Available online on 15.05.2024 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
Formulation and Evaluation of Betulin Loaded Transdermal Patches
Sahil Bhardwaj *, Ajeet Pal Singh , Amar Pal Singh
Department of Pharmaceutics, St. Soldier institute of pharmacy, Lidhran Campus, Behind NIT (R.E.C.), Jalandhar –Amritsar by pass, NH-1, Jalandhar -144011, Punjab, India
|
Article Info: ___________________________________________ Article History: Received 06 March 2024 Reviewed 04 April 2024 Accepted 26 April 2024 Published 15 May 2024 ___________________________________________ Cite this article as: Bhardwaj S, Singh AP, Singh AP, Formulation and Evaluation of Betulin Loaded Transdermal Patches, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2024; 14(5):113-121 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v14i5.6578 ___________________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: Sahil Bhardwaj, Department of Pharmaceutics, St. Soldier institute of pharmacy, Lidhran Campus, Behind NIT (R.E.C.), Jalandhar –Amritsar by pass, NH-1, Jalandhar -144011, Punjab, India |
Abstract ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Objectives: To develop and evaluate Transdermal patches of Betulin along with various polymers for controlled release action. Method: Suitable method such as Solvent Casting Technique of Film Casting Technique are used for preparation of Transdermal patch. Result: The prepared Transdermal patches were transparent, smooth, uniform and flexible. The method adopted for preparation of system was found satisfactory. Conclusion: Various formulations were developed by using hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers like HPMC E5 and EC respectively in single and combinations by solvent evaporation technique with incorporation of penetration enhancer such as dimethylsulfoxide and dibutyl phthalate as plasticizer. Formulation F7 containing equal ratio of HPMC E5: EC (5:5) showed maximum percentage drug content 95.44%. A suitable UV Spectroscopy method for the analysis of Betulin was developed. Betulin showed maximum absorption at wave length 215 nm in isotonic phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) solutions. The pre-formulation studies involving description, solubility, melting point, partition coefficient of the drug were found to be comparable with the standard. The Transdermal patch of Betulin was prepared successfully by solvent evaporation method. Transdermal patch of Betulin for Transdermal drug delivery was evaluated. Calibration curve was obtained; Transdermal film was prepared, overcome limitations regarding bioavailability of drug was done. Keywords: Controlled DDS, Transdermal DDS, Betulin, Transdermal Patch, solvent evaporation method.
|
INTRODUCTION
Transdermal delivery system is currently available for treatment of various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, fungal diseases, depression, anxiety and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), skin cancer, female sexual dysfunction, post-menopausal bone loss and urinary incontinence. Transdermal drug delivery system constitutes one of the most important routes for new drug delivery system. Transdermal delivery of drug offers several advantages over conventional delivery methods. The controlled drug delivery is a newer approach is to deliver drug in to systemic circulation at a predetermined rate. Following skin permeation, the drugs first reach the systemic circulation. The drug molecules are then transported to the target site, which could be relatively remote from the site of administration, to produce therapeutic action. A novel drug delivery approach known as controlled release drug delivery system evolves, which facilitates the drug release into systemic circulation at a pre-determined rate.1,2 A class of novel drug delivery systems is Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) which can deliver medicines via the skin portal to systemic circulation at a predetermined rate and maintain clinically effective concentrations over a prolonged period of time.3,4,5
Betulin, a pentacyclic triterpene and a plant pentacyclic triterpene metabolite, can be found in large quantities in the outer bark of the birches (Betula, Betulaceae). Betulin acid, obtained by betulin oxidation. Regarding the mode of action of Betulin, little is known about its antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing mechanisms. It is found in the bark of several species of plants, principally the white birch (Betula pubescens) from which it gets its name, but also the ber tree (Ziziphus mauritiana), selfheal (Prunella vulgaris), the tropical carnivorous plants Triphyophyllum peltatum and Ancistrocladus heyneanus, Diospyros leucomelas, a member of the persimmon family, Tetracera boiviniana, the jambul (Syzygium formosanum), flowering quince (Pseudocydonia sinensis, former Chaenomeles sinensis KOEHNE), rosemary, and Pulsatilla chinensis. Also, Betulin acid was found active in vitro against neuroectodermal (neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, Ewing's sarcoma and malignant brain tumors, ovarian carcinoma, in human leukemia HL-60 cells, and malignant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma SCC25 and SCC9 cell lines. Although the specific mechanism of action of betulin against malignant cells is still a subject of detailed research, the activity of betulin acid has been linked to the induction of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. As this process occurs with the sparing of non-cancer cells, and the induction of apoptosis can occur under conditions in which standard therapies fail, both substances seem as promising experimental anti-cancer drugs.6-14
In present study, attempt is made to prepare Transdermal patches containing an anti- inflammatory drug such as Betulin along with various polymers for controlled release action.
MATERIALS & METHODS
Materials
For the preparation and evaluation of the gel, basic reagents used are summarized in table.
Table 1: List of chemicals used in the experiment
|
S. No. |
Chemicals |
Manufacturer/Supplier |
|
Betulin |
Sigma Aldrich (Merck) |
|
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose E5 |
Loba Chemie |
|
Ethylcellulose |
Loba Chemie |
|
Dimethyl sulphoxide |
Hi-Media |
|
Dibutylphthalate |
CDH Chemicals |
|
Potassium chloride |
CDH Chemicals |
|
Fused calcium chloride |
CDH Chemicals |
|
Glycerol |
Loba Chemie |
|
Absolute Ethanol |
Loba Chemie |
|
HPLC grade Acetonitrile |
Spectrochem |
|
HPLC grade Methanol |
Spectrochem |
|
HPLC grade water |
Rankem |
|
Aluminium foils |
Sigma-Aldrich |
|
Chloroform |
CDH Chemicals |
Methods
Suitable method such as Solvent Casting Technique of Film Casting Technique are used for preparation of Transdermal patch.
A. Determination of melting point
Melting point of the drug was determined by taking small amount of drug in a capillary tube closed at one end and placed in a melting point apparatus This was performed thrice and average value of temperature at which drug melts was noted.
B. Determination of solubility
An excess amount of drug was taken and dissolved in a measured volume of distilled water in a volumetric flask to get a saturated solution and kept for 24 hours at room temperature for the attainment of equilibrium. These solutions were kept for sonication and then supernatant were filtered using a 0.45-micron whatmann filter paper, to separate the undissolved drug particles and diluted suitably and the concentration of Betulin in the filtrate was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring at 300 nm.15,16,17
C. Determination of partition coefficient
The partition coefficient of the drug was determined by taking equal volumes of 1-octanol and aqueous solution in a separating funnel. In case of water-soluble drugs, a drug solution was prepared in distilled water, and in case of water-insoluble drugs, a drug solution of was prepared in 1-octanol. Standard solution of the drug was prepared in this phosphate buffer pH 7.4 solution. Octanol (10 ml) was added to equal volume of this standard drug solution in a separating funnel and was kept for 24 h at 37±°C with intermittent shaking. Finally, the buffer solution was separated, clarified by centrifugation and assayed for drug content.18
2. Determination of drug-excipients compatibility
FT-IR: FT-IR spectroscopy was employed to ascertain the compatibility between Betulin and the selected polymers. The pure drug and drug with excipients were scanned separately.
Procedure: Potassium bromide was mixed with drug and/or polymer and the spectra were taken. FT-IR spectrum of Betulin was compared with FT-IR spectra of Betulin with polymer. Disappearance of Betulin peaks or shifting of peak in any of the spectra was studied.19
3. Procurement of standard drug
Betulin was procured from Sigma Aldrich (Merck).
4. Characterization of Betulin
A. DSC of Betulin
Purity profile of drug was determined by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The latter can be assessed by the melting behavior observed in the recorded thermogram. The main application of DSC to purity relies on the notion that impurities reduce the melting temperature of the drug. The melting temperature is a strong indication of drug purity.20 For carrying out DSC of the model drug, 2 mg of sample was placed in aluminum pan. The pan was crimped using punching press. The sample pan was placed in pan holder of the DSC machine. The sample was run at a ramp rate of 10oC/min from 25oC to 300oC with a flow rate of 60 ml/min for nitrogen.
5. Calibration curve of Betulin
The standard calibration curve was constructed to obtain a regression line equation to be used for finding out the concentration of drug in samples. Two calibration curves of drug were plotted; one by RP-HPLC method and one by UV spectrophotometer.21 Calibration curve by RP-HPLC method was used for assay of drug in gel matrix for entrapment efficiency studies. The other one was plotted by UV spectrophotometer using Ethanolic phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for carrying out in-vitro drug release studies.
6. Morphology studies (SEM analysis)
The surface morphology of pure drug and its treated counterpart, Drug-PC complex was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Evaluation of Transdermal patches
A. Physical appearance
All the prepared patches were visually inspected for color, clarity, flexibility and smoothness.
B. Thickness uniformity
To check the uniformity of thickness of the formulated films. The thickness of the film was measured at 3 different points using a digital caliper and average thickness of three reading was calculated.
C. Weight uniformity
For each formulation, three randomly selected patches were used. For weight variation test, 3 films from each batch were weighed individually and the average weight was calculated.22,23
D. Folding endurance
The folding endurance was measured manually for the prepared films. A strip of film (5 x 5 cm) was cut and repeatedly folded at the same place till it broke. The number of times the film could be folded at the same place without breaking/cracking gave the value of folding endurance.24,25,26
E. Percentage moisture absorption
The films were weighed accurately and placed in the desiccators containing 100 ml of saturated solution of potassium chloride, which maintains 80-90% RH. After 3 days, the films were taken out and weighed. The study was performed at room temperature. The percentage moisture absorption was calculated using the formula: 27,28
Percentage moisture absorption = Final Weight –Initial Weight/ Initial Weight X 100
F. Percentage moisture loss
The films were weighed accurately and kept in a desiccators containing anhydrous calcium chloride. After 3 days, the films were taken out and weighed. The moisture loss was calculated using the formula: 27,28
Percentage moisture loss = Final Weight –Initial Weight/ Initial Weight X 100
G. Water vapors transmission rate
Glass vials of 5 ml capacity were washed thoroughly and dried to a constant weight in an oven. About 1 gm of fused calcium chloride was taken in the vials & the polymer films of 1.44 cm2 were fixed over the brim with the help of an adhesive tape. Then the vials were weighed and stored in a humidity chamber of 80-90 % RH condition for a period of 24 hours. The vials were removed and weighed at time interval of 24 h for three consecutive days to note down the weight gain. 29,30,31
Water vapour transmission rate =
Final Weight –Initial Weight/ Time X Area X 100
H. Tensile strength
Tensile strength of the film was determined with Universal strength testing machine (Hounsfield, Slinfold, Horsham, U.K.). The sensitivity of the machine was 1 gram. It consisted of two load cell grips. The lower one was fixed and upper one was movable. The test film of size (4 × 1 cm2) was fixed between these cell grips and force was gradually applied till the film broke. The tensile strength of the film was taken directly from the dial reading in kg. Tensile strength is expressed as follows; 32,33,34
Tensile strength = Tensile load at Break/ Cross Sectional Area
I. Drug content uniformity of films
The patches (1cm2) were cut and added to a beaker containing 100ml of phosphate buffered saline of pH 7.4. The medium was stirred with magnetic bead. The contents were filtered using whatmann filter paper and the filtrate was examined for the drug content against the reference solution consisting of placebo films (containing no drug) at 215 nm spectrophotometrically.23
J. In vitro drug release studies
In vitro skin permeation studies were performed by using a modified Franz diffusion cell with a receptor compartment capacity of 20 ml. The synthetic cellophane membrane was mounted between the donor and receptor compartment of the diffusion cell. The formulated patches were cut into size of 1cm2 and placed over the drug release membrane and the receptor compartment of the diffusion cell was filled with phosphate buffer pH 7.4. The whole assembly was fixed on a magnetic stirrer, and the solution in the receptor compartment was constantly and continuously stirred using magnetic beads at 50 rpm; the temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.50C. The samples of 1ml were withdrawn at time interval of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 24 h, analyzed for drug content spectrophotometrically at 215 nm against blank. The receptor phase was replenished with an equal volume of phosphate buffer at each time of sample withdrawal. The cumulative amounts of drug permeated per square centimeter of patches were plotted against time.31,35,36
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Standard drug Melting point range of Betulin is 316 to 318 °C.
RESULTS
Table 2: Pre-formulation Studies
|
S.No. |
Drug |
Melting Point |
Solubility |
Partition Coefficient(P) |
|
1. |
Betulin |
318.32 o C |
5mg/ml |
4.6 |
Drug excipients compatibility studies
FT-IR Spectrum and values
Figure 1: IR Spectrum of Pure Betulin
Figure 2: IR Spectrum of Pure HPMC E5
Figure 3: IR Spectrum of Pure EC
Figure 4: IR Spectrum of Betulin +HPMC E5+EC mixture
Formulation of Transdermal patches
Compositions of different formulations containing Betulin
Table 3: Compositions of different formulations
|
Formulations |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
|
Betulin, mg |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
|
Ethylcellulose,mg |
300 |
* |
30 |
60 |
90 |
120 |
150 |
|
HPMC E(5cps),mg |
* |
300 |
270 |
240 |
210 |
180 |
150 |
|
Dibutylphthalate (2drop),ml |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
|
DMSO,ml |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
Chaloroform:Ethanol (1:1),ml |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
*No ingredient used,HPMC=Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose, DMSO=Dimethyl sulfoxide
Evaluation of Transdermal Patches
Table 4: Thickness Uniformity
|
S.No. |
Formulation code |
Average Thickness (mm) |
|||
|
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Mean±S.E.M. |
||
|
1. |
F1 |
0.20 |
0.18 |
0.22 |
0.202±0.04 |
|
2. |
F2 |
0.19 |
0.21 |
0.21 |
0.204±0.02 |
|
3. |
F3 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
0.21 |
0.208±0.03 |
|
4. |
F4 |
0.20 |
0.17 |
0.22 |
0.198±0.05 |
|
5. |
F5 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.17 |
0.156±0.03 |
|
6. |
F6 |
0.20 |
0.22 |
0.20 |
0.204±0.02 |
|
7. |
F7 |
0.17 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
0.192±0.03 |
Standard Error Means , n=3
Table 5: Weight Uniformity
|
S.No. |
Formulation code |
Average Weight |
|||
|
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Mean±S.E.M. |
||
|
1. |
F1 |
0.40 |
0.43 |
0.42 |
0.418±0.03 |
|
2. |
F2 |
0.38 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
0.368±0.02 |
|
3. |
F3 |
0.40 |
0.38 |
0.37 |
0.384±0.03 |
|
4. |
F4 |
0.41 |
0.39 |
0.38 |
0.394±0.03 |
|
5. |
F5 |
0.35 |
0.41 |
0.38 |
0.382±0.06 |
|
6. |
F6 |
0.38 |
0.34 |
0.36 |
0.362±0.04 |
|
7. |
F7 |
0.43 |
0.40 |
0.41 |
0.414±0.03 |
Standard Error Means, n=3
Table 6: Folding Endurance
|
S.No. |
Formulation code |
Folding Endurance |
|||
|
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Mean±S.E.M. |
||
|
1. |
F1 |
116 |
110 |
107 |
112.10± 9.0 |
|
2. |
F2 |
53 |
63 |
50 |
55.66±13.0 |
|
3. |
F3 |
60 |
67 |
73 |
66.64±13.0 |
|
4. |
F4 |
74 |
84 |
88 |
82.22±14.0 |
|
5. |
F5 |
85 |
79 |
94 |
86.00±9.0 |
|
6. |
F6 |
78 |
91 |
85 |
84.66±13.0 |
|
7. |
F7 |
93 |
104 |
90 |
95.66±13.0 |
Standard Error Means, n=3
Table 7: Percentage Moisture Absorption
|
S.No. |
Formulation code |
Percentage moisture absorption |
|||
|
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Mean±S.E.M. |
||
|
1. |
F1 |
4.65 |
6.97 |
9.30 |
6.97±4.65 |
|
2. |
F2 |
0.00 |
2.63 |
2.78 |
2.70±0.15 |
|
3. |
F3 |
0.00 |
2.98 |
2.74 |
2.86±0.24 |
|
4. |
F4 |
2.78 |
2.60 |
5.50 |
3.62±0.18 |
|
5. |
F5 |
2.43 |
2.48 |
4.87 |
3.26±2.44 |
|
6. |
F6 |
2.78 |
5.46 |
5.40 |
4.54±2.68 |
|
7. |
F7 |
4.76 |
7.14 |
7.24 |
6.38±2.48 |
Standard Error Means, n=3
e) Percentage Moisture Loss
Table 8: Percentage Moisture Loss
|
S.No. |
Formulation code |
Percentage moisture loss |
|||
|
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Mean±S.E.M. |
||
|
1. |
F1 |
10.6 |
12.5 |
15.8 |
12.90±5.2 |
|
2. |
F2 |
7.89 |
10.52 |
10.51 |
9.64±2.63 |
|
3. |
F3 |
7.50 |
10.06 |
10.00 |
9.16±2.56 |
|
4. |
F4 |
2.50 |
5.06 |
7.50 |
5.00±5.00 |
|
5. |
F5 |
2.85 |
2.85 |
5.71 |
3.82±2.14 |
|
6. |
F6 |
0.00 |
5.26 |
7.89 |
4.38±2.63 |
|
7. |
F7 |
6.97 |
9.30 |
11.62 |
9.28±4.65 |
Standard Error Means, n=3
f) Water Vapour Transition Rate
Table 9: Water Vapour Transition Rate
|
S.No.
|
Formulation code |
Water vapour transition rate |
|||
|
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Mean±S.E.M. |
||
|
1. |
F1 |
.043 |
.046 |
.046 |
.045±.006 |
|
2. |
F2 |
.020 |
.031 |
.028 |
.026±.008 |
|
3. |
F3 |
.026 |
.032 |
.034 |
.030±.006 |
|
4. |
F4 |
.028 |
.023 |
.034 |
.028±.006 |
|
5. |
F5 |
.031 |
.031 |
.028 |
.030±.002 |
|
6. |
F6 |
.037 |
.034 |
.046 |
.037±.006 |
|
7. |
F7 |
.049 |
.043 |
.037 |
.042±.008 |
Standard Error Means, n=3
g) Tensile Strength
Table 10: Tensile Strength
|
S.No. |
Formulation code |
Tensile strength Kg/mm2 |
|||
|
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Mean ± S.E.M. |
||
|
1. |
F1 |
3.85 |
3.96 |
3.71 |
3.84±0.25 |
|
2. |
F2 |
2.85 |
2.96 |
3.07 |
2.96±0.22 |
|
3. |
F3 |
3.05 |
3.14 |
3.13 |
3.13±0.09 |
|
4. |
F4 |
3.18 |
3.29 |
3.21 |
3.22±0.11 |
|
5. |
F5 |
3.22 |
3.31 |
3.28 |
3.27±0.09 |
|
6. |
F6 |
3.27 |
3.39 |
3.36 |
3.34±0.12 |
|
7. |
F7 |
3.32 |
3.47 |
3.44 |
3.41±0.15 |
Standard Error Means, n=3
h) Drug Content
Table 11: Drug Content
|
S.No. |
Formulation Studies |
Concentration Mean ± SEM*(mg/cm2) |
Percentage drug content |
|
1. |
F1 |
1.178±0.072 |
92.67 |
|
2. |
F2 |
1.156±0.072 |
87.68 |
|
3. |
F3 |
1.084±0.048 |
90.26 |
|
4. |
F4 |
1.085±0.056 |
90.27 |
|
5. |
F5 |
1.114±0.076 |
92.86 |
|
6. |
F6 |
1.116±0.038 |
92.87 |
|
7. |
F7 |
1.118±0.038 |
95.44 |
Standard Error Means, n=3
Characterization of standard drug:
A single endothermic peak in case of Betulin at 317.32 o C.
Different concentrations & their absorbance by UV Spectroscopy
Figure 5: Calibration curve of Betulin by HPLC
Figure 6: Calibration curve of Betulin by UV spectroscopy
Morphology studies (SEM analysis)
The pure drug exists in the form of irregular crystalline structures with sharp edges.. D-PC complexes were found to be free flowing particles. The average diameter of D-PC complex was in the range 9.28 to 17.44 µm.
Figure 7: SEM picture of Betulin Figure 8: SEM picture of D-PC complex
DISCUSSION
The present study was designed to investigate the possibility of preparing Transdermal patches of a known herbal bio-active compound Betulin to combat poor solubility and poor bioavailability profile. The transdermal patch was made by solvent casting technique using a D-PC complex (drug-phosphatydicholine complex). DSC studies revealed that there is no interaction between the different components of Transdermal films. Hence it indicated the stability of the patches. It holds an immense potential for development of topical herbal anti-inflammatory formulation comparable to topical NSAIDs. One of the additional advantages of the formulation is better stability profile. The formulated Transdermal film in the study is simple in preparation without using any special or costly excipients thus making it cost effective also.
Betulin is insoluble in water, phosphate buffer pH 7.4, chloroform, methanol and ethanol. The mean concentration of the drug dissolved in the ethanol was 5mg/ml .
The partition coefficient value was experimentally found to be 4.6. The results obtained indicate that the drug possesses sufficient lipophilicity, which fulfill the experiment of formulating the selected drug into a Transdermal film.
FT-IR: Chemical interaction between drug and the polymeric material was studied by using FT-IR. IR spectra of Betulin, HPMC E5, EC alone and their combinations are shown in Figures. The peaks can be considered as characteristic peaks of Betulin confirming the purity of the drug and prominently observed in IR spectra of Betulin along with polymers. This indicates there is no interaction between Betulin and polymers. The IR results suggest that the drug and polymers are compatible.
Physical appearance; The prepared Transdermal patches were transparent, smooth, uniform and flexible. The method adopted for preparation of system was found satisfactory.
Thickness uniformity; With the help of digital caliper, the thickness of film was measured at different points and the average thickness was noted. The result indicates that there was no much difference in the thickness within the formulations and it was found to vary from 0.156 ± 0.03 to 0.208 ± 0.03 mm with low standard Mean error. The results are given in Table and order of the thickness of films is F5 < F7 < F4 < F1 < F2 < F6 < F7.
Weight uniformity; Three different films of the individual batch were weighed and the average weight was ranging from 0.362 ± 0.04 to 0.418 ± 0.03 g with low standard deviation values. The order of the weight of films is F6 < F2 < F5 < F3 < F4 < F7 < F1.
Folding endurance; The recorded folding endurance of the films was > 150 times. The order of the folding endurance was F2 < F3 < F4 < F6 < F5 < F7 < F1. This test is important to check the ability of sample to withstand folding, which gives an indication of brittleness; less folding endurance indicates more brittleness.
Percentage moisture absorption; The moisture absorption studies carried out in desicator. All the patches showed least percentage moisture absorption. The order of the percentage moisture absorption is F1<F7<F6<F4<F3<F5<F2 (1.70 ± 0.15 to 6.97 ± 4.65) and the data is presented in the Table. The moisture uptake of the formulations was low, which could protect the formulations from microbial contamination and reduce bulkiness.
Percentage moisture loss; The moisture loss studies were carried out at 80 – 90% relative humidity. All the patches showed least percentage moisture loss. The order of the percentage moisture loss is F1<F2<F3<F7<F6<F4<F5 (3.82 ± 2.14 to 12.90 ±5.2)
Tensile strength; The tensile strength measures the ability of a patch to withstand rupture. Presence of dibutyl phthalate and dimethyl sulfoxide has shown good tensile strength. Both the combination show significant tensile strength. The mean value was found to vary between 2.96 ± 0.22 to 3.84 ± .025 kg/mm2.
Drug content; For the various formulations prepared drug content was found to vary between 1.084 ± 0.048 mg to 1.178 ± 0.072 mg. Drug distribution was found to be uniform in the polymeric films.
CONCLUSION
The following conclusions were drawn from results obtained.
The Transdermal patch of Betulin was prepared successfully by solvent evaporation method. The present work can further be preceded with in-vivo study on healthy animals to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
It’s our privilege to express the profound sense of gratitude and cordial thanks to our respected Chairman Mr. Anil Chopra, Vice Chairperson Ms. Sangeeta Chopra and Managing Director Prof. Manhar Arora, St. Soldier Educational Society, Jalandhar for providing the necessary facilities to complete this review/research work.
Conflicts of Interests
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding
Nil
Authors Contributions
All the authors have contributed equally.
REFERENCES
1. Panchagnula R, Transdermal delivery of drugs, Ind J Pharmacol ,1997; 29:140-56.
2. Kshirsagar NA, Drug delivery systems, Ind J Pharmacol, 2000; 32:54-61.
3. Gupta JRD, Tripathi P, Irchhiaya R, Garud N, Dubey P, Patel J, Formulation and evaluation of matrix type transdermal patches of Glibenclamide, Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res, 2009; 1(1): 46-50. https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2009.010111
4. Vyas SP, Roop KK. Controlled drug delivery concepts and advances,New Delhi: Vallabh prakash publishers, 2005;1:411-47.
5. Maurya SD, Aggarwa S l, Tilak VK, Dhakar RC, Singh A, Maurya G, Enhanced transdermal delivery of indinavir sulfate via transfersomes, Pharmacie Globale (IJCP). 2010; 1(06)
6. Yasukawa K, Takido M, Matsumoto T, Takeuchi M, Nakagawa S, Sterol and triterpene derivatives from plants inhibit the effects of a tumor promoter, and sitosterol and Betulin inhibit tumor formation in mouse skin two-stage carcinogenesis, Oncology,1991;48:72-76. https://doi.org/10.1159/000226898 PMid:1898988
7. Wick W, Grimmel C, Wagenknecht B, Dichgans J, Weller M, Betulin-induced apoptosis in glioma cells: A sequential requirement for new protein synthesis, formation of reactive oxygen species, and caspase processing, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther,1999;289:1306-1312.
8. Evan GI, Vousden KH. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer, Nature, 2001;411:342-348. https://doi.org/10.1038/35077213 PMid:11357141
9. Tan Y, Yu R, Pezzuto JM, Betulin-induced programmed cell death in human melanoma cells involves mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, Clin. Cancer Res., 2003;9:2866-2875.
10. Thurnher D, Turhani D, Pelzmann M, Wannemacher B, Knerer B, Formanek M, Wacheck V, Selzer E, Betulin: a new cytotoxic compound against malignant head and neck cancer cells, Head Neck,2003;25:732-740. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10231 PMid:12953308
11. Ehrhardt H, Fulda S, Fuhrer M, Debatin KM, Jeremias I,Betulin-induced apoptosis in leukemia cells. Leukemia,2004;18:1406-1412. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403406 PMid:15201849
12. Schmidt ML, Kuzmanoff KL, Ling-Indeck L, Pezzuto JM, Betulin induces apoptosis in human neuroblastoma cell lines, Eur. J. Cancer, 1997;33:2007-2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00294-3 PMid:9516843
13. Fulda S, Jeremias I, Steiner HH, Pietsch T, Debatin KM, Betulin: a new cytotoxic agent against malignant brain-tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer,1999;82:435-441.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990730)82:3<435::AID-IJC18>3.0.CO;2-1
14. Rajendran P, Jaggi M, Singh MK, Mukherjee R, Burman AC, Pharmacological evaluation of C-3 modified Betulin derivatives with potent anticancer activity, Invest. New Drugs, 2008;26:25-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-007-9081-4 PMid:17851638
15. Chauhan lti, Meenakshi B, Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery of Raloxifene hydrochloride. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2010;1(12):72-79.
16. Gajanan D, Dinesh J, Vinod P, Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of Clopodogrel bisulfate. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 2011; 1(3):269-278.
17. Kavitha K, Rajendra MM, Design and evaluation of transdermal films of Lornoxicam, International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 2011;2(2):54-62.
18. Subash SP, Muneer TK, Panneerselvam T, Mohd Azharuddin, Shabaraya AR, Controlled drug delivery of Diltiazem hydrochloride as transdermal patches: a novel approch on formulation evaluation in vitro and in vivo parameters, Research in Pharmacy,2011; 1(2):17-19.
19. Nilesh BR, Hardikar SR, Ashok BV, Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of Ropinirole HCL, Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2011; 2(1):138-148.
20. Chiu MH, Prenner EJ, Differential scanning calorimetry: An invaluable tool for a detailed thermodynamic characterization of macromolecules and their interactions, J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2011; 3(1):39-59. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.76463 PMid:21430954 PMCid:PMC3053520
21. Gbaguidi F, Accrombessi G, Moudachirou M, Leclercq JQ, HPLC quantification of two isomeric triterpenic acids isolated from Mitracarpus scaber and antimicrobial activity on Dermatophilus congolensis, J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2005; 39:990-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2005.05.030 PMid:16043321
22. Sathyapriya LS, Jayaprakash S, Prabhu RS, Abirami A, Subramanian K, Nagarajan M, An approach to the formulation and evaluation of transdermal DDS of isoxsuprine HCl, Int J Pharm Sci Tech, 2008;1(1):22-8.
23. Saxena M, Mutalik S, Reddy MS, Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of metoclopramide hydrochloride, Ind drugs, 2006;43(9):740-45.
24. Sankar V, Benito JD, Sivanand V, Ravichandran V, Raghuraman S, Velrajan G et, Design and evaluation of nifedipine transdermal patches, Ind J Pharm Sci, 2003; 65(5):510
25. Gupta JRD, Tripathi P, Irchhiaya R, Garud N, Dubey P, Patel JR, Formulation and evaluation of matrix type transdermal patches of Glibenclamide, Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res,2009;1(1): 46-50. https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2009.010111
26. Dandagi PM, Manavi FV, Gadag AP, Mastiholimath VS, Jagdeesh T, Formulation of ransdermal drug delivery of ketotifen fumarate, Ind J Pharm Sci, 2003; 65(3):239-43
27. Shivhare UD, Dorlikar VP, Bhusari KP, Mathur VB, Mirani BN,Effect of polymeric compositions on pharmacotechnical properties of carvedilol transdermal film. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotech, 2009;1(2):457-64 https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2009.2.1.10
28. Krishnaiah YS, Satyanarayana V, Bhaskar P, Influence of limonene on the bioavailability of nicardipine hydrochlorothiazide from membrane modulated transdermal therapeutic systems in human volunteers, Int J Pharm,2002;247:91-102 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00401-5 PMid:12429488
29. Murthy TEGK, Kishore VS, Effect of casting solvent and polymer on permeability of propranolol hydrochloride through membrane controlled transdermal drug delivery system, Ind J Pharm Sci, 2007;69(5):646-50 https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.38469
30. Jamakandi VG, Mulla JS, Vinay BL, Shivakumar HN, Formulation, characterization, and evaluation of matrix-type transdermal patches of a model antihypertensive drug, Asian J Pharma Sci, 2009;3(1): 59-65. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-8398.49177
31. Devi KV, Saisivam S, Maria GR, Deepti PU, Design and evaluate of matrix diffusion controlled transdermal patches of verapmil hydrochloride, Drug Dev Ind pharm,2003; 29(5):495-503. https://doi.org/10.1081/DDC-120018638 PMid:12779279
32. Dandagi PM, Manavi FV, Gadag AP, Mastiholimath VS, Jagdeesh T, Formulation of transdermal drug delivery of ketotifen fumarate, Ind J Pharm Sci, 2003; 65(3):239-43.
33. Kulkarni RV, Mutalik S, Hiremath D, Effect of plasticizers on the permeability and mechanical properties of eudragit films for transdermal application. Ind J Pharm Sci, 2002; 64(1):28-31.
34. Panigrahi L, Ghosal SK, Formulation and evaluation of pseudolatex transdermal drug delivery system of terbutaline sulphate, Ind J Pharm. Sci; 2002:79-82.
35. Ubaidulla U, Reddy MVS, Ruckmani K, Ahmad FJ, Khar RK, Transdermal therapeutic system of carvedilol: Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix on in vitro and in vivo characteristics, AAPS Pharm Sci Tech,2007; 8(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1208/pt0801002 PMid:17408218 PMCid:PMC2750430
36. Panigrahi L, Ghosal SK, Formulation and evaluation of pseudolatex transdermal drug delivery system of terbutaline sulphate, Ind J Pharm. Sci; 2002:79-82