failure. As a result, regenerative medicine and stem cell-based therapies have developed as potential methods for myocardial repair, angiogenesis, tissue regeneration, and cardiac function restoration. Stem cells are the most well investigated of these techniques due to their immunomodulatory qualities, minimal immunogenicity, and ability to release growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles that aid in tissue repair. MSC-derived paracrine signalling enhances angiogenesis via the VEGF, FGF, and HGF pathways, while reducing inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. MSCs inhibit myocardial fibrosis and apoptosis by regulating TGF-β, PI3K/Akt, and ERK signalling pathways. Through the creation of cardiac scaffolds, hydrogels, bioengineered patches, and three-dimensional bio printed cardiac constructions, recent developments in tissue engineering and biomaterial sciences have further improved regenerative treatment approaches. These biomaterials aid in cellular integration into injured myocardium, enhance stem cell retention, and offer structural support. Exosome-based treatments have become a promising cell-free regeneration strategy at the same time. Without the dangers of direct stem cell transplantation, microRNAs, proteins, lipids, and signalling molecules found in stem-cell-derived exosomes can promote angiogenesis, reduce oxidative stress, suppress inflammation, and improve cardiomyocyte lifespan. However, by addressing the underlying constraint of irreversible cardiac injury, stem cell treatment and regenerative medicine represent significant advances in cardiovascular therapies. Future myocardial repair and cardiac regeneration may be greatly enhanced by the integration of stem cell engineering, tissue biomaterials, gene editing, exosome therapies, and precision regenerative techniques60,61.
4.5. Advanced surgical and interventional cardiovascular techniques
Continuous advancements in cardiovascular surgery and interventional cardiology have substantially improved the management of complex structural and ischemic heart diseases. Conventional surgical approaches, although highly effective, are frequently associated with extensive tissue injury, prolonged hospitalization, perioperative complications, and delayed recovery. As a result, recent technology advances have focused on minimally invasive, image-guided, and precision-based cardiovascular therapies that can reduce procedural trauma while enhancing clinical outcomes. These sophisticated procedures combine robots, catheter-based interventions, biomaterial engineering, and hybrid surgical platforms to improve procedural precision, cardiovascular repair, and long-term patient survival62.
Among the most notable advancements, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, especially in elderly and high-risk surgical patients. Unlike traditional surgical valve replacement, which requires open-heart surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass, TAVR uses catheters to implant bioprosthetic valves via transfemoral or transapical access. This surgical method minimizes perioperative mortality, inpatient duration, inflammatory damage, and healing time. TAVR mechanically restores valvular hemodynamics by replacing calcified and stenotic aortic valves while avoiding cardiac tension and widespread inflammatory response caused by conventional surgical operations. The PARTNER and Core Valve trials strongly verified TAVR's clinical efficacy, demonstrating lower mortality and better functional results than traditional surgery in selected patient categories. Furthermore, technological advancements in valve design, imaging guidance, and delivery systems have increased procedural safety and made TAVR available to intermediate and low-risk patients. However, problems such as paravalvular leak, vascular damage, prosthesis deterioration, stroke risk, and conduction anomalies necessitate permanent pacemaker implantation which, limits its widespread therapeutic usage63,64. Further, advancements in invasive robotic techniques decreased systemic inflammatory reactions, oxidative stress, endothelial injury, and neurohormonal activation, which are often associated with significant surgical trauma. Although these techniques showed advanced and precision benefits, robotic cardiovascular surgery has been often constrained by high procedure costs, steep learning curves, extended operating times, and a scarcity of specialist surgical infrastructure65. Consecutively, bioengineered vascular grafts and tissue-engineered cardiovascular substitutes have also emerged as promising replacements for synthetic graft materials and donor tissues. Conventional vascular grafts are prone to thrombosis, calcification, restricted biocompatibility, and graft failure due to persistent inflammatory activation and reduced endothelialization. To address these constraints, bioengineered grafts made of biodegradable polymers, extracellular matrix scaffolds, stem-cell-seeded biomaterials, and de-cellularized tissues has been being created which would imitate natural vascular architecture along with facilitating tissue regeneration. These grafts promote endothelial cell adhesion, vascular smooth muscle architecture, extracellular matrix remodelling, and angiogenesis by modulating integrin signalling, growth factor release, and mechano-transduction pathways66. Furthermore, incorporating stem cells, growth hormones, and nanomaterials into bioengineered scaffolds promotes vascular regeneration while reducing inflammatory reactions. Experimental and early clinical studies have also demonstrated and validated the promising outcomes in small-diameter vascular reconstruction, coronary bypass surgery, and valvular tissue engineering. However, its long-term durability, immunological compatibility, biomaterial degradation, and large-scale manufacturing make up the major translational obstacles67. Despite these challenges, advanced surgical and interventional techniques represent a major evolution in cardiovascular therapeutics by integrating minimally invasive technology, regenerative engineering, and precision cardiovascular repair68.
Figure 1. Evolutionary map of therapeutic strategy for treatment of cardiac disorders
Despite significant development in pharmacological and therapeutic management, the global burden of cardiovascular diseases highlights the urgent need for more effective and mechanism-based therapeutic strategies. While conventional cardiovascular treatment improved survival and reduced disease-associated complications, persistent residual cardiovascular risk, recurrent adverse events, progressive myocardial remodelling, and incomplete tissue repair continue to limit long-term clinical outcomes. Moreover, the diverse nature of cardiovascular disorders involving oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, mitochondrial impairment, and genetic disorders necessitates targeted therapeutic approaches which could both regulate disease both at genotypic and phenotypic level. Recent advances in molecular cardiology have therefore established novel therapeutic paradigms that mainly focused targeted pathway modulation and disease interception. Importantly, major clinical trials have validated several of these strategies, thereby confirming precise modulation of inflammatory, metabolic, and genetic pathways can substantially improve cardiovascular outcomes beyond conventional standards of care. However, these advancements also face critical challenges including delivery specificity, long-term genomic safety, immune compatibility, biomaterial toxicity, procedural scalability, and equitable accessibility which hinder the translational perspectives. Therefore, the quantitative evaluation (Table 2) of traditional and advanced cardiovascular treatments is essential for understanding their fundamental differences, clinical efficacy, translational potential, and their associated limitation which would suggest the sustainable and equitable utilization of advancements to the patients69,70.
Table 2. Detailed comparative overview of conventional and advanced cardiovascular therapeutic strategies
|
Parameter |
Conventional therapies |
Advanced/Recent therapeutic approaches |
|
Primary therapeutic Goal |
Symptom control and hemodynamic stabilization |
Disease-specific molecular targeting and precision intervention |
|
Major targets |
Blood pressure, cholesterol, thrombosis, cardiac workload |
Genes, inflammatory mediators, RNA pathways, regenerative signalling |
|
Mechanism of action |
Broad pharmacological modulation |
Precision-targeted molecular and cellular modulation |
|
Representative therapies |
Statins, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, CABG |
PCSK9 inhibitors, siRNA therapeutics, CRISPR-Cas9, stem cells, nanomedicine |
|
Therapeutic specificity |
Moderate |
High |
|
Regenerative capacity |
Minimal |
Potential myocardial regeneration and tissue repair |
|
Duration of treatment |
Lifelong chronic therapy |
Long-acting or potentially curative interventions |
|
Personalization |
Limited |
Genomics- and biomarker-guided personalized therapy |
|
Advantages |
Widely available, clinically established, cost-effective |
Improved specificity, reduced residual risk, molecular precision |
|
Limitations |
Drug intolerance, adverse effects, residual cardiovascular risk |
High cost, delivery barriers, immunogenicity, ethical concerns |
|
Surgical approaches |
CABG, valve replacement, angioplasty |
TAVR, robotic surgery, bioengineered grafts, hybrid interventions |
|
Future potential |
Symptomatic management |
Disease modification and precision cardiovascular medicine |
The emerging treatment for cardiovascular disorders is experiencing a significant shift from being generalized hemodynamic management to molecularly stratified and precision targeted therapy. The increasing evidence studied showed that the cardiovascular pathogenesis involves complex interactions between inflammatory signalling, reprogramming, improper mitochondrial functioning, oxidative stress, endothelial injury, lack of proper regulation of genetics and fibrosis. As a result of this, the traditional medicines which are clinically transformed are insufficient to fully eliminate the residual cardiovascular risk or reverse ongoing myocardial and vascular remodelling. The recent breakthroughs made in the field of molecular cardiology have resulted in the development of novel treatment, based on pathway-specific regulation and prevention of disease. Further, RNA interference therapeutics, inflammasome-targeted immunomodulation, PSK9 inhibition, CRISPR-based genome editing, regenerative stem cell platforms, nanotechnology enabling the drug delivery, have shown the growing convergence of molecular medicine, bioengineering, and translational cardiovascular science. Most importantly, the improved clinical trials have proved that these techniques, which demonstrated the modulation of inflammatory, metabolic and genetic pathways can significantly improve the cardiovascular outcomes above and beyond the traditional methods of treatment. However, future successful clinical translation, necessitate higher resolution techniques possessing potential to face critical challenges such as the delivery specificity, long-term genomic safety, immunological compatibility, biomaterial toxicity, procedural scalability and fair access. Furthermore, the integration of multimodal techniques combined with the genetics, regenerative engineering, AI, and precision diagnostics has enabled personalised diagnostics to predict illness, target intervention and repair myocardial dysfunction etc. sustainable utilization of such convergence-driven solutions could eventually transform cardiovascular medicine from chronic disease management to biologically precise and potentially curative therapy.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declares no conflict of interest
Acknowledgement: The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude Ms. Pyari Payal Beura & Sulagna Dash Mohapatra, PhD. scholar for their assistance with completion of this review article. The authors further acknowledge other members of the SKR Laboratory for their continuous support and constructive suggestions throughout various stages of this study. All authors contributed to the intellectual development of the manuscript and participated in its critical revision and final approval.
Funding Source: This work was funded by Science and Technology Department Government of Odisha (ST-BT-MISC-0009-2022-2744) and Mukhyamantri Research Fellowships, Odisha.
References
1. WHO. Cardiovascular diseases [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases
2. Ghodeshwar GK, Dube A, Khobragade D. Impact of Lifestyle Modifications on Cardiovascular Health: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 15(7):e42616. doi:10.7759/cureus.42616 PubMed PMID: 37641769;
3. Frąk W, Wojtasińska A, Lisińska W, Młynarska E, Franczyk B, Rysz J. Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Diseases: New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis, Arterial Hypertension, and Coronary Artery Disease. Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 10;10(8):1938. PMC9405799. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081938 PMid:36009488
4. Foëx P. Innovations in management of cardiac disease: drugs, treatment strategies and technology. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017 Dec 1;119:i23-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex327 PMid:29161389
5. Netala VR, Teertam SK, Li H, Zhang Z. A Comprehensive Review of Cardiovascular Disease Management: Cardiac Biomarkers, Imaging Modalities, Pharmacotherapy, Surgical Interventions, and Herbal Remedies. Cells. 2024 Sep 1;13(17):1471.https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13171471 PMid:39273041
6. Addissouky TA, Sayed IETE, Ali MMA, Alubiady MHS, Wang Y. Recent developments in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of cardiovascular diseases through artificial intelligence and other innovative approaches. J Biomed Res. 2024 Mar 12;Volume 5(Issue 1):29-40. https://doi.org/10.46439/biomedres.5.041
7. Ajoolabady A, Pratico D, Lin L, Mantzoros CS, Bahijri S, Tuomilehto J, et al. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: pathophysiology and mechanisms. Cell Death Dis. 2024 Nov 11;15(11):817. PMCid:PMC11555284 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-07166-8 PMid:39528464
8. Pahwa R, Jialal I. Atherosclerosis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026. PubMed PMID: 29939576. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507799/
9. Harrison DG, Coffman TM, Wilcox CS. Pathophysiology of Hypertension. Circulation Research. 2021 Apr 2;128(7):847-63. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318082 PMid:33793328 PMCid:PMC8023760
10. Chen FY, Lee CW, Chen YJ, Lin YH, Yeh CF, Lin CC, et al. Pathophysiology and blood pressure measurements of hypertension in the elderly. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2025 Jul 1;Elderly Hypertension124:S10-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.027 PMid:40328594
11. Deepshikha null, Mathur P, Monika null, Jhawat V, Shekhar S, Dutt R, et al. An Overview of Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Modern Management. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2025;21(2):64-81. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734021349254250224074832 PMid:40051353
12. Schwinger RHG. Pathophysiology of heart failure. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Feb;11(1):263-76. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-20-302 PMid:33708498 PMCid:PMC7944197
13. Mann DL, Felker GM. Mechanisms and Models in Heart Failure. Circulation Research. 2021 May 14;128(10):1435-50. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318158 PMid:33983832 PMCid:PMC8130816
14. Keating MT, Sanguinetti MC. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Cardiac Arrhythmias. Cell. 2001 Feb 23;104(4):569-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00243-4 PMid:11239413
15. Wilde AAM, Bezzina CR. Genetics of cardiac arrhythmias. Heart. 2005 Oct;91(10):1352-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2004.046334 PMid:16162633 PMCid:PMC1769155
16. Lopes LR, Ho CY, Elliott PM. Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: established and emerging implications for clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2024 Aug 7;45(30):2727-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae421 PMid:38984491 PMCid:PMC11313585
17. Hespe S, Waddell A, Asatryan B, Owens E, Thaxton C, Adduru ML, et al. Genes Associated With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Reappraisal by the ClinGen Hereditary Cardiovascular Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025 Feb 25;Special Focus Issue: Heart Failure85(7):727-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.12.010 PMid:39971408 PMCid:PMC12079304
18. Eldemire R, Mestroni L, Taylor MRG. Genetics of Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Annu Rev Med. 2024 Jan 29;75:417-26. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-052422-020535 PubMed PMID: 37788487; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10842880. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-052422-020535 PMid:37788487 PMCid:PMC10842880
19. Mazzanti A, Kukavica D, Trancuccio A, Scilabra GG, Coppini L, Pergola V, et al. Genetics in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies: where are we now and where are we heading to? Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Feb 1;27(Supplement_1):i98-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae114 PMid:39980788 PMCid:PMC11836680
20. Gerull B, Brodehl A. Insights Into Genetics and Pathophysiology of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2021;18(6):378-90. PubMed PMID: 34478111; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8616880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-021-00532-z PMid:34478111 PMCid:PMC8616880
21. Kessler T, Schunkert H. Coronary Artery Disease Genetics Enlightened by Genome-Wide Association Studies. JACC: Basic to Translational Science. 2021 Jul;6(7):610-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.04.001 PMid:34368511 PMCid:PMC8326228
22. Shehjar F, Mahajan R, Shahnaz S, Shah ZA. Genetic and epigenetic architectures of stroke: Insights from GWAS to precision medicine. Neurochemistry International. 2025 Nov 1;190:106059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2025.106059 PMid:41005670 PMCid:PMC13261748
23. Yoshimoto T, Yamagami H, Matsumaru Y. Recent Advances in Stroke Genetics-Unraveling the Complexity of Cerebral Infarction: A Brief Review. Genes. 2025 Jan 6;16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16010059 PMid:39858606 PMCid:PMC11764629
24. Kullo IJ, Leeper NJ. The Genetic Basis of Peripheral Arterial Disease: Current Knowledge, Challenges and Future Directions. Circ Res. 2015 Apr 24;116(9):1551-60. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303518 PMid:25908728 PMCid:PMC4410432
25. Ochoa Chaar CI, Kim T, Alameddine D, DeWan A, Guzman R, Dardik A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the genetics of peripheral arterial disease. JVS Vasc Sci. 2024;5:100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100133 PMid:38314202 PMCid:PMC10832467
26. Gladwell LR, Ahiarah C, Rasheed S, Rahman SM, Choudhury M. Traditional Therapeutics and Potential Epidrugs for CVD: Why Not Both? Life (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;14(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14010023 PMid:38255639 PMCid:PMC10820772
27. Ramkumar S, Raghunath A, Raghunath S. Statin Therapy: Review of Safety and Potential Side Effects. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016 Nov;32(6):631-9. doi:10.6515/ACS20160611A PubMed PMID: 27899849;
28. Chhetry M, Jialal I. Lipid-Lowering Drug Therapy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 11]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541128/ PubMed PMID: 31082172.
29. Kypreos KE, Bitzur R, Karavia EA, Xepapadaki E, Panayiotakopoulos G, Constantinou C. Pharmacological Management of Dyslipidemia in Atherosclerosis: Limitations, Challenges, and New Therapeutic Opportunities. Angiology. 2019 Mar 1;70(3):197-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319718779533 PMid:29862840
30. Khalil H, Zeltser R. Antihypertensive Medications. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 [cited 2026 May 28]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554579/ PubMed PMID: 32119466.
31. Eikelboom JW, Hirsh J, Spencer FA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI. Antiplatelet Drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. CHEST. 2012 Feb 1;141(2):e89S-e119S. 22315278. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-2293 PMid:22315278 PMCid:PMC3278069
32. Bikdeli B, Ujueta F, Rashedi S, Talasaz AH, Kadakia KT, Lopes RD, et al. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy in the 2025 ACC/AHA Guideline for Acute Coronary Syndromes. JACC. 2025 Jun 10;85(22):2074-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.002 PMid:40467132
33. Ioannou A, Massa P, Patel RK, Razvi Y, Porcari A, Rauf MU, et al. Conventional heart failure therapy in cardiac ATTR amyloidosis. European Heart Journal. 2023 May 22;44(31):2893. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad347 PMid:37216684 PMCid:PMC10424879
34. Scranton K, John S, Angelini M, Zhang R, Schwingshackl A, Goldhaber JI, et al. The mechanism of action of digoxin requires the sodium-dependent inactivation of the sodium-calcium exchanger. Science Advances. 2025 Dec 17;11(51):eady9596. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ady9596 PMid:41406234 PMCid:PMC12710698
35. Padda IS, Mahtani AU, Parmar M. Sodium-Glucose Transport 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 [cited 2026 May 28]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576405/ PubMed PMID: 35015430.
36. Allam M, Akowuah E. Common cardiac surgical procedures: bypass, valve repair and replacement. Surgery (Oxford). 2024 Feb 1;Cardiothoracic Surgery - I42(2):98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2023.12.013
37. Szlapka M, Hetzer R, Ennker J, Hausmann H. Conventional cardiac surgery in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease: yesterday and today. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2021 Feb;11(1):20212-20212. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-20-284 PMid:33708493 PMCid:PMC7944224
38. Massera D, Sherrid MV, Scheinerman JA, Swistel DG, Razzouk L. Medical, Surgical, and Interventional Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2025 Mar;18(3). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014023 PMid:39925290
39. Doenst T, Kirov H, Bagiella E, Scherag A, Omerovic E. Challenges of conventional and novel approaches to clinical trial designs in cardiovascular medicine. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 4;67(3):ezaf056. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf056 PMid:39980154
40. Townsend N, Timmis A, Erglis A, Miličić D, Perrone-Filardi P, Weidinger F, et al. Challenges in the prevention, treatment and management of cardiovascular disease among older adults. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Aug 21;56:101372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101372 PMid:41200013 PMCid:PMC12587328
41. Addissouky TA, Sayed IETE, Ali MMA, Alubiady MHS, Wang Y. Recent developments in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of cardiovascular diseases through artificial intelligence and other innovative approaches. J Biomed Res. 2024 Mar 12;Volume 5(Issue 1):29-40. https://doi.org/10.46439/biomedres.5.041
42. Strandberg TE. Benefits and limitations of statin use in primary cardiovascular prevention: recent advances. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022 May 30;132(5):16258. PubMed PMID: 35635404. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16258 PMid:35635404
43. Xu J, Shapiro MD. Current Evidence and Future Directions of PCSK9 Inhibition. US Cardiol. 2021 Feb 16;15:e01. https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2020.17 PMid:39720497 PMCid:PMC11664773
44. Furtado RHM, Giugliano RP. What Lessons Have We Learned and What Remains to be Clarified for PCSK9 Inhibitors? A Review of FOURIER and ODYSSEY Outcomes Trials. Cardiol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00163-w PMid:32026310 PMCid:PMC7237602
45. Blom DJ, Marais AD, Moodley R, van der Merwe N, van Tonder A, Raal FJ. RNA-based therapy in the management of lipid disorders: a review. Lipids Health Dis. 2022 Apr 23;21(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01649-3 PMid:35459248 PMCid:PMC9034497
46. Ray KK, Wright RS, Kallend D, Koenig W, Leiter LA, Raal FJ, et al. Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1507-19. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1912387 PMid:32187462
47. Bhatia HS, Bajaj A, Goonewardena SN, Moriarty PM. Pelacarsen: Mechanism of action and Lp(a)-lowering effect. Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2025 Sep 1;19(5):1208-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.06.004 PMid:40781022
48. Tweneboah C, Kaur G. Lowering of Lipoprotein(a) with Olpasiran. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2026 Mar 23. https://doi.org/10.2174/011871529X428489260113103704 PMid:41879443
49. Pande S. CRISPR-Cas9 gene therapy in dyslipidemia: a leap into the future? Postgrad Med J. 2026 Feb 25;qgag019. doi:10.1093/postmj/qgag019 https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgag019 PMid:41739631
50. Mensah GA, Arnold N, Prabhu SD, Ridker PM, Welty FK. Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: 2025 ACC Scientific Statement. JACC. 2026 Mar 24;87(11):1381-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.047 PMid:41020749
51. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1119-31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707914 PMid:28845751
52. Nidorf SM, Fiolet ATL, Mosterd A, Eikelboom JW, Schut A, Opstal TSJ, et al. Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 Nov 4;383(19):1838-47. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2021372 PMid:32865380 PMCid:PMC11530513
53. Huang S, Frangogiannis NG. Anti‐inflammatory therapies in myocardial infarction: failures, hopes and challenges. Br J Pharmacol. 2018 May;175(9):1377-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14155 PMid:29394499 PMCid:PMC5901181
54. Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. The Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):819-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31824-9 PMid:32877652 PMCid:PMC9668858
55. Mao Y an, Shi X, Sun P, Spanos M, Zhu L, Chen H, et al. Nanomedicines for cardiovascular diseases: Lessons learned and pathways forward. Biomaterials. 2025 Sep 1;320:123271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123271 PMid:40117750
56. Safhi AY, Albariqi AH, Sabei FY, Alsalhi A, Khalil FMA, Waheed A, et al. Journey into tomorrow: cardiovascular wellbeing transformed by nano-scale innovations. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2024 Apr 1;49(4):102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102428 PMid:38311274
57. Lima ES, Santos D dos, Souza AL, Macedo ME, Bandeira ME, Junior SSS, et al. RNA Combined with Nanoformulation to Advance Therapeutic Technologies. Pharmaceuticals. 2023 Nov 21;16(12). doi:10.3390/ph16121634 https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121634 PMid:38139761 PMCid:PMC10745936
58. Zhang S, Han M, Li S, Wang Y, Wu L, Dong L, et al. Platelet-derived biomimetic nanoplatforms: a promising drug delivery strategy for cardiovascular disease. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025 Oct 21;23(1):687. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-025-03700-8 PMid:41121084 PMCid:PMC12542209
59. Wu Y, Vazquez-Prada KX, Liu Y, Whittaker AK, Zhang R, Ta HT. Recent Advances in the Development of Theranostic Nanoparticles for Cardiovascular Diseases. Nanotheranostics. 2021 Jul 21;5(4):499-514. https://doi.org/10.7150/ntno.62730 PMid:34367883 PMCid:PMC8342263
60. Goto T, Nakamura Y, Ito Y, Miyagawa S. Regenerative medicine in cardiovascular disease. Regenerative Therapy. 2024 Jun 1;26:859-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2024.09.004 PMid:39430582 PMCid:PMC11490749
61. Razavi ZS, Farokhi S, Mahmoudvand G, Karimi-Rouzbahani A, Farasati-Far B, Tahmasebi-Ghorabi S, et al. Stem cells and bio scaffolds for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases: new insights. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Dec 12;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1472103 PMid:39726717 PMCid:PMC11669526
62. Idhrees M, Zainulabedin H, Varun G. The interventional cardiovascular surgeon-the future. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jan;40(1):116-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01653-x PMid:38125326 PMCid:PMC10728418
63. Leon MB, Mack MJ, Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Thourani VH, Kodali SH, et al. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at 7 Years. New England Journal of Medicine. 2026 Feb 18;394(8):773-83. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2509766 PMid:41144631
64. Salgado RA, Budde RPJ, Leiner T, Shivalkar B, Van Herck PL, Op de Beeck BJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: postoperative CT findings of Sapien and CoreValve transcatheter heart valves. Radiographics. 2014 Oct;34(6):1517-36. PubMed PMID: 25310415. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.346130149 PMid:25310415
65. Bonatti J, Vetrovec G, Riga C, Wazni O, Stadler P. Robotic technology in cardiovascular medicine. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 May;11(5):266-75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.23 PMid:24663088
66. Luo X, Pang Z, Li J, Anh M, Kim BS, Gao G. Bioengineered human arterial equivalent and its applications from vascular graft to in vitro disease modeling. iScience. 2024 Nov 15;27(11):111215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111215 PMid:39555400 PMCid:PMC11565542
67. Razavi ZS, Farokhi S, Mahmoudvand G, Karimi-Rouzbahani A, Farasati-Far B, Tahmasebi-Ghorabi S, et al. Stem cells and bio scaffolds for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases: new insights. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Dec 12;12:1472103. . https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1472103 PMid:39726717 PMCid:PMC11669526
68. Li R. Advancements and Future Directions in Cardiovascular and Vascular Surgeries. JSM Atherosclerosis. 2024 Jul 29;5(1):1-2. doi:10.47739/2573-1270/1045
69. Kishimoto S, Higashi Y. Recent advances and emerging perspectives in vascular and cardiovascular research: A 2025 update. Hypertens Res. 2026 Mar;49(3):740-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02540-1 PMid:41514023 PMCid:PMC12960199
70. Wawage DS, Devasena DI, Parate DV, Singh DA. Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Systematic Review. European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine [Internet]. 2024 Dec 16 [cited 2026 May 28];14:587-91. Available from: https://healthcare-bulletin.co.uk/article/innovations-in-cardiovascular-disease-prevention-systematic-review--2634/