Available online on 15.06.2026 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
To develop and evaluate a Carbopol-based hydrogel containing Moringa oleifera root extract for antioxidant and antimicrobial diabetic wound management
Pratik Sanjeev Gunale1, Aditya Uttam Waghmare1, Kiran C. Rodage1, Sameer Shafi1, V.M. Dharashive1, Kavita Shivkumar Sirgire1
1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Shivlingeshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala, Latur, India
|
Article Info: _______________________________________________ Article History:
Received 10 March 2026 Reviewed 23 April 2026 Accepted 19 May 2026 Published 15 June 2026 _______________________________________________ Cite this article as: For Correspondence: Kiran C Rodage, Department of Pharmaceutics, Shivlingeshwar College of Pharmacy, Almala, Latur, India |
Abstract _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Background: Diabetic wounds are characterized by oxidative stress and infection, leading to delayed healing. Objective: To develop a Carbopol-based hydrogel incorporating Moringa oleifera root extract. Methods: Hydrogel formulations (F1–F6) were prepared and evaluated for physicochemical properties, drug release, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. Results: Batch F4 showed optimal pH (6.2), viscosity (15800 cP), and 98% drug release within 6 hours. Release followed Korsmeyer–Peppas kinetics (R² = 0.9864), indicating non-Fickian diffusion. The formulation exhibited significant antioxidant (~70%) and antimicrobial activity (24 mm zone). Conclusion: The developed hydrogel demonstrates strong potential for diabetic wound management. Keywords: Carbopol hydrogel, Moringa oleifera, diabetic wound, antioxidant, antimicrobial, drug release
|
1. INTRODUCTION
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or a combination of both. It is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases globally, posing a major burden on healthcare systems due to its progressive nature and associated complications. The global prevalence of diabetes has increased dramatically over the past few decades due to factors such as sedentary lifestyle, obesity, aging population, and genetic predisposition. Chronic hyperglycemia leads to long-term damage, dysfunction, and failure of various organs, particularly the eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart, and blood vessels 1,2.
Among the various complications, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are considered one of the most serious and economically burdensome conditions. DFUs significantly reduce the quality of life of patients and are a leading cause of hospitalization in diabetic individuals. It has been estimated that approximately 15–25% of diabetic patients will develop foot ulcers during their lifetime, and recurrence rates are notably high even after successful treatment 1,2.
Hydrogels are three-dimensional, hydrophilic polymeric networks capable of absorbing and retaining large amounts of water while maintaining structural integrity. Due to their high-water content and biocompatibility, hydrogels closely resemble natural extracellular matrix, making them highly suitable for wound healing applications 3,4.
Hydrogels provide a moist environment that facilitates cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. They also promote autolytic debridement, which helps in the removal of necrotic tissue without damaging healthy cells. Furthermore, hydrogels act as effective carriers for bioactive molecules, enabling localized and controlled drug delivery 5,6.
Hydrogels offer several advantages, including excellent moisture retention, non-adhesive nature, ease of application, and ability to conform to irregular wound surfaces. These properties significantly enhance patient comfort and compliance 5,6.
Hydrogels can be engineered to release drugs in a controlled manner, thereby reducing systemic side effects and improving therapeutic efficacy. Recent advancements include stimuli-responsive hydrogels, antimicrobial hydrogels, and injectable hydrogels that respond to environmental triggers such as pH and temperature 7,8,9.
Moringa oleifera, commonly referred to as the drumstick tree or “miracle tree,” is a fast-growing, drought-resistant plant belonging to the family Moringaceae. It is widely distributed across tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, Africa, and South America and has been extensively utilized in traditional systems of medicine such as Ayurveda due to its broad spectrum of therapeutic properties 10,11. The plant is characterized by its high nutritional value and diverse phytochemical profile, making it an important candidate in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications.
Various parts of the plant, including leaves, seeds, roots, bark, and flowers, possess significant medicinal value. Among these, the roots are particularly rich in bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenolic constituents, which contribute to their antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities 12. These pharmacological properties make Moringa oleifera highly relevant in wound healing applications, especially in chronic conditions like diabetic wounds where oxidative stress and infection play a critical role. Additionally, its low toxicity, easy availability, and cost-effectiveness further enhance its suitability for incorporation into advanced drug delivery systems such as hydrogels.
The therapeutic efficacy of Moringa oleifera is primarily attributed to its rich and diverse phytochemical composition, which includes a wide range of bioactive compounds with significant pharmacological activities 13,14.
The plant contains major phytoconstituents such as flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol), phenolic acids, alkaloids, saponins, tannins, vitamins (A, C, E), and essential minerals including calcium, potassium, and iron. These compounds act synergistically to produce antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and wound healing effects. The presence of vitamins and minerals also supports cellular metabolism and tissue regeneration, which are essential for effective wound repair.
Phenolic compounds play a crucial role in neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) by donating hydrogen atoms or electrons, thereby reducing oxidative stress and preventing cellular damage 14. Similarly, flavonoids exhibit strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and are known to enhance collagen synthesis and angiogenesis, which are critical steps in the wound healing process 15. The combined action of these phytochemicals significantly contributes to the therapeutic potential of Moringa oleifera in biomedical applications.
Oxidative stress is one of the primary factors responsible for delayed wound healing, particularly in diabetic patients. Moringa oleifera exhibits potent antioxidant activity through multiple mechanisms that help restore redox balance in the wound environment 16.
The plant’s bioactive compounds act as free radical scavengers by donating electrons to neutralize reactive oxygen species, thereby preventing oxidative damage to cellular components such as lipids, proteins, and DNA 16. In addition to direct scavenging, Moringa oleifera enhances the activity of endogenous antioxidant defense systems, including enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase. These enzymes play a vital role in detoxifying harmful free radicals and maintaining cellular homeostasis.
Furthermore, Moringa oleifera inhibits lipid peroxidation, a process that damages cell membranes and impairs tissue regeneration. By preserving membrane integrity and preventing oxidative degradation, the plant facilitates faster wound healing and tissue repair 17. These multifaceted antioxidant mechanisms make it highly effective in managing oxidative stress-associated complications in diabetic wounds.
Microbial infection is a significant challenge in wound management, particularly in diabetic patients where immune function is compromised. Moringa oleifera demonstrates broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens, making it highly suitable for wound care applications 13,18.
The antimicrobial action of Moringa oleifera is attributed to its ability to disrupt microbial cell membranes, leading to leakage of intracellular contents and eventual cell death. It also inhibits protein synthesis and interferes with essential microbial enzyme systems, thereby preventing microbial growth and proliferation.
Studies have shown that Moringa oleifera is effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungal species 18. This broad-spectrum activity helps reduce microbial load, prevent infection, and create a conducive environment for wound healing. The use of natural antimicrobial agents like Moringa oleifera also reduces the risk of antibiotic resistance, making it a safer and more sustainable alternative to synthetic drugs.
Inflammation is a critical phase of wound healing; however, excessive or prolonged inflammation can delay the healing process. Moringa oleifera exhibits significant anti-inflammatory activity, which helps regulate the inflammatory response and promotes faster healing 15.
The synergistic effects of combined therapy include reduction of reactive oxygen species, prevention of microbial colonization, and acceleration of tissue repair processes 19,20. By simultaneously targeting multiple pathways, this approach enhances overall healing efficiency and reduces the risk of complications.
The anti-inflammatory effects are mediated through the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukins, as well as the suppression of prostaglandin synthesis. These actions help reduce swelling, redness, and pain at the wound site.
Therefore, this study aims to develop a Carbopol-based herbal hydrogel for improved wound healing.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Materials and formulation table:
Table 1: formulation table
|
Ingredients |
F1 (g) |
F2 (g) |
F3 (g) |
F4 (g) |
F5 (g) |
F6 (g) |
|
Carbopol 934 |
0.25 |
0.50 |
0.75 |
1.00 |
1.25 |
1.50 |
|
Moringa oleifera Root Extract |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Propylene Glycol |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
|
Methyl Paraben |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
|
Propyl Paraben |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
Triethanolamine |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
|
Distilled Water |
q.s to 50 g |
q.s to 50 g |
q.s to 50 g |
q.s to 50 g |
q.s to 50 g |
q.s to 50 g |
2.2 Extraction
1. Extraction of Plant Material
The selected plant material was collected from a suitable source and authenticated by a qualified botanist. It was washed with distilled water, shade dried at room temperature, and coarsely powdered using a mechanical grinder. The powdered material was sieved and stored in an airtight container. Extraction was carried out by maceration using a suitable solvent for 48–72 h with intermittent shaking. The extract was filtered through muslin cloth and Whatman filter paper No. 1, concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator at 40–50°C, dried in a desiccator, and stored at 4°C until further use.
2. Qualitative Phytochemical Screening
The extract was subjected to preliminary phytochemical screening for alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and phenolic compounds using standard chemical tests such as Dragendorff’s, Mayer’s, Shinoda, ferric chloride, foam, and gelatin tests. The development of characteristic color changes or precipitates indicated the presence of corresponding phytoconstituents.
3. Preformulation Studies
Preformulation studies included evaluation of organoleptic properties, solubility, melting point, pH, λmax, calibration curve, and FTIR analysis. Solubility was determined in different solvents, and λmax was identified using UV-visible spectrophotometry in the range of 200–400 nm. A calibration curve was prepared at the determined λmax. FTIR spectroscopy was performed using the KBr pellet method to identify functional groups and possible drug–excipient interactions.
2.3 Formulation
Six formulations (F1–F6) were prepared using varying concentrations of Carbopol 940. The polymer was dispersed in water, followed by addition of excipients and extract. The pH was adjusted using triethanolamine to obtain gel consistency.
2.4 Evaluation
The formulated gel was evaluated for various parameters:
Physical appearance, pH, Viscosity, Spreadability, Extrudability, Drug content, In-vitro diffusion study, Kinetic modeling, Antibacterial activity, Anti-inflammatory activity and Anti-oxidant
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Plant material collection, authentication, washing and drying.
3.1.1 Plant material collection
Moringa oleifera Lam. belongs to the family Moringaceae. This medicinal plant is widely reported to be used traditionally for wound healing and possesses significant pharmacological activities. The plant material was collected from the local area of Virar, Maharashtra, India.
3.1.2 Authentication of Plant Species
The plant material was identified and authenticated by the Department of Botany, Dayanand Science College, Latur. They confirmed that the plant specimen provided was Moringa oleifera Lam., belonging to the family Moringaceae (root). The authentication certificate is provided below.
Figure 2: Authentication of Plant Species
3.1.3 Washing and Drying of Plant Roots
Roots of Moringa oleifera were washed thoroughly and cleaned with running tap water followed by distilled water to remove adhering soil and other impurities. The cleaned roots were then shade dried at room temperature to preserve the active constituents. The dried roots were ground into coarse powder using an electric blender. The powdered plant material was stored in a dark place at room temperature for further use.
3.1.4 Preparation of Extract
The dried and powdered roots of Moringa oleifera were subjected to extraction by maceration method. A known quantity of powdered material was soaked in a suitable solvent (such as ethanol/methanol/distilled water) in a closed container and kept for 48–72 hours with occasional stirring.
After maceration, the mixture was filtered using Whatman filter paper to separate the extract from the marc. The filtrate was then concentrated by evaporation of solvent using a water bath at controlled temperature to obtain a semisolid extract.
The obtained extract was stored in an airtight container at room temperature for further use.
3.2 QUALITATIVE PHYTOCHEMICALS SCREENING
1. Tests for Alkaloids
Observation: Formation of orange or reddish-brown precipitate.
Result: Presence of alkaloids was confirmed.
Figure 3: Tests for Alkaloids
2. Flavonoids Test
Reagent: Lead acetate solution
Observation: Formation of yellow precipitate.
Result: Presence of flavonoids was confirmed.
3. Tannins Test
Reagent: Ferric chloride solution
Observation: Formation of blue-black or greenish-black coloration.
Result: Presence of tannins was confirmed.
4. Phenolic Compounds Test
Reagent: Ferric chloride solution
Observation: Formation of deep blue or green coloration.
Result: Presence of phenolic compounds was confirmed.
5. Saponins Test
Observation: Formation of stable persistent foam.
Result: Presence of saponins was confirmed.
Figure 4: Preparation of Extract
3.3 PREFORMULATION STUDIES
1. Organoleptic Evaluation
The drug sample was evaluated for its organoleptic characteristics, and the observations are presented in Table below.
Table 2: Organoleptic Evaluation
|
Parameter |
Observation |
|
Color |
Brown / Dark brown (typical for plant extract) |
|
Odor |
Characteristic |
|
Taste |
Bitter |
|
Physical State |
Solid / Powder |
The drug exhibited characteristic organoleptic properties, confirming its natural origin and purity without any abnormal appearance or odor.
2. Solubility Studies
The solubility of the drug was determined in different solvents, and the results are summarized below:
Table 3: Solubility Studies
|
Solvent |
Solubility |
|
Distilled Water |
Slightly soluble |
|
Ethanol |
Soluble |
|
Methanol |
Freely soluble |
|
Phosphate Buffer (pH 6.8) |
Moderately soluble |
|
Phosphate Buffer (pH 7.4) |
Moderately soluble |
The drug showed good solubility in organic solvents like methanol and ethanol, indicating the presence of polar phytoconstituents such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds.
3. pH Determination
The pH of 1% w/v solution of the drug was found to be:
pH = 6.2 – 6.8
4. Melting Point Determination
The melting point of the drug sample was determined using the capillary method.
Observed Melting Point: 210°C – 225°C
5. Preparation of Calibration Curve
The calibration curve of Moringa oleifera root extract was prepared using methanol as solvent. Standard solutions were prepared in the concentration range of 2–10 µg/mL, and absorbance was measured at 272 nm using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer.
Table 4: Calibration data of Moringa oleifera root extract
|
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Absorbance |
|
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
0.208 |
|
4 |
0.405 |
|
6 |
0.598 |
|
8 |
0.792 |
|
10 |
0.985 |
The absorbance was found to increase proportionally with an increase in concentration, indicating good linearity.
Figure 5: Calibration Curve of Moringa oleifera Root Extract
Figure 6: UV spectroscopy study
6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
6.1 FTIR For Pure Extract
The infrared spectrum of Moringa oleifera root extract was recorded using an FTIR spectrophotometer. The obtained spectrum was compared with standard functional group frequencies of plant phytoconstituents.
Figure 7: FTIR Spectrum of Moringa oleifera Root Extract
The observed functional group frequencies of Moringa oleifera root extract were found to be within the reported range of standard values, which confirms the presence of various bioactive compounds such as phenols, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins. The presence of characteristic peaks corresponding to different functional groups indicates the purity and authenticity of the extract.
Table 5: FTIR Peak Interpretation of Moringa oleifera Root Extract
|
Sr. No. |
Observed Frequency (cm⁻¹) |
Standard Frequency (cm⁻¹) |
Functional Group / Assignment |
|
1 |
3292–3388 |
3200–3400 |
O–H stretching (Alcohols, Phenols) |
|
2 |
2958–3007 |
2850–3000 |
C–H stretching (Alkanes) |
|
3 |
1641 |
1600–1650 |
C=O stretching / C=C (Aromatic ring) |
|
4 |
1519–1562 |
1500–1600 |
C=C stretching (Aromatic compounds) |
|
5 |
1402–1477 |
1400–1450 |
C–H bending |
|
6 |
1273–1323 |
1250–1350 |
C–O stretching (Phenols, Esters) |
|
7 |
1190–1211 |
1150–1250 |
C–O stretching (Alcohols, Ethers) |
|
8 |
1028–1078 |
1000–1100 |
C–O stretching (Primary alcohols) |
|
9 |
707–742 |
700–900 |
C–H bending (Aromatic rings) |
|
10 |
1730 |
1700–1750 |
C=O stretching (Carbonyl compounds) |
6.2 Drug and Excipient Compatibility Study
Figure 8: FTIR Spectrum of Extract with Excipients
FTIR Interpretation of Moringa oleifera Root Extract with Excipients (Compatibility Study)
Table 6: FTIR Interpretation of Moringa oleifera Root Extract with Excipients
|
Sr. No. |
Observed Frequency (cm⁻¹) |
Standard Frequency (cm⁻¹) |
Functional Group / Assignment |
|
1 |
3290–3385 |
3200–3400 |
O–H stretching (Phenols, Alcohols) |
|
2 |
2920–2955 |
2850–3000 |
C–H stretching (Alkanes, excipient polymers) |
|
3 |
1640–1650 |
1600–1650 |
C=O stretching / C=C (Aromatic compounds) |
|
4 |
1515–1560 |
1500–1600 |
C=C stretching (Aromatic ring) |
|
5 |
1400–1450 |
1400–1450 |
C–H bending |
|
6 |
1260–1320 |
1250–1350 |
C–O stretching (Phenols, Esters) |
|
7 |
1150–1210 |
1150–1250 |
C–O stretching (Alcohols, Ethers) |
|
8 |
1020–1080 |
1000–1100 |
C–O stretching (Primary alcohols, polysaccharides) |
|
9 |
700–850 |
700–900 |
C–H bending (Aromatic rings) |
The FTIR spectrum of Moringa oleifera root extract with excipients showed characteristic peaks corresponding to hydroxyl, carbonyl, aromatic, and ether functional groups. All observed frequencies were found within the standard reported ranges. The peaks of the extract were retained in the formulation without significant shifting or disappearance, indicating absence of chemical interaction between the extract and excipients. This confirms the compatibility and stability of the formulation components.
3.4 EVALUATION OF HYDROGEL
1. Physical Appearance
All formulated batches (F1–F6) were visually inspected for color, homogeneity, consistency, and presence of any lumps or phase separation.
Table 7: Physical Appearance
|
Batch |
Colour |
Homogeneity |
Consistency |
|
F1 |
Light brown |
Good |
Smooth |
|
F2 |
Light brown |
Good |
Smooth |
|
F3 |
Brown |
Good |
Smooth |
|
F4 |
Brown |
Excellent |
Smooth |
|
F5 |
Dark brown |
Good |
Slightly thick |
|
F6 |
Dark brown |
Good |
Thick |
2. Determination of pH
The pH of all formulated Carbopol-based hydrogels (F1–F6) incorporating Moringa oleifera root extract was determined using a calibrated digital pH meter. Approximately 1 g of gel from each batch was dispersed in distilled water and measured at room temperature.
Table 8: Determination of pH
|
Batch |
pH Value |
|
F1 |
5.6 |
|
F2 |
5.8 |
|
F3 |
6.0 |
|
F4 |
6.2 |
|
F5 |
6.4 |
|
F6 |
6.5 |
3. Extrudability
Extrudability was determined by measuring the force required to extrude the gel from a collapsible tube. All formulations exhibited good extrudability. Batch F4 showed smooth and uniform extrusion.
Table 10: Extrudability
|
Batch |
Extrudability |
|
F1 |
Good |
|
F2 |
Good |
|
F3 |
Very Good |
|
F4 |
Excellent |
|
F5 |
Good |
|
F6 |
Moderate |
4. Spreadability
Spreadability was determined using glass slide method by measuring the time required to spread the gel. All batches showed good spreadability. Batch F4 exhibited optimal spreading with good consistency.
Table 11: Spreadability
|
Batch |
Spreadability (g·cm/sec) |
|
F1 |
18.5 |
|
F2 |
16.2 |
|
F3 |
14.0 |
|
F4 |
12.3 |
|
F5 |
10.8 |
|
F6 |
9.2 |
5. Washability
Washability was evaluated by applying gel on skin and washing with water. All formulations were easily washable, indicating good patient compliance.
Table 12: Washability
|
Batch |
Washability |
|
F1 |
Good |
|
F2 |
Good |
|
F3 |
Very Good |
|
F4 |
Excellent |
|
F5 |
Good |
|
F6 |
Moderate |
6. Viscosity Measurement
Viscosity of the gel formulations was measured using a Brookfield viscometer at suitable rpm. All batches showed appropriate viscosity, with variation depending on polymer concentration. Batch F4 showed optimum viscosity.
Table 13: Viscosity Measurement
|
Batch |
Viscosity (cP) |
|
F1 |
4500 |
|
F2 |
7800 |
|
F3 |
11500 |
|
F4 |
15800 |
|
F5 |
19500 |
|
F6 |
23000 |
7. In-vitro Diffusion Study
Figure 9: In-vitro Diffusion Study
The in-vitro diffusion study of the herbal gel was carried out using a diffusion cell with a suitable membrane. The gel was placed in the donor compartment, and the receptor compartment was filled with an appropriate diffusion medium maintained at constant temperature. Samples were withdrawn at predetermined time intervals and analyzed spectrophotometrically to determine the amount of drug diffused. Diffusion study was carried out using Franz diffusion cell with suitable membrane. All formulations showed controlled drug release. Batch F4 showed optimum diffusion profile.
Table 14: In-vitro Diffusion Study
|
Time |
F1 (%) |
F2 (%) |
F3 (%) |
F4 (%) |
F5 (%) |
F6 (%) |
|
15 min |
8 |
10 |
12 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
|
30 min |
15 |
18 |
22 |
25 |
22 |
18 |
|
1 hr |
28 |
32 |
36 |
40 |
35 |
30 |
|
2 hr |
45 |
50 |
55 |
60 |
52 |
46 |
|
3 hr |
60 |
66 |
72 |
78 |
68 |
60 |
|
4 hr |
72 |
78 |
84 |
88 |
76 |
68 |
|
5 hr |
82 |
88 |
92 |
95 |
82 |
74 |
|
6 hr |
90 |
94 |
96 |
98 |
88 |
80 |
Figure 10: Graph of F1-F6 In-vitro Diffusion Study
8. In vitro Release Kinetics
The results obtained from the in vitro diffusion study of Moringa oleifera root extract from Carbopol-based hydrogel formulations (F1–F6) were fitted into various kinetic models to describe the drug release behavior.
The release data were analyzed using different kinetic models, namely Zero-order, First-order, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer–Peppas models.
Various kinetic parameters such as the release rate constant (k), regression coefficient (R²), and diffusional exponent (n) were calculated for each model. The model showing the highest R² value was considered as the best-fit model, indicating the mechanism governing the release of the active constituents from the hydrogel system.
Table 15: Data of Zero-order Kinetics of F4 batch
|
Time (hr) |
Cumulative % Drug Release |
|
0.25 |
14 |
|
0.50 |
25 |
|
1.00 |
40 |
|
2.00 |
60 |
|
3.00 |
78 |
|
4.00 |
88 |
|
5.00 |
95 |
|
6.00 |
98 |
Figure 11: Zero-order Release Kinetics
Table 16: Data of First order Kinetics of F4 batch
|
Time (hr) |
Log (% Drug Remaining) |
|
0.25 |
1.9345 |
|
0.50 |
1.8751 |
|
1.00 |
1.7782 |
|
2.00 |
1.6021 |
|
3.00 |
1.3424 |
|
4.00 |
1.0792 |
|
5.00 |
0.6990 |
|
6.00 |
0.3010 |
Fig.12 irst Order Release Kinetics
Table 17: Data of Higuchi Model Kinetics of F4 batch
|
Square Root of Time (hr) |
Cumulative % Drug Release |
|
0.500 |
14 |
|
0.707 |
25 |
|
1.000 |
40 |
|
1.414 |
60 |
|
1.732 |
78 |
|
2.000 |
88 |
|
2.236 |
95 |
|
2.449 |
98 |
Figure 13: Higuchi Diffusion Kinetic
Table 18: Data of Korsmeyer-Peppas Model of Kinetics of F4 batch
|
Log Time (loghr) |
Log % Drug Release |
|
-0.6021 |
1.1461 |
|
-0.3010 |
1.3979 |
|
0.0000 |
1.6021 |
|
0.3010 |
1.7782 |
|
0.4771 |
1.8921 |
|
0.6021 |
1.9445 |
|
0.6990 |
1.9777 |
|
0.7782 |
1.9912 |
Figure 14: Peppas Release Kinetics
Summary of Kinetic Parameters for Batch F4
Table 19: Summary of Kinetic Parameters for Batch F4
|
Kinetic Model |
Regression Equation |
R2 Value |
|
Zero Order |
y = 14.639x + 22.452 |
0.9222 |
|
First Order |
y = -0.2735x + 2.0700 |
0.9796 |
|
Higuchi |
y = 45.054x - 5.5508 |
0.9862 |
|
Korsmeyer-Peppas |
y = 0.6146x + 1.5661 |
0.9864 |
Batch F4 showed the best fit with the Higuchi and Korsmeyer–Peppas models, indicating that drug release is primarily governed by diffusion mechanisms. The Peppas exponent (n = 0.6146) lies between 0.5 and 1, which confirms non-Fickian (anomalous) transport. This means the drug release occurs through a combined mechanism of diffusion and polymer swelling/relaxation, rather than purely diffusion-controlled release.
Regression Analysis (R2) and Release Exponent (n) for All Batches
Table 20: Regression Analysis (R2) and Release Exponent (n) for All Batches
|
Batch |
Zero Order (R2) |
First Order (R2) |
Higuchi (R2) |
Peppas (R2) |
n value |
|
F1 |
0.9720 |
0.9837 |
0.9993 |
0.9938 |
0.7579 |
|
F2 |
0.9613 |
0.9794 |
0.9982 |
0.9933 |
0.7061 |
|
F3 |
0.9425 |
0.9849 |
0.9934 |
0.9900 |
0.6543 |
|
F4 |
0.9222 |
0.9796 |
0.9862 |
0.9864 |
0.6146 |
|
F5 |
0.9333 |
0.9981 |
0.9912 |
0.9869 |
0.6185 |
|
F6 |
0.9422 |
0.9964 |
0.9943 |
0.9895 |
0.6502 |
Best Fit Model and Release Mechanism
Table 21: Best Fit Model and Release Mechanism
|
Batch |
Best Fit Model |
Release Mechanism (n value range) |
|
F1 |
Higuchi |
Non-Fickian (Anomalous) Transport |
|
F2 |
Higuchi |
Non-Fickian (Anomalous) Transport |
|
F3 |
Higuchi |
Non-Fickian (Anomalous) Transport |
|
F4 |
Korsmeyer-Peppas |
Non-Fickian (Anomalous) Transport |
|
F5 |
First Order |
Non-Fickian (Anomalous) Transport |
|
F6 |
First Order |
Non-Fickian (Anomalous) Transport |
Conclusion
Batch F4 was identified as the optimized formulation because it exhibited the highest cumulative drug release (98% in 6 hours) and followed the Korsmeyer-Peppas model with an R2 of 0.9864. The release exponent (n = 0.6146) indicates a balanced Anomalous Transport mechanism. Unlike other batches that showed concentration-dependent decay (F5, F6) or lower total release (F1, F2), F4 provided a near-complete and controlled diffusion profile, making it the most effective candidate for sustained herbal delivery.
9. In-vitro Antimicrobial Study
RESULTS:
Antibacterial activity of test compound against E. coli
Table 22: Antibacterial activity of test compound against E. coli
|
SR.NO |
SAMPLES |
ZONE IN DIAMETER (mm) |
|
1 |
Control |
00 |
|
2 |
Standard (Streptomycin) |
28 |
|
3 |
Moringa root extract herbal gel |
24 |
Image Activity:
Figure 15: Antimicrobial Test
Conclusion of the study:
The antibacterial profile of Moringa root extract herbal gel was evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition against E. coli (ATCC 25922) bacterial strains via well diffusion method. The compound Moringa root extract herbal gel exhibited good antibacterial activity as compared to the standard streptomycin.
10. Anti-inflammatory Study
In vitro anti-inflammatory activity by Protein denaturation method
The reaction mixture (10 mL) consisted of 0.4 mL of egg albumin (from fresh hen’s egg), 5.6 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 6.4) and 100 µL of different concentrations of test sample (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 μg/mL). Similar volume of double-distilled water served as control. Then the mixtures were incubated at (37℃±2) in a incubator for 15 min and then heated at 70℃ for 5 min. After cooling, their absorbance was measured at 660 nm by using vehicle as blank. Diclofenac sodium at the concentration was used as reference drug and treated similarly for determination of absorbance. The percentage inhibition of protein denaturation was calculated by using the following equation,
% of Inhibition = C –T/ C
Where,
T = absorbance of test sample
C = absorbance of control
Table 23: In vitro anti-inflammatory activity
|
|
|
|
Protein denaturation assay |
|||||
|
SR.NO |
Sample code |
Concentrations (µg/ml) |
Absorbance at 660 nm |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Mean |
% of Inhibition |
IC50 (µg/ml) |
|
1 |
Control |
|
1.54 |
1.54 |
1.54 |
1.54 |
- |
72.21
|
|
2 |
Standard (Diclofenac Sodium) |
20 |
1.40 |
1.37 |
1.39 |
1.39 |
9.74% |
|
|
|
|
40 |
1.20 |
1.20 |
1.22 |
1.21 |
21.43% |
|
|
|
|
60 |
0.91 |
0.89 |
0.93 |
0.91 |
40.91% |
|
|
|
|
80 |
0.67 |
0.65 |
0.63 |
0.65 |
57.79% |
|
|
|
|
100 |
0.21 |
0.18 |
0.23 |
0.21 |
86.36% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Moringa root extract herbal gel |
20 |
1.45 |
1.48 |
1.51 |
1.48 |
3.90% |
98.70 |
|
|
|
40 |
1.33 |
1.36 |
1.39 |
1.36 |
11.69% |
|
|
|
|
60 |
1.12 |
1.17 |
1.19 |
1.16 |
24.68% |
|
|
|
|
80 |
0.95 |
0.93 |
0.97 |
0.95 |
38.31% |
|
|
|
|
100 |
0.72 |
0.75 |
0.79 |
0.75 |
51.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graphical data:
Figure 16: Anti-inflammatory Study
Images of the activity:
Fig. 17 In vitro anti-inflammatory activity by Protein denaturation method
Conclusion
The anti-inflammatory activity assessed by the protein denaturation assay (PDA method) shows a clear concentration-dependent increase in percentage inhibition for both the standard and the Moringa root extract herbal gel. As the concentration increases from 20 to 100 µg/mL, the standard exhibits a strong rise in inhibition, reaching a maximum of around 85–90%, indicating potent anti-inflammatory activity. The Moringa root extract gel also demonstrates a gradual increase in inhibition, attaining approximately 50% at the highest concentration. Although its activity is lower compared to the standard, the consistent dose-dependent response suggests that the herbal gel possesses moderate anti-inflammatory potential. These findings indicate that Moringa root extract may serve as a promising natural anti-inflammatory agent, albeit with comparatively reduced potency.
11. Antioxidant Study
Observation table:
Table 24: Antioxidant Study activity
|
SR.NO |
Sample Code |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Absorbance at 510nm |
% Inhibition |
IC50 (µg/ml) |
|||
|
|
|
|
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test 3 |
Mean |
|
|
|
1 |
Control |
- |
1.93 |
1.93 |
1.93 |
1.93 |
- |
|
|
2 |
Standard |
20 |
1.45 |
1.42 |
1.40 |
1.42 |
26.42% |
72.49 |
|
|
(Ascorbic Acid) |
40 |
1.31 |
1.29 |
1.33 |
1.31 |
32.12% |
|
|
|
|
60 |
0.95 |
0.97 |
0.93 |
0.95 |
50.77% |
|
|
|
|
80 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
57.51% |
|
|
|
|
100 |
0.35 |
0.32 |
0.32 |
0.33 |
82.90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Moringa root extract herbal gel |
20 |
1.81 |
1.88 |
1.85 |
1.85 |
4.15% |
74.04 |
|
|
|
40 |
1.49 |
1.52 |
1.57 |
1.53 |
20.73% |
|
|
|
|
60 |
1.16 |
1.12 |
1.15 |
1.14 |
40.93% |
|
|
|
|
80 |
0.88 |
0.82 |
0.86 |
0.85 |
55.96% |
|
|
|
|
100 |
0.65 |
0.63 |
0.69 |
0.66 |
65.80% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graphical data:
Figure 18: Antioxidant Study
Images of the activity:
Figure 19: Antioxidant Activity by using DPPH
Conclusion of the study:
The DPPH antioxidant assay results indicate that both the standard and the Moringa root extract herbal gel exhibit a concentration-dependent increase in free radical scavenging activity. As the concentration rises from 20 to 100 µg/ml, the percentage inhibition gradually increases, reflecting improved antioxidant potential. The standard shows higher activity at all concentrations, reaching maximum inhibition of around 80–85% at 100 µg/ml, whereas the herbal gel also demonstrates notable activity, achieving approximately 65–70% inhibition at the same concentration. Although slightly lower than the standard, the Moringa root extract herbal gel displays significant antioxidant activity, suggesting the presence of effective phytoconstituents and indicating its potential as a natural antioxidant agent.
4. DISCUSSION
Moringa oleifera Lam., belonging to the family Moringaceae, was selected based on its well-documented traditional use and pharmacological properties. The plant roots were collected, authenticated, washed, shade-dried, and powdered. The extract was prepared using the maceration method and further concentrated for experimental use.
Preliminary phytochemical screening confirmed the presence of important bioactive constituents such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, phenolic compounds, and saponins, which are known to contribute to wound healing through antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.
Preformulation studies indicated that the extract possessed acceptable physicochemical properties, including characteristic colour, odor, and bitter taste. It showed good solubility in methanol and ethanol, and the pH was found to be near neutral, making it suitable for topical application. The λmax was determined at 272 nm, and FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of functional groups corresponding to various phytoconstituents. Compatibility studies revealed no significant interaction between the extract and excipients.
A series of Carbopol-based hydrogel formulations (F1–F6) were prepared and evaluated for physicochemical parameters such as pH, viscosity, spreadability, extrudability, washability, and homogeneity. All formulations showed acceptable properties for topical use.
Among all batches, formulation F4 was identified as the optimized formulation due to its excellent physicochemical characteristics, including ideal pH (6.2), good spreadability, optimum viscosity, and superior extrudability.
In-vitro diffusion studies demonstrated controlled drug release from all formulations, with F4 showing maximum drug release (98% within 6 hours). Kinetic modeling indicated that drug release followed Higuchi and Korsmeyer–Peppas models, confirming a non-Fickian (anomalous) diffusion mechanism.
The antimicrobial study revealed that the formulated hydrogel exhibited significant antibacterial activity against E. coli, showing a considerable zone of inhibition when compared to the standard drug streptomycin.
The anti-inflammatory activity evaluated using the protein denaturation method showed a concentration-dependent increase in inhibition. Although less potent than diclofenac sodium, the formulation demonstrated moderate anti-inflammatory activity.
The antioxidant activity assessed by the DPPH method showed that the hydrogel possesses significant free radical scavenging activity, with inhibition increasing proportionally with concentration, indicating its potential to reduce oxidative stress in diabetic wounds.
5. CONCLUSION
The present study successfully formulated and evaluated a Carbopol-based hydrogel incorporating Moringa oleifera root extract for the management of diabetic wounds.
The findings confirm that the herbal extract contains bioactive phytoconstituents responsible for antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities, all of which are essential for effective wound healing, especially in diabetic conditions.
The developed hydrogel formulations exhibited satisfactory physicochemical properties suitable for topical application. Among them, batch F4 was identified as the optimized formulation due to its superior performance in terms of drug release, stability, and overall evaluation parameters.
The formulation demonstrated:
The drug release followed a non-Fickian diffusion mechanism, ensuring controlled and sustained release of active constituents, which is beneficial for prolonged therapeutic action in chronic wounds such as diabetic ulcers.
Overall, the study suggests that the developed Carbopol-based herbal hydrogel is a promising, safe, and effective topical drug delivery system for diabetic wound management.
Acknowledgement: The authors are grateful to Shivlingeshwar College of Pharmacy for providing necessary facilities and also grateful to Infinite Biotech laboratory.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367-75. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1615439 PMid:28614678
2. Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005;293(2):217-28. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.2.217 PMid:15644549
3. Ahmed EM. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J Adv Res. 2015;6(2):105-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 PMid:25750745 PMCid:PMC4348459
4. Peppas NA, et al. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50(1):27-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00090-4 PMid:10840191
5. Li J, Mooney DJ. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1(12):16071. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71 PMid:29657852 PMCid:PMC5898614
6. Caló E, Khutoryanskiy VV. Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products. Eur Polym J. 2015; 65:252-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024
7. Jain A, et al. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels in wound healing: Advances and challenges. Int J Pharm. 2021; 603:120670.
8. Liu M, et al. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive hydrogels for wound healing. Biomater Sci. 2019;7(7):2571-91.
9. Gulzar A, Gani A. Plant-based bioactive molecules as wound healing agents: Mechanisms and future perspectives. Phytomedicine. 2020; 70:153222.
10. Mbikay M. Therapeutic potential of Moringa oleifera leaves in chronic hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia: A review. Front Pharmacol. 2012; 3:24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00024 PMid:22403543 PMCid:PMC3290775
11. Anwar F, Latif S, Ashraf M, Gilani AH. Moringa oleifera: A food plant with multiple medicinal uses. Phytother Res. 2007;21(1):17-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2023 PMid:17089328 PMCid:PMC13168555
12. Gupta N, et al. Moringa oleifera: Uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2012;5(4):28-32.
13. Ndhlala AR, et al. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and phytochemical variations in 13 Moringa oleifera Lam. cultivars. Molecules. 2014;19(7):10440-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190710480 PMid:25045889 PMCid:PMC6271396
14. Sreelatha S, Padma PR. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Moringa oleifera leaves in two stages of maturity. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2009;64(4):303-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-009-0141-0 PMid:19904611
15. Chauhan N, et al. Role of phytochemicals in diabetic wound healing: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:698147.
16. Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509359125 PMid:20139336
17. Schultz GS, et al. Wound bed preparation: A systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11 Suppl 1:S1-28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.11.s2.1.x PMid:12654015
18. Chuang PH, Lee CW, Chou JY, Murugan M, Shieh BJ, Chen HM. Anti-fungal activity of crude extracts and essential oil of Moringa oleifera Lam. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(1):232-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.11.003 PMid:16406607
19. Krishnasamy K, et al. Phytochemical-loaded polymeric hydrogels for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021; 183:2062-75.
20. Sabir F, et al. Recent trends in hydrogels for diabetic wound healing: Advances and challenges. J Control Release. 2021; 332:481-99.
21. Kouchak M, Ameri A. Nasal drug delivery using carbopol-based gels. Adv Pharm Bull. 2014;4(3):253-61.
22. Saha S, Pal A, Kundu S, Basu S. Wound healing activity of herbal hydrogel formulations. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020; 55:101408.
23. Das S, Baker AB. Biomaterials and nanotherapeutics for enhancing skin wound healing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016; 4:82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00082 PMid:27843895 PMCid:PMC5087310
24. Augustine R, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S. Advancement of wound care from grafts to bioengineered smart skin substitutes. Prog Biomater. 2014;3(2-4):103-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-014-0030-y PMid:29470769 PMCid:PMC5299852
25. Purna SK, Babu M. Collagen based dressings-A review. Burns. 2000;26(1):54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(99)00103-5 PMid:10630321
26. Gopalakrishnan A, Ram M, Kumawat S, et al. Herbal-based hydrogels for wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022; 68:103061.
27. Khan MI, Giridhar R. Recent advances in herbal drug delivery for wound healing. Curr Drug Deliv. 2020;17(9):828-43.
28. Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK. Nanoemulsion: An advanced mode of drug delivery system. Biotech. 2015;5(2):123-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-014-0214-0 PMid:28324579 PMCid:PMC4362737