Available online on 15.08.2022 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2011-2022 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                                 Research Article

Chemoprotective Effect of Carwin Capsules against Cyclophosphamide Induced Genotoxicity by In Vivo Micronucleus Assay

Niharika Thakur*1, Neeraj Upmanyu2, Rajiv Saxena3, Md. Abdul Aali Khan1

1 Truba Institute of Pharmacy, Karond Bypass Rd, Gandhi Nagar, Bhopal, MP-462038

2 SAGE University, Sahara Bypass Road Katara Hills, Extension, Bhopal MP-462022

3 Smriti College of Pharmaceutical Education, 4/1 Pipliya Kumar, MR-11, Dewas Naka Indore MP- 452010

Article Info:

_____________________________________________

Article History:

Received 13 June 2022      

Reviewed 20 July 2022

Accepted 27 July 2022  

Published 15 August 2022  _____________________________________________Cite this article as: 

Thakur N, Upmanyu N, Saxena R, Khan MAA, Chemoprotective Effect of Carwin Capsules against Cyclophosphamide Induced Genotoxicity by In Vivo Micronucleus Assay, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2022; 12(4-S):13-16

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v12i4-s.5482                                     

Abstract

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The protective effects of carwin capsules (CAR) against toxicity induced by cyclophosphamide (CYC) in mice were investigated using the micronucleus assay for anticlastogenic activity in mouse bone marrow cells. The experimental animals were pre-treated orally with the drug suspension (carwin capsule      suspension) for seven consecutive days (drug alone in group III and in combination with standard drug in group IV). The standard drug (cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/kg bw) was dissolved in saline and injected intraperitoneally. The results demonstrate that carwin was found to be significant (P<0.05) as compared to cyclophosphamide treated as the no. of MNPCEs in carwin treated was decreased effectively. And also carwin was able to significantly (P<0.01) protect the action caused by cyclophosphamide as well was also found to be very effective antigenotoxic (P<0.01) as compared to cyclophosphamide in scoring of PCE: NCE ratio. All the groups were compared with cyclophosphamide (-ve control). So, it was concluded that the used polyherbal formulation (carwin) was found to be very effective drug in cancer therapy as it has very less genotoxic effect as compared to cyclophosphamide and also has a protective effect with cyclophosphamide.

Keywords: Carwin capsules, Cyclophosphamide, Micronucleus assay, Antigenotoxic, Polyherbal formulation.

*Address for Correspondence:  

Niharika Thakur, Truba Institute of Pharmacy, Karond Bypass Rd, Gandhi Nagar, Bhopal, MP-462038

 


 

1. INTRODUCTION

Genotoxicity assessments are performed to detect whether a compound can induce direct or indirect DNA damage that may result in sequence alterations, loss of heterozygosity and chromosome disorders 1, 2. These events play an important role in many malignancies and induce heritable effects leading to congenital disorders3, 4. The evaluation of potential genotoxic effects is essential in the risk/benefit analysis of new drugs as well as for preparations already used in traditional medicine5, 6. International regulatory agencies have validated and recommend various genetic tests for genotoxic assessment, such as comet and micronucleus assays7. The micronucleus test is based on the detection of DNA breaks that result in chromosome fragments which are not included in the nucleus during mitosis, forming an additional nucleus. The comet assay is a technique used for detecting the presence of single strand breaks of DNA at alkali-sensitive sites or sites of incomplete excision repair in mammalian cells8. These tests have been used to analyze the toxicity9 as well as anti-genotoxic, anti-mutagenic and anti-carcinogenic effects10, 11 of extracts and isolated compounds from plants. The genotoxicity of anticancer drugs can result in secondary tumors in non tumor cells. For example, cyclophosphamide (CP) has been in clinical use for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant disorders for over 40 years. However, despite its wide spectrum of clinical uses, CP also possesses wide spectrum cytotoxicity to normal cells12, 13. The cellular toxicity of CP, an alkylating drug, is primarily connected to the damage it causes to DNA14.   Carwin is the time tested marvelous combination of precious antineoplastic and tissue promoting herbo-minerals. Carwin is very much useful in treating various types of benign, malignant and degenerative conditions15. In this study we investigated the ability of Carwin capsule to modulate the genetic damage induced by CP in the mouse erythropoietic system by determining the frequency of micronuclei in immature erythrocytes of bone marrow.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 

2.1. Material 

Drug sample (Carwin capules) was gifted from Unjha Pharmacy plant- Tonix Health Care, Ahmedabad along with its literature for research work. Standard drug (Cyclophosphamide) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, MO, USA. Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) was purchased from Hi Media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). Giemsa stain and May Gruen wald stain, bovine albumin and EDTA were purchased from SD Fine-Chem. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). Vehicle (Acacia suspension) was prepared in lab. and saline solution was purchased from local market. All other chemicals used were of the analytical grade.

2.2. Preparation of solutions

2.2.1. Drug sample solution

2% acacia suspension was prepared by suspending 2 gram of accurately weighed acacia powder in 100 ml of 0.9% saline. 10 ml of vehicle was taken separately to which 250 mg of powdered drug (capsule content) was added and sonicated to produce a suspension of 25 mg/ml strength. The dose was calculated based on body surface area of animals.

2.2.2. Chemical solutions

Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS): 4.75 gm of powder product (Hank’s salt) was suspended in 400 ml of 0.9% saline solution. 1% albumin solution and 0.15% EDTA solution was prepared separately in saline solution and added to the Hank’s salt solution and final volume was made upto 500 ml. (Schmid W, 1975)

2.2.3. Staining Solutions

Giemsa stain solution: The solution was prepared in 1:6 ratios in phosphate buffer.

May Gruenwald stain solution: The solution was prepared in 1:1 ratio in phosphate buffer16. 

2.3. Animals

In the present investigation the male Swiss albino mice (10-12 weeks, 20-25 gm) were group housed (n= 4) under a standard 12 h light/dark cycle and controlled conditions of temperature and humidity (25±2 °C, 55–65%). Mices received standard rodent chow and water ad libitum. Mices were acclimatized to laboratory conditions for 7 days before carrying out the experiments. All the experiments were carried in a noise-free room between 08.00 to 15.00 h. Separate group (n=4) of mices was used for each set of experiments. The animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), constituted for the purpose of control and supervision of experimental animals by Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

2.3.1. Grouping and treatments of experimental animals

Four animals in each group were taken and total four groups were divided. Group I (cyclophosphamide treated, 50mg/kg bw., i.p), Group II (vehicle treated, 1ml/100gm, oral), Group III (carwin treated 1.5mg/animal bsa. oral), Group IV (cyclophosphamide + carwin treated).

2.3.2. In-vivo micronucleus test

The micronucleus test is a mammalian in vivo test which detects damage to the chromosome or the mitotic apparatus induced by chemicals. Polychromatic erythrocytes in the bone marrow of rodents are used in the assay. When an erythroblast develops into an erythrocyte, the main nucleus is extruded and may leave micronuclei in the cytoplasm. Visualization of micronuclei is facilitated in these cells because they lack a nucleus. Micronuclei form under normal conditions. The assay is based on an increase in the frequency of micro nucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the bone marrow of treated animals. Micronuclei are small particles consisting of acentric fragments of chromosomes or entire chromosomes which lag behind at anaphase stage of cell division. After telophase, these fragments may not be included in the nuclei of daughter cells and form single or multiple micronuclei in the cytoplasm. Animals are exposed to the test substance by an appropriate route. They are sacrificed, the bone marrow extracted and smear preparations are made and stained. Polychromatic erythrocytes are scored for micronuclei under the microscope [17]. 

2.3.2.1. Procedure

The preparation and staining of bone marrow cells were carried out according to Schmid (1975) [17]. Each group consisted of four mice. The experimental animals were pre-treated orally with the drug suspension (carwin capsule    suspension) for seven consecutive days (drug alone in group III and in combination with standard drug in   group IV). Control animals received same volume of vehicle (acacia suspension) as that of experimental animals. The standard drug (cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/kg bw) was dissolved in saline and injected intraperitoneally. The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 24 h after injecting the standard drug.  The bone marrow cells from both femurs were flushed using syringe in the form of a fine suspension with the help of HBSS into a centrifuge tube. This cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded, leaving a small drop of HBSS.   Smears were prepared by putting a small drop of vicsous suspension on the end of a slide and spreaded by pulling the material on a glass slides and air dried. Dried slides were stained with May-Gruenwald stain solution for 2 min. and with Giemsa stain solution for 5 min., rinsed with distilled water and dried. All the slides were coded prior to microscopic analysis. At least 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal were scored for the incidence of micronuclei. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes is determined for each animal by counting a total of 1000 erythrocytes. All the data were analyzed by statistical method for comparing the effects of treatments on genotoxicity.

3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Genotoxicity is a property possessed by substances that makes them harmful to the genetic information contained in organisms and the substance that cause genotoxicity are called genotoxins. One of the common examples of genotoxin is cyclophosphamide (anticancer drug). Anticancer drugs have the property to decrease the growth rate (cell division) of the cancer cells but along with this they also affect the healthy, normal cells which naturally have a rapid turnover of cells which results in various severe side effects. Till now since after a long time research there is no available anticancer drug without having side effects. There are several ways to reduce or prevent the action of genotoxins. Chemicals which interfere with DNA repair or with genotoxin metabolism can be used as effective antigenotoxin. The present investigation was directed to study the possible protective activity of orally administered carwin suspension against cyclophosphamide induced genotoxicity (in vivo) in mice and to compare its genotoxic potential in contrast to cyclophosphamide. Genotoxicity was carried out in mouse bone marrow cells. Animals were divided into four groups each containing four animals. Group I (-ve control) was treated i.p. with cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg, bw.), Group II (control) was treated orally with vehicle (acacia suspension- 1ml/100gm), Group III was treated orally with carwin alone (1.5 mg/animal, bsa.), and Group IV was treated with cyclophosphamide + carwin. Animals were pretreated for 7 days with test drug (carwin). The evaluating parameters are frequencies of MNPCEs/1000 PCE and ratio of PCE: NCE. The results demonstrate that carwin was found to be significant (P<0.05) as compared to cyclophosphamide treated as the no. of MNPCEs in carwin treated was decreased effectively. And also carwin was able to significantly (P<0.01) protect the action caused by cyclophosphamide as well was also found to be very effective antigenotoxic (P<0.01) as compared to cyclophosphamide in scoring of PCE: NCE ratio. All the groups were compared with cyclophosphamide (-ve control) (Table 1 & Figure 1). Thus we reveal that the possible common mechanism of action of drug may be due to its antioxidant property, free radical scavenging property or even gene regulation could contribute to its direct and indirect antigenotoxic data. It is known that alkylating agent cyclophosphamide is one of a group of anticancer drugs that are administered as inactive prodrugs and that are activated in vivo via one or more metabolic steps. The initial step in the bioactivation of cyclophosphamide in­volves cytochrome P-450-mediated hydroxylation at C-4.


 

 

Table 1: Frequencies of micro nucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) in mice bone marrow cells after 7-day oral administration of 1.5 mg/animal of carwin capsule suspension

Group No.

Drug 

Dose 

MNPCEs/1000 PCEs (Mean±SEM)

PCE:NCE Ratio  (Mean±SEM)

I

Cyclophosphamide treated

50 mg/kg

      6.2±0.93

   4.28±0.33

II

Vehicle treated

1 ml/100gm

      1.9±0.84**

  1.16±0.17**                      

III

Carwin treated

1.5 mg/animal 

      2.6±0.53*

  1.38±0.23**

IV

Cyclophosphamide + Carwin treated

1.5 mg/animal + 50 mg/kg

      4.3±0.73

  2.22±0.14**

No. of animals in each group = 4,   Data expressed as mean ± S.E.M, One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's t-test   Group I- negative control, Group II- control, Group III- test, Group IV test + cyclophosphamide. All test and standard groups were compared with group I (negative control)      MNPCE - Micronucleated Polychromatic Erythrocytes, PCE - Polychromatic Erythrocytes, NCE - Normochromatic Erythrocytes ** P<0.01, * P<0.05

 


 

4. CONCLUSION

The present study was the first in vivo evaluation of the genotoxicity of an carwin capsule. From our results, it was concluded that the used polyherbal formulation (carwin) was found to be very effective drug in cancer therapy as it has very less genotoxic effect as compared to cyclophosphamide and has also has a protective effect with cyclophosphamide.

REFERENCES

1. Silva VA, Gonçalves GF, Pereira MSV, Gomes IF, Freitas AFR, Duniz MFF, et al., Assessment of mutagenic, antimutagenic and genotoxicity effects of mimosa tenuiflora. Rev Bras Farmacogn 2013; 23:329-334. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2013005000014

2. Tolentino F, Araújo PA, Marques EDS, Petreanu M, Andrade SF, Niero R, et al., In vivo evaluation of the genetic toxicity of rubus niveus Thunb. (Rosaceae) extract and initial screening of its potential chemoprevention against doxorubicin-induced DNA damage. J. Ethnopharmacol.2015; 164:89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.02.013

3. Shah SU. Importance of Genotoxicity & S2A guidelines for genotoxicity testing for pharmaceuticals. IOSR J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2015; 1:43-54. https://doi.org/10.9790/3008-0124354

4. Kasper E, Angot E, Colasse E, Nicol L, Sabourin J-C, Adriouch S, Lacoume Y, et al., Contribution of genotoxic anticancer treatments to the development of multiple primary tumours in the context of germline TP53 mutations. Eur. J. Canc.2018; 101:254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.011

5. Prinsloo G, Nogemane N, Street R. The use of plants containing genotoxic carcinogens as foods and medicine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018; 116: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.009

6. Fateh AH, Mohamed Z, Chik Z, Alsalahi A, Md Zain SR, Alshawsh MA. A mutagenicity and genotoxicity effect of Verbena officinalis leaves extract in Sprague- Dawley Rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1019; 235:88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.02.007

7. Llana-Ruiz-Cabello M, Pichardo S, Maisanaba S, Puerto M, Prieto AI, Gutierrez- Praena D, et al., In vitro toxicological evaluation of essential oils and their main compounds used in active food packaging: a review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015; 81:9-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.03.030

8. OECD, 2016. OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 487 - in Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

9. Araújo SS, Fernandes TCC, Cardona YT, Almeida PM, Marin-Morales MA, Santos AV, et al., Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of ethanolic extract of Euphorbia hyssopifolia L. on HepG2 cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015; 170:16-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.04.044

10. Lemes SR, Chaves DA, Silva Júnior NJ, Carneiro CC, Chen-Chen L, Almeida LM, Gonçalves PJ, et al., Antigenotoxicity protection of Carapa guianensis oil against mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide in mouse bone marrow. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2017; 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720150797

11. Makhuvele R, Mastshoga RG, Antonissen R, Pieters L, Verschaevede L, Elgorashia EE. Genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of selected South African indigenous plants. South Afr. J. Bot. 2018; 114:89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.10.016

12. Fraiser LH, Kanekal S, Kehrer JP. Cyclophosphamide toxicity. Drugs 1991; 42:781-795 https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199142050-00005

13. Moore MJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide. Clin Pharmacokinet 1991; 20:194-208. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199120030-00002

14. Brookes P. The early history of the biological alkylating agents. Mutat Res 1990; 233:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(90)90145-T

15. https://www.unjha.in/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=264

16. Aaron CS, sorg R, Zimmer D. The mouse bone marrow micronucleus test: Evaluation of 21 drug candidates, Mutatiom Res. 1989; 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(89)90041-4

17. Schmid W. The micronucleus test. Mutation Res.1975; 31:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(75)90058-8